educational inequalities - differential achievement Flashcards
class differences in achievement
inside factors- labelling
Becker
found that teachers see middle class pupils as closest to the ‘ideal pupil’ in terms of performance, conduct, appearance and attitude.
Labels applied by teachers to pupils share the nature and quality of the interaction between pupil and teacher
Pupils will react to these judgments leading to a self fulfilling prophecy where the pupil internalises the label and conforms to a prediction.
Therefore working class students may be labelled as non-achievers or deviant which may lead to their lack of achievement
class differences in achievement
inside factors-labelling
Keddie
Researched streaming (grouping students based on ability) found evidence of teachers expectations being less for those in bottom streams affecting teacher attitude and practise
A streamers- were trusted to work with minimum supervision and make contributions to class discussion
C streamers- needed constant social control and formed anti school subcultures.
class differences in achievement
inside factors-labelling
hargreaves
Compared 2 streams of boys and found the selection of streams was closely related to behaviour. Top streams reward for behaviour whilst lower streams form anti school subcultures which increased the polarisation of the ability groups.
Process that occurred between the labelling of teachers about students:
Speculation based on guesses, working hypothesis based on interactions, elaboration testing hypothesis,= and stabilisation interpreting judgements and interactions.
class differences in achievement
inside factors- labelling
abrahams
Interconnection of setting, labelling and subcultures to explain why students underachieve. Dominant class and gender ideologies of society are promoted in education by teachers, who subconsciously label students. Streaming should be stopped and trainee teachers educated to recognise labelling
class differences in achievement
inside factors- pupil subcultures
hargreaves
Compared 2 streams of boys and found the selection of streams was closely related to behaviour. Top streams reward for behaviour whilst lower streams form anti school subcultures which increased the polarisation of the ability groups.
Process that occurred between the labelling of teachers about students:
Speculation based on guesses, working hypothesis based on interactions, elaboration testing hypothesis,= and stabilisation interpreting judgements and interactions.
class differences in achievement
inside factors- pupil subcultures
mac and ghail
Subcultures of working class boys who followed their fathers into traditional working class manual labour jobs. ‘Macho lads’ shaped their working class identity by performing manual labour work. De-industrialisation led to their crisis of masculinity as there was a shift to part time office based roles suited to the lifestyles of women. These boys did not have the academic qualifications needed to move into new working class job roles so had no medium for displaying working class masculinity as women become breadwinners.
class differences in achievement
inside factors- pupil subcultures
Studied 12 working class boys ‘lads’ forming a counter school subculture who felt superior to more conformist pupils ‘earoles.’ They showed little interest in academic work, preferred ‘having a laff’, tried to identify with the adult non-school world and saw manual work as superior to mental work. Counter school subculture prepared them for the boredom and monotony of shop floor work of local factories
class differences in achievement
inside factors- theoretical explanations
althusser-marxist
Education is impacted by the infrastructure to benefit the bourgeoisie by passing on ruling class ideologies and passing on necessary skills to create a workforce. Ideological state apparatus - education is used by the ruling class to pass on ideologies and ensure the working class are kept in a subordinate position. The education system is manipulated and designed to ensure students are trained to be unquestioning, subordinate, hard working and conformist
class differences in achievement
inside factors- theoretical explanations
bowles+gintis-marxism
Education serves to reproduce the capitalist relations of production with appropriate skills and attitudes. Correspondence principle- workers will adapt to the needs of the system and school corresponds to the world of work. Pupils who fit in and conform rise above those who express attitudes or behaviours challenging the system
class differences in achievement
inside factors- theoretical explanations
durkheim-functionalist
Education should emphasise the moral responsibilities members of society have towards each other- passing on social solidarity and value consensus. Education ensures people have skills for a specialised division of labour and standardised testing helps to assess skills.
class differences in achievement
inside factors- theoretical explanations
davis+moore-functionalism
Education performs role allocation by sorting and grading students in terms of ability which is rewarded in exam success ensuring those with highest ability are rewarded in a meritocratic society in terms of economic rewards to ensure these people fill the most functionally important roles
class differences in achievement
outside factors-biological
eysenck
States that IQ is largely inherited as 60-80% is genetically based. Claims that ‘what children take out of school is proportional to what they bring to the school in terms of IQ.’ class differences in intelligence largely account for class differences in educational attainment.
class differences in achievement
outside factors-biological
hernstein and jensen-new right
60-80% of intelligence is genetically based. Class differences in intelligence largely account for class differences in educational achievement.
class differences in achievement
outside factors- material
smith and noble
Low income students face ‘financial barriers to learning’ as parents can’t afford school uniforms, transport, materials and textbooks leading to isolation and bullying, less likely to have an area to work at home, more likely to work part time and marketisation of schools meaning better resourced schools are in affluent areas.
class differences in achievement
outside factors- material
Raey et al
Discussed the idea of economic capital which is needed to gain cultural capital having a negative impact on some students educational attainment as they miss out on it. Working class students are more likely to have part time jobs so are more likely to work longer hours reducing their chances of attaining higher grades.
25% of private school students have extra tuition compared to only 10% of state school students.
Positive evaluation: led to increases in tuition fees - increase in ‘fear of debt’
class differences in achievement
outside factors- material
palmer
50% of BAME students are from low income families which will impact their life chances i.e. lack economic capital to achieve in education fully (tutors, resources etc…).