Ecological Study Design Flashcards

1
Q

What is an ecological study?

A

Observational study where data are analysed at the population or group level, rather than individual level

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are ecological studies used for?

A

Often used to measure prevalence and incidence of disease – particularly when disease rare

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the advantages of ecological studies?

A
  • Inexpensive
  • Easy to undertake – use routinely collected data
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the disadvantages of ecological studies?

A
  • Prone to bias & confounding
  • Careful to extrapolating to individuals within the measurement areas or to higher population level
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Why do an ecological study?

A

Public health

Large scale comparisons

If individual measurements are not available

Disease rare

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What kinds of measurements are there in ecological studies?

A

Health outcomes

Ecological or exposure data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What kind of ecological risk or exposure data exist?

A

Aggregate measure

Environmental measures

Global measures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are aggregated measures?

A

Data are summaries of individual level data.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are environmental measures?

A

Equivalent individual level data conceivable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are global measures?

A

No equivalent individual level data.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What types of ecological studies?

A

Geographical

Longitudinal

Migration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are geographical ecological studies?

A

Compare one geography with another.

Assesses one geography with another.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are longitudinal ecological studies?

A
  • Population monitored to assess changes in disease over time
  • Confounding factors may be included in the analysis
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is migration ecological studies?

A

Migrant population data collected & analysed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is ecological fallacy?

A

Type of confounding specific to ecological studies

When relationships found for groups are believed to be true for individuals.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How is confounding avoided during ecological data?

A

Regression modelling

17
Q

What kind of regression modelling is used in ecological studies?

A
  • Poisson regression
  • Negative binomial regression
  • Multilevel modelling
18
Q

What is area-level exposure?

A

Some environmental exposures determined by area.

19
Q

What is exposure misclassification?

A

Proxy measures based on modelling may not adequately capture exposure of individual

20
Q

What is the ideal analysis for ecological studies?

A

Based on individual-level data.

21
Q

Why does exposure misclassification occur?

A

Exposures are modelled

22
Q

What is regression dilution bias?

A

Bias of effect size estimates towards the null

23
Q

What is ecological regression?

A

Where group is the unit rather than individual

24
Q

What are the implications of small excess relative risk on public health?

A

Even small excess relative risks applied to large numbers of people could result in large excess numbers of disease

25
Q

What was the aim of the BCM Cancer 2012 ecological study?

A

Test predictions of spatial variation that might arise as a result of environmental mechanisms & area-level socio-economic deprivation

26
Q

What is an aetiological hypothesis?

A

A primary factor influencing geographical heterogeneity of incidence is modulated by differences in environmental exposures

27
Q

What was the case data for the ecological study of BCM cancer 2012?

A

Patients diagnosed with primary osteosarcoma or Ewing sarcoma in GB between 1980-2005, less than 50 years old.

28
Q

How was population data obtained in the BMC cancer study 2012?

A

At small-area level, census ward in E&W and postcode sector

29
Q

How was the demographic data collected in the BMC cancer study?

A

Small-area demographic characteristics derived from the censuses

30
Q

Which statistical test was used for the BMC cancer 2012 study?

A

Negative binomial regression

31
Q

What were the findings for the MBC cancer study of 2012?

A

Females have a lower incidence of osteosarcoma if in higher levels of deprivation.

Lower incidence of Ewing sarcoma associated with residence in densely populated areas and people without cars.

32
Q

What can be interpreted about osteosarcoma from the BMC cancer 2012 study?

A

For females, geographical heterogeneity of incidence is affected by the environment (deprived areas)

33
Q

What can be interpreted about Ewing sarcoma from the BMC Cancer 2012 study?

A

Geographical heterogeneity of incidence is affected by dense population and deprived.

34
Q

What is a Methodological Caveat?

A

A warning or proviso of specific stipulations, conditions, or limitations

35
Q

What was the aim of the type 1 diabetes Yorkshire ecological study?

A

Finding the Relationship between incidence of childhood type 1 diabetes & levels of nitrate in drinking water investigated.

36
Q

What was the study area of the type 1 diabetes Yorkshire ecological study?

A

Yorkshire Regional Health Authority

37
Q

What was the hypothesis of the type 1 diabetes Yorkshire ecological study?

A

Geographical heterogeneity of incidence of type 1 diabetes is modulated by differences in nitrate in drinking water

38
Q

What was the findings of the type 1 diabetes Yorkshire ecological study?

A

Diabetes incidence was positively associated with raised mean nitrate levels.

Significant negative trends were found between standardised incidence ratios.

Nitrate in drinking water may be a precursor of chemicals which are toxic to the pancreas

39
Q
A