Baron-Cohen et al (1997) Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

(Baron-Cohen et al) Define the term ‘autism’.

A

“A lifelong developmental disability that affects how a person communicates with, and relates to, other people. It also affects how they make sense of the world around them.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

(Baron-Cohen et al) What are the Triad of Impairments?

A
  1. Social Communication
  2. Social Interaction
  3. Social Imagination
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

(Baron-Cohen et al) Explain an example of ‘Social Communication’ in regards to the Triad of Impairments.

A

Finding it hard to ‘read’ a person’s face or tone of voice; not understanding sarcasm.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

(Baron-Cohen et al) Explain an example ‘Social Interaction’ in regards to the Triad of Impairments.

A

Behaving in ways other people see as inappropriate, such as starting up a conversation ‘out of the blue’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

(Baron-Cohen et al) Explain an example ‘Social Imagination’ in regards to the Triad of Impairments.

A

Finding it hard to predict what will happen next and/or to anticipate danger.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

(Baron-Cohen et al) Define the term ‘Theory of Mind’.

A

The ability to infer what another person is thinking or feeling.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

(Baron-Cohen et al) Define the term ‘ceiling effect’.

A

When a test places a cap on the level of ability a person is able to show.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

(Baron-Cohen et al) Define the term ‘Tourette’s Syndrome’.

A

A childhood-onset disorder that can cause severe disruption to education and peer relations, the main symptom is tics or involuntary movements.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

(Baron-Cohen et al) What are the aims of this study?

A
  • To investigate whether adults with autism still experience a deficit in Theory of Mind.
  • To develop a new ‘advanced’ way of testing Theory of Mind that would be appropriate for adults.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

(Baron-Cohen et al) Describe the ‘autistic’ sample.

A
  • 16 adults aged 18-49 with either autism or Asperger’s syndrome
  • 13 male, 3 female
  • Recruited via an advert in the National Autistic Society’s Communication magazine or through professional contacts of Baron-Cohon
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

(Baron-Cohen et al) Describe the ‘control’ sample.

A
  • 50 ‘normal’ adults, aged 18-48
  • 25 male, 25 female
  • Recruited from the general population of Cambridge, UK, where Baron-Cohen was based
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

(Baron-Cohen et al) Describe the ‘tourettes’ sample.

A
  • 10 adults with Tourette’s syndrome, aged 18-47
  • 8 male, 2 female
  • Recruited from a referral centre in London
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

(Baron-Cohen et al) What were the 2 control tasks?

A

Gender Recognition
Basic Emotion Recognition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

(Baron-Cohen et al) Describe the control task, ‘Gender Recognition’.

A

Participants were shown black and white images of eyes and asked to determine if the person was male or female.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

(Baron-Cohen et al) Describe the control task, ‘Basic Emotion Recognition’.

A

Participants were shown black and white full face images and asked to determine the basic emotion displayed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

(Baron-Cohen et al) What and why did Baron-Cohen also give participants to confirm if his new test actually measured Theory of Mind?

A

The ‘Strange Stories’ task as this had already been validated as a test of Theory of Mind.

17
Q

(Baron-Cohen et al) What was the problem with Baron-Cohen giving his participants the ‘Strange Stories’ task?

A

It had been developed for use with 8-9 year olds, so there was the risk of it having the ceiling effect with adults - hence the need for a more ‘advanced’ test.

18
Q

(Baron-Cohen et al) What does the ‘Strange Stories’ task access?

A

The child’s understanding of: pretence, joke, lie, white lie, misunderstanding, persuasion, appearance/reality, figure of speech, irony, double bluff, contrary emotions, and forgetting.

19
Q

(Baron-Cohen et al) Where did participants complete the ‘Eyes’ task?

A

On a computer.

20
Q

(Baron-Cohen et al) Describe how the ‘Eyes’ task works.

A

The task shows black and white images of eyes for 3 seconds each. Participants were given 2 opposing words describing the emotion felt by the person within the image from which to select one option.
Each participant was given a score out of 25.

21
Q

(Baron-Cohen et al) What were the mean findings for each group for ‘The Eyes Task’.

A

Autistic: 16.3
Control: 20.3
Tourettes: 20.4

22
Q

(Baron-Cohen et al) What were the mean findings between males and females for ‘The Eyes Task’.

A

Males: 18.8
Females: 21.8

23
Q

(Baron-Cohen et al) What are the conclusions from this study?

A

Autistic adults still have impairments within the Theory of Mind.
Females have better Theory of Mind than males.

24
Q

(Baron-Cohen et al) How does ecological validity relate to this study?

A

Figuring out emotions from static, black and white images of eyes is not common.

25
Q

(Baron-Cohen et al) How does population validity relate to this study?

A

The sample was diverse in terms of age and gender but lacked diversity in terms of diagnosis and ethnicity.

26
Q

(Baron-Cohen et al) How does concurrent validity relate to this study?

A

They compared the new test (eye task) with an established tests (strange stories) to check it was accurate.

27
Q

(Baron-Cohen et al) How does internal reliability relate to this study?

A

High number of controls used in the eyes task: same size images, 3 seconds each, black and white, all participants viewed the same images etc.

28
Q

(Baron-Cohen et al) How does external reliability relate to this study?

A

Large sample of participants in normal population but sample of autistic/AS participants and Tourette’s participants was fairly small and so may not produce consistent findings.

29
Q

(Baron-Cohen et al) How does the nature-nurture debate relate to this study?

A

Nature - identifies Theory of Mind ability as a result of naturally occurring gender and condition.

30
Q

(Baron-Cohen et al) How does the freewill-determinism debate relate to this study?

A

Theory of Mind ability most likely is determined by your conditions and/or gender.

31
Q

(Baron-Cohen et al) How does the individual-situational debate relate to this study?

A

Individual as the person’s Theory of Mind ability didn’t vary in different test/scenarios.

32
Q

(Baron-Cohen et al) Give two examples of similarities between this study and Freud.

A
  1. Both collected data through self-report.
  2. Both had high ecological validity by being conducted in their own homes.
33
Q

(Baron-Cohen et al) Give two examples of differences between this study and Freud.

A
  • Studies use different research methods.
  • Studies had samples of different ages.
34
Q

(Baron-Cohen et al) How HAS this study changed our understanding of the key theme? (4)

A
  • It has told us about a different disorder.
  • Shown a different way of explaining disorders.
  • Investigated disorders in adults, rather than in a child.
  • Shown that different research methods can be used to understand disorders.
35
Q

(Baron-Cohen et al) How HASN’T this study changed our understanding of the key theme? (2)

A
  • Does not say anything about new phobias.
  • Both studies identify disorders are individual.
36
Q

(Baron-Cohen et al) How has/hasn’t this study changed our understanding of diversity, regarding individual diversity?

A

HAS: Freud told us about phobias. Baron-Cohen provides insight into the experiences of those with autism/AS.

37
Q

(Baron-Cohen et al) How has/hasn’t this study changed our understanding of diversity, regarding social diversity?

A

HAS: Does tell us that males and females differ in their mind reading abilities so could suggest social differences between genders - weren’t tested by Freud.

38
Q

(Baron-Cohen et al) How has/hasn’t this study changed our understanding of diversity, regarding cultural diversity?

A

HAS: Carried out in different countries (UK and Australia).

HASN’T: Does not really add to our understanding of cultural diversity because you would expect phobias and autism to exist in different cultures - both studies looked at western cultures.