Ecological Study Design Flashcards

1
Q

What is an ecological study?

A

Observational study where data are analysed at the population or group level, rather than individual level

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are ecological studies used for?

A

Often used to measure prevalence and incidence of disease – particularly when disease rare

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the advantages of ecological studies?

A
  • Inexpensive
  • Easy to undertake – use routinely collected data
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the disadvantages of ecological studies?

A
  • Prone to bias & confounding
  • Careful to extrapolating to individuals within the measurement areas or to higher population level
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Why do an ecological study?

A

Public health

Large scale comparisons

If individual measurements are not available

Disease rare

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What kinds of measurements are there in ecological studies?

A

Health outcomes

Ecological or exposure data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What kind of ecological risk or exposure data exist?

A

Aggregate measure

Environmental measures

Global measures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are aggregated measures?

A

Data are summaries of individual level data.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are environmental measures?

A

Equivalent individual level data conceivable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are global measures?

A

No equivalent individual level data.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What types of ecological studies?

A

Geographical

Longitudinal

Migration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are geographical ecological studies?

A

Compare one geography with another.

Assesses one geography with another.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are longitudinal ecological studies?

A
  • Population monitored to assess changes in disease over time
  • Confounding factors may be included in the analysis
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is migration ecological studies?

A

Migrant population data collected & analysed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is ecological fallacy?

A

Type of confounding specific to ecological studies

When relationships found for groups are believed to be true for individuals.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How is confounding avoided during ecological data?

A

Regression modelling

17
Q

What kind of regression modelling is used in ecological studies?

A
  • Poisson regression
  • Negative binomial regression
  • Multilevel modelling
18
Q

What is area-level exposure?

A

Some environmental exposures determined by area.

19
Q

What is exposure misclassification?

A

Proxy measures based on modelling may not adequately capture exposure of individual

20
Q

What is the ideal analysis for ecological studies?

A

Based on individual-level data.

21
Q

Why does exposure misclassification occur?

A

Exposures are modelled

22
Q

What is regression dilution bias?

A

Bias of effect size estimates towards the null

23
Q

What is ecological regression?

A

Where group is the unit rather than individual

24
Q

What are the implications of small excess relative risk on public health?

A

Even small excess relative risks applied to large numbers of people could result in large excess numbers of disease

25
What was the aim of the BCM Cancer 2012 ecological study?
Test predictions of spatial variation that might arise as a result of environmental mechanisms & area-level socio-economic deprivation
26
What is an aetiological hypothesis?
A primary factor influencing geographical heterogeneity of incidence is modulated by differences in environmental exposures
27
What was the case data for the ecological study of BCM cancer 2012?
Patients diagnosed with primary osteosarcoma or Ewing sarcoma in GB between 1980-2005, less than 50 years old.
28
How was population data obtained in the BMC cancer study 2012?
At small-area level, census ward in E&W and postcode sector
29
How was the demographic data collected in the BMC cancer study?
Small-area demographic characteristics derived from the censuses
30
Which statistical test was used for the BMC cancer 2012 study?
Negative binomial regression
31
What were the findings for the MBC cancer study of 2012?
Females have a lower incidence of osteosarcoma if in higher levels of deprivation. Lower incidence of Ewing sarcoma associated with residence in densely populated areas and people without cars.
32
What can be interpreted about osteosarcoma from the BMC cancer 2012 study?
For females, geographical heterogeneity of incidence is affected by the environment (deprived areas)
33
What can be interpreted about Ewing sarcoma from the BMC Cancer 2012 study?
Geographical heterogeneity of incidence is affected by dense population and deprived.
34
What is a Methodological Caveat?
A warning or proviso of specific stipulations, conditions, or limitations
35
What was the aim of the type 1 diabetes Yorkshire ecological study?
Finding the Relationship between incidence of childhood type 1 diabetes & levels of nitrate in drinking water investigated.
36
What was the study area of the type 1 diabetes Yorkshire ecological study?
Yorkshire Regional Health Authority
37
What was the hypothesis of the type 1 diabetes Yorkshire ecological study?
Geographical heterogeneity of incidence of type 1 diabetes is modulated by differences in nitrate in drinking water
38
What was the findings of the type 1 diabetes Yorkshire ecological study?
Diabetes incidence was positively associated with raised mean nitrate levels. Significant negative trends were found between standardised incidence ratios. Nitrate in drinking water may be a precursor of chemicals which are toxic to the pancreas
39