Debates Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

(Ethical Considerations) Define the term ‘ethics’.

A

The guidelines that must be kept by researcher in order to protect the wellbeing of participants involved in their research.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

(Ethical Considerations) Explain the ethical consideration of ‘informed consent’.

A

Participants must agree to take part and know what the research involves.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

(Ethical Considerations) Explain the ethical consideration of ‘confidentiality’.

A

The personal details of participants must be kept confidential.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

(Ethical Considerations) Explain the ethical consideration of ‘deception’.

A

Participants must not be tricked in any way during their involvement in the study.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

(Ethical Considerations) Explain the ethical consideration of ‘debrief’.

A

Participants must be informed of study details at the end of their participation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

(Ethical Considerations) Explain the ethical consideration of ‘right to withdraw’.

A

Participants are able to leave at any time. They do not need to say why they wish to leave.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

(Ethical Considerations) Explain the ethical consideration of ‘protection from harm’.

A

Participants should not experience mental or physical harm as a result of their involvement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

(Ethical Considerations) State the 4 ethical principles.

A

Respect, competence, responsibility and integrity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

(Ethical Considerations) What categories fall under the ethical principle of ‘respect’?

A

Informed consent, right to withdraw and confidentiality.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

(Ethical Considerations) What categories fall under the ethical principle of ‘responsibility’?

A

Protection from harm and debrief.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

(Ethical Considerations) What category falls under the ethical principle of ‘integrity’?

A

Deception.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

(Ethical Considerations) Explain the ethical principle of ‘competence’.

A

Researchers shouldn’t give advice beyond that which they are competent to give.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

(Nature vs Nurture) State the definition of ‘nature’ regarding this debate.

A

We are the product of our genetic inheritance, such that how we behave is due to factors innate within us.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

(Nature vs Nurture) State the definition of ‘nurture’ regarding this debate.

A

We are the products of our upbringings, such that how we behave is due to our personal encounters and experiences.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

(Nature vs Nurture) Does Bandura sway to the nature or nurture side of the debate?

A

Nurture, as the children were behaving in response to their experience of watching an adult model.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

(Individual-Situational) Explain what is meant by ‘individual explanations’ of behaviour?

A

Someone’s behaviour is a result of their personality.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

(Individual-Situational) Explain what is meant by ‘situational explanations’ of behaviour?

A

Someone’s behaviour is a result of the circumstances they’re in.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

(Individual-Situational) Why might Milgram’s study be seen as individual regarding this debate?

A
  • Not everyone obeyed (35% didn’t administer shocks until 450V).
  • If someone was particularly extraverted they’d disobey.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

(Individual-Situational) Why might Milgram’s study be seen as situational regarding this debate?

A
  • They responded to the demands of the experimenter.
  • They were paid, it was Yale, the volunteered, they thought it was a 50/50 chance etc.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

(Individual-Situational) Why might Piliavin’s study be seen as individual regarding this debate?

A
  • No diffusion of responsibility found.
  • Sex: 90% of first helpers were male.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

(Individual-Situational) Why might Piliavin’s study be seen as situational regarding this debate?

A
  • The type of victim (ill or drunk) made a difference in % helped.
  • They helped because they were trapped.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

(Psychology as a Science) What are the 3 features of a science?

A

Objectivity, falsifiability and replicability.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

(Psychology as a Science) What is meant by the term ‘objectivity’?

A

The findings are a matter of fact, rather than opinion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

(Psychology as a Science) What is meant by the term ‘falsifiability’?

A

In principle, it would be possible to prove the findings false.

25
Q

(Psychology as a Science) What is meant by the term ‘replicability’?

A

If the study is repeated and the same results are obtained.

26
Q

(Psychology as a Science) What 2 core studies are scientific?

A

Bandura and Loftus & Palmer.

27
Q

(Psychology as a Science) Why is Loftus & Palmer considered scientific?

A
  • Gained objective data (mean speed estimated and number of people who reported to of having seen broken glass).
  • Was falsifiable as the standardised procedure could be replicated again to prove false.
28
Q

(Psychology as a Science) Why is Bandura considered scientific?

A
  • Gained objective data (number of aggressive acts shown by the children within stage 3)
  • Was falsifiable as the standardised procedure could be replication again to prove false.
29
Q

(Psychology as a Science) What 2 core studies are not scientific?

A

Freud and Kohlberg.

30
Q

(Psychology as a Science) Why is Freud not considered scientific?

A
  • The procedure wasn’t very replicable due to the lack of control and specific sample.
  • It is impossible to prove Freud’s results false as he is finding reasoning from the unconscious mind.
  • The data collected was very subjective and can be interpreted in many different ways.
31
Q

(Psychology as a Science) Why is Kohlberg not considered scientific?

A

The verbal responses from the boys were very subjective and can be interpreted in many ways.

32
Q

(Reductionism vs Holism) What does reductionism investigate?

A

The most basic underlying reasons behind human behaviour (e.g. a study focusing on how age affects behaviour).

33
Q

(Reductionism vs Holism) What does holism investigate?

A

Multiple factors at lots of different levels that all interact (e.g. a study looking at not jus how age influences helping behaviour but also culture and gender).

34
Q

(Reductionism vs Holism) Is Loftus & Palmers’ study reductionist or holistic?

