Education: Gender Flashcards
External factors that explain why girls have outperformed in education
-The impact of feminism
-Changes in the family
-Changes in the job market and women’s employment
-Girls changing attitudes and ambitions
-Girls mature earlier
-Differences in socialisation and behaviour
Internal factors that explain why girls have outperformed in education
-Equal opportunities policies
-Positive role models in schools
-Teacher attention and classroom interaction
-GCSE and Coursework
-Challenging stereotypes in the curriculum
-Selection and League Tables
The impact of feminism
-Since the 1960, they have challenged traditional roles of women as mothers and housewives, broadening women’s ambitions and self perceptions. This was done through advocating for equal rights in all institutions.
What did Angela McRobbie find in her study on girls magazines
-In the 1970s, magazines emphasised marriage and avoiding being ‘left on the shelf’
-1990s: Magazines feature more images of assertive and independent women.
This reflects the broader impact of feminism.
How has the increase in lone parent families lead to the outperformance of girls
-The rise in female headed lone parent families present a new role model for girls: the financially independent woman who takes on the role of the breadwinner
How has an increase in divorce rates led to girls outperformance
-Encourage girls to seek financial independence through qualifications rather than relying on a husband as a provider.
Examples of changes in the job market that have led to girls outperformance
-1970 Equal Pay Act
-1975 Sex Discrimination Act
-Since 1975, the gender pay gap has halved from 30% to around 15%
-Women in employment: 1971= 53%, 2013= 67%
What did Sue Sharpe find in her study on girls ambitions
-1970s: Girls prioritised love, marriage and children before a career and viewed educational success as ‘unfeminine’
-By the 1990s: Girls were more career orientated, valued independence and saw education as a path to self sufficiency
What’s did O’Connor (2006) find in his study on girls aspirations
-14-17 year olds did not consider marriage and children a significant part of their future plans
What did Beck (2001) find in their study on girls ambitions
-Identified a trend toward individualism in modern society, where independence is highly valued. A career promises recognition and economic self sufficiency, which girls now see as achievable through education
What did Fuller (2011) find in her study on girl’s ambitions
-Educational success has become central to many girls identities. Girls in her study saw themselves to be responsible for shaping their futures, believing in meritocracy and aiming for careers that enable them to be independent
What did Diane Reay (1998) say about social class differences in girls aspirations
-Some working class girls continue to aspire to traditional gender roles and see marriage and children as achievable goals.
-Reay attributes this to limited job opportunities for these girls, leading them to focus on traditional family roles as a source of status
What did Biggart (2002) say about social class differences in girls aspirations
-WC girls facing uncertain futures in the labour market often see motherhood as their only viable option. This leads them to place less emphasis on educational achievement.
How does girls’ earlier maturity explain their outperformance
-This maturity gives them a more responsible attitude toward exams and career planning, contributing to their academic achievement and understanding of long term goals.
How does differences in socialisation and behaviour explain why girls have outperformed
-Socialisation has historically emphasised feminine roles like caregiving, however parents are increasingly encouraging girls to pursue higher aspirations.