compliance Flashcards
what is compliance
-when under pressure target goes along with the request
-overtly behave in a way consistent with the request but the target may not necessarily agree/like what they are doing
compliance according to Hogg and Vaughan 2014
superficial public change in behaviour in response to group pressure
what are the compliance tactics
-reason based: norm of reciprocity, reciprocal concessions, foot in the door
-emotion based: mood, negative state relief
-norm based: norm based appeals, descriptive and prescriptive
reason based compliance tactics (reciprocity principle)
-norm of reciprocity
-makes recipient feel they owe you and should return favour
-Regan 1971: compliance greater in those who had received a favour
-Carlsmith and Gross 1969: compliance greater from guilty people, takes away guilt from people so they comply for their own and other’s benefit
reason based compliance tactics (promising reciprocity)
-Gueguen 2016: promising a favour for a request increases compliance
reason based compliance tactics (foot in face)
-starting with big requests and getting smaller e.g mum can i get a tattoo, can i drive the car, can i have some ice cream- yes
reason based compliance tactics (foot in door)
-opposite to foot in face
-asking for something small then asking bigger request
-Freedman and Fraser 2006: pp answer a few qs about household soap and then asked to make an inventory of all household products, 53% comply w. big request compared to 22% of controls who were not asked initial small request
-DeJong 1979: self perception theory (Bem), by complying with small request target sees themself as helpful, to be consistent with this view they are more likely to comply to larger requests
emotion based compliance tactics
-negative state relief hypothesis: people engage in actions to relieve neg. feelings to feel better
-prosocial behaviour motivated by bystander’s desire to reduce uncomfortable neg. emotions (Cialdini, Baumann and Kenrick 1981)
norm based compliance tactics
-descriptive norms: behaviour exhibited by majority in given context
-prescriptive norms: way we are supposed to behave in a given context
what is the ingratiation approach
-getting recipient to like you so more likely to agree with you e.g making yourself more attractive
what is the low ball tactic
-Cialdini et al
-2 groups of pp: control asked to participate in study next day at 7am (31% agree), target group asked to participate in study next day (56% agree), then early start time 7am revealed, 95% of those who agreed turned up
low ball vs foot in door
similarities
-both get target to commit to behavioural trajectories
differences
-foot in door get people to agree to small behaviour then introduces different bigger behaviour
-low ball focuses on same behaviour but conceals the ‘sting’ until after the target’s initial agreement