Education: Social class Flashcards
What are external factors?
Factors outside of school
-Materials
-Culture
What are internal factors?
Factors within the school
Material deprivation
Lack of financial resources and physical necessities that are crucial for educational success
Examples of material factors
-Housing conditions
-Diet and health
-Access to educational resources
-Financial stress
-Fear of debt
Evidence that poor housing conditions affect attainment?
-Smith and Noble(1995):
Highlight how poor housing conditions can lead to frequent illness, affecting school attendance and performance
-Waldfogel and Washbrook (2010):
Suggest that overcrowded and poorly maintained homes contribute to difficulties in studying at home
Evidence that diet and health affect attainment?
-Howard (2001):
Found that children from poorer homes are more likely to have poor nutrition, leading to low energy and more absences form school due to illness
Evidence that access to educational resources affect attainment?
-Douglas (1964):
Middle class children have more access to educational resources at home, contributing to their higher achievement
-Bernstein and Young (1967):
Middle class parents are more like to buy educational toys and books and activities that stimulate intellectual development, giving the child an early advantage
Evidence that financial stress can affect attainment?
-Ridge (2002):
Financial stress can lead to students taking on part time work, which often negatively impacts their academic performance due to time constraints and fatigue
Evidence that fear of debt can affect attainment
-Callander and Jackson (2005)
Working class students are more debt-averse and see more costs than benefits in higher education making them less likely to apply to university
Criticisms of material factors
-Although they do influence attainment, their exact impact is difficult to determine because they are often closely linked with cultural factors so it is challenging to isolate the effects of material deprivation alone
-Material factors have different impacts on different social groups.
For example, Indians and Chinese. The difference in achievement between those who recieve school meals and those who don’t is very slim compared to the white population. This suggests that some groups can overcome deprivation more effectively, possibly due to higher community expectations.
Cultural deprivation
a person has inferior norms, values, skills and knowledge.
Future orientation
Planning for the future
Deferred gratification
Putting off today’s pleasures for future gain
Present-time orientation
A lack of emphasis on long term goals and future planning
Immediate gratification
Getting pleasures now, rather than putting them off for the future
Fatalism
Not seeing the point in working hard
What did Sugarman say about the different values and attitudes of classes and how they impact achievement?
-Different values and attitudes of the middle class and working class influence their educational progress
-Middle Class: The promise of a good career through effort and qualifications leads to a future orientation and deferred gratification . Individual effort and intelligence = key to educational success
-Working Class: WC jobs do not require educational qualifications as much as MC jobs. The lack of promotion opportunities leads to present time orientation, immediate gratification and fatalism.
Strength and criticism of Sugarman’s work on values of different classes
-Despite his work being very old, Perry and Francis’s 2010 review identifies evidence that similar attitudes and values are still found today and have an impact on aspirations and achievement
-Critics argue that this perspective unfairly blames working class culture for underachievement without considering systematic issues within the education system or recognising the strengths in working class culture
What did Douglas find out about working class parents attitudes to education?
-Placed less value on education
-Less ambitious for their children and gave less encouragement
-Took less interest in educational progress e.g not going to parents evenings
-As a result, their children had lower levels of motivation and achievement
What did Douglas find out about Middle class parents attitudes towards education?
-Visited schools more often
-More likely to discus their children’s progress with their teachers
What did Feinstein say about middle class parents attitudes towards education?
-Feinstein argues that parents own education is the most important factor in affecting achievement and since middle class parents tend to be better educated they are able to give their children an advantage by how they socialise them:
-Their parenting style tends to consist on high disciple and expectations of their children, which encourages active learning and exploration
-Educated so are more aware of how to assist their child’s progress. For example, they are more likely to read to them, paint, teach letters and numbers and help with homework
-They tend to use their income on things that promote educational success e.g toys, books that stimulate intellectual development and private school and tutors
Who said middle class mothers were more likely to buy their children educational toys, books and activities ?
Bernstein and Young ( 1967)
3 main aspects of cultural deprivation?
-Parental attitudes
-Language
-Subcultural explanations
What does Bernstein say about restricted code?
-Informal language
-Ungrammatical and with limited explanation and vocabulary (slang)
-Used by both MC and WC but WC are limited to this form of language
WC:
-Less likely to understand information in class
-More likely to struggle in interviews and less likely to not get the job = less opportunities
Criticisms of Bernstein’s research on speech codes
-He tends to put all middle class together as having equal use of the elaborate code but there are wide differences between the higher and lower middle class (similarly with higher and lower working class) so generalisation cannot be made
-Rosen : He gives very few examples to back up his arguments and accuses him of creating a myth of the superiority of the middle class speech
-Labov 1973: critical of the notion that working class speech is in any way inferior to that of the middle class. Based on his research in Harlem, he claims that they are just simply different and that in many ways working class speakers are more effective in making their points and that middle class speakers frequently get bogged down in a mass of irrelevant detail.
What does Hubbs-Tait et al (2002) say about the impact of language on attainment?
-Parents who engage in complex, cognitively challenging interactions with their children significantly boost their child’s cognitive performance. This helps to develop the child’s reasoning skills and foster greater intellectual growth
What does Feinstein say about the impact of language in educational attainment (2008)
-Found educated are more likely to use such cognitively demanding language, which is instrumental in advancing their child’s achievement
Criticisms of the cultural deprivation theory
-Keddie- Cultural deprivation is a myth and it victim blames. A child cannot be deprived of its own culture, working class culture is just different from the middle class culture, putting them at a disadvantage as the education system is dominated by middle class culture
-Bourdieu- Blames parents and suggests wc culture is inferior. Instead he blames capitalist society and the education system.
What does Bernstein say about elaborate code ?
-Formal language
-Used in the classroom and workplace
-Wider vocab, more grammatically complex sentences and words
-Mainly used by middle class
-Have an advantage over WC as they are more likely to find writing essays, understanding textbooks and detailed explanation easier to understand
What is success in education based (Bourdieu)?
-Each social class has its own habitus.
-Success in education is based on the possession of cultural capital and of access to the habitus of the dominant social class