Debates Flashcards
(Ethical Considerations) Define the term ‘ethics’.
The guidelines that must be kept by researcher in order to protect the wellbeing of participants involved in their research.
(Ethical Considerations) Explain the ethical consideration of ‘informed consent’.
Participants must agree to take part and know what the research involves.
(Ethical Considerations) Explain the ethical consideration of ‘confidentiality’.
The personal details of participants must be kept confidential.
(Ethical Considerations) Explain the ethical consideration of ‘deception’.
Participants must not be tricked in any way during their involvement in the study.
(Ethical Considerations) Explain the ethical consideration of ‘debrief’.
Participants must be informed of study details at the end of their participation.
(Ethical Considerations) Explain the ethical consideration of ‘right to withdraw’.
Participants are able to leave at any time. They do not need to say why they wish to leave.
(Ethical Considerations) Explain the ethical consideration of ‘protection from harm’.
Participants should not experience mental or physical harm as a result of their involvement.
(Ethical Considerations) State the 4 ethical principles.
Respect, competence, responsibility and integrity.
(Ethical Considerations) What categories fall under the ethical principle of ‘respect’?
Informed consent, right to withdraw and confidentiality.
(Ethical Considerations) What categories fall under the ethical principle of ‘responsibility’?
Protection from harm and debrief.
(Ethical Considerations) What category falls under the ethical principle of ‘integrity’?
Deception.
(Ethical Considerations) Explain the ethical principle of ‘competence’.
Researchers shouldn’t give advice beyond that which they are competent to give.
(Nature vs Nurture) State the definition of ‘nature’ regarding this debate.
We are the product of our genetic inheritance, such that how we behave is due to factors innate within us.
(Nature vs Nurture) State the definition of ‘nurture’ regarding this debate.
We are the products of our upbringings, such that how we behave is due to our personal encounters and experiences.
(Nature vs Nurture) Does Bandura sway to the nature or nurture side of the debate?
Nurture, as the children were behaving in response to their experience of watching an adult model.
(Individual-Situational) Explain what is meant by ‘individual explanations’ of behaviour?
Someone’s behaviour is a result of their personality.
(Individual-Situational) Explain what is meant by ‘situational explanations’ of behaviour?
Someone’s behaviour is a result of the circumstances they’re in.
(Individual-Situational) Why might Milgram’s study be seen as individual regarding this debate?
- Not everyone obeyed (35% didn’t administer shocks until 450V).
- If someone was particularly extraverted they’d disobey.
(Individual-Situational) Why might Milgram’s study be seen as situational regarding this debate?
- They responded to the demands of the experimenter.
- They were paid, it was Yale, the volunteered, they thought it was a 50/50 chance etc.
(Individual-Situational) Why might Piliavin’s study be seen as individual regarding this debate?
- No diffusion of responsibility found.
- Sex: 90% of first helpers were male.
(Individual-Situational) Why might Piliavin’s study be seen as situational regarding this debate?
- The type of victim (ill or drunk) made a difference in % helped.
- They helped because they were trapped.
(Psychology as a Science) What are the 3 features of a science?
Objectivity, falsifiability and replicability.
(Psychology as a Science) What is meant by the term ‘objectivity’?
The findings are a matter of fact, rather than opinion.