A

Reductionist.

35
Q

(Reductionism vs Holism) How is Loftus & Palmers’ study reductionist?

A

Critical Question 1: They were focused on the speed estimate made by the participant (based on the verb used in the critical question).
Critical Question 2: They were focused on the false memories given by the participant (based on the verb used in the critical question).

36
Q

(Reductionism vs Holism) What are the benefits of Loftus & Palmers’ study being reductionist?

A
  • You can identify the effect of the critical question on the DV (establish cause and effect).
  • You can use this as a starting point for further research on other factors into eyewitness testimony.
37
Q

(Reductionism vs Holism) What are the drawbacks of Loftus & Palmers’ study being reductionist?

A
  • The procedure lacked ecological validity as in a lab environment to test the effect of the IV.
  • It is hard to reduce memory down to a single-factor explanation.
38
Q

(Reductionism vs Holism) Is Piliavin’s study reductionist or holistic?

A

Holistic.

39
Q

(Reductionism vs Holism) How is Piliavin’s study holistic?

A

Social Influence: Presence of other, state of victim, presence of model.
Cognition: Arousal cost-reward, analysis.
Biology: Gender, race.

40
Q

(Socially Sensitive Research) What is socially sensitive research?

A

When the research has wider negative implications for the individuals the sample represents.

41
Q

(Socially Sensitive Research) What 4 core studies can this debate be linked to?

A

Yerkes, Moray, Bandura, Loftus & Palmer.

42
Q

(Socially Sensitive Research) How can Yerkes’ study be linked to this debate?

A

The conclusion that some ethnic groups are more intelligent than others can/did have negative consequences.
The Immigration Restriction Act came into action in 1924 an this meant many people were not allowed entry to the USA because of their race.

43
Q

(Socially Sensitive Research) How can Bandura’s study be linked to this debate?

A

Parents of aggressive children may receive discrimination, because people may blame them for their child’s aggressions (as the findings suggest they must have learnt it from an adult role model).

44
Q

(Socially Sensitive Research) How can Moray’s study be linked to this debate?

A

Moray’s study wasn’t especially socially sensitive as the findings were supposedly generalisable to everyone. this means we cannot discriminate against people who have an inattentional barrier as this is everyone.

45
Q

(Socially Sensitive Research) How can Kohlberg’s study be linked to this debate?

A

Not especially socially sensitive as his findings suggest an invariant developmental sequences that is universal. Therefore it is not targeting one group of individuals, it is suggesting everyone develops morals in the same way.

46
Q

(Socially Sensitive Research) How can Loftus & Palmers’ study be linked to this debate?

A

Not especially socially sensitive as many people are already aware that their memories can be flawed.
Those with ‘false memories; are not being blamed for this within the conclusion as this flaw is result of external influences (such as police questioning). Therefore, this will not leas to any negative consequences.

47
Q

(Usefulness) How is Milgram’s study useful in a positive way?

A

Can be used by legitimate authority figures, such as police, teachers etc to try and encourage following rules.

48
Q

(Usefulness) How is Piliavin’s study useful in a positive way?

A

Can be used to highlight to medical staff possible biases there may be (e.g. not prioritise drunk patients) to try and prevent this.

49
Q

(Usefulness) How is Bandura’s study useful in a positive way?

A

Can be used by teachers and parents to ensure they are only displayed behaviours they wish children will imitate.

50
Q

(Usefulness) How is Kohlberg’s study useful in a positive way?

A

Can be used by teachers to identify what stage their students are in and change their teaching tactics accordingly.

51
Q

(Usefulness) What is important to bare in mind when discussing usefulness?

A

Do not just say the research is useful as it tells us something. Focus on who could use the research and how they would do this.

52
Q

(Usefulness) How is Milgram’s study useful in a negative way?

A

Can be used by illegitimate authority figures (such as dictators) to encourage obedience to their rules.

53
Q

(Usefulness) How is Piliavin’s study useful in a negative way?

A

Can be used as a mechanism for scams (e.g. criminals can appear to need help to get people in before stealing from them).

54
Q

(Usefulness) How is Bandura’s study useful in a negative way?

A

Can be used to encourage children to display bad behaviours (perhaps to join an extremist group).

55
Q

(Usefulness) How is Kohlberg’s study useful in a negative way?

A

Can be used by extremist group leader to make their ideas fit with the morals of the person they wish to join.

56
Q

(Free will vs determinism) Define the term ‘free will’ regarding this debate.

A

We are able to choose how we behave in a given situation.

57
Q

(Free will vs determinism) Define the term ‘determinism’ regarding this debate.

A

Our behaviour is caused by factors outside of our control. This could be as a result of genetics, or other biological factors such as brain functioning, it could be a result of our past experiences and upbringing, or it could be due to the situation we are in and our environment.

58
Q

(Free will vs determinism) How does this debate link to Bandura’s study?

A

It suggests that behaviour is determined by our environment and by learning from adult role models. The children’s aggression was determined by the aggression they had witnessed.

59
Q

(Free will vs determinism) How does this debate link to Loftus & Palmers’ study?

A

Suggests that even our memory can be determined by outside factors. The study showed that people’s memory was affected by the words used to question them.