Cognitive, WEEK 1 Flashcards
What is cognition?
mental action/process of acquiring knowledge through thought, experience and senses
What is cognitive psychology?
Scientific study of thought + experience (how the mind generates thoughts and perceptions and how our thought impacts perception)
What is the information processing approach
behaviourist
- Explains how cognition works + is comparable to how a computer works
- Stimulus from world (e.g. noise) gets processed in stages > pay attention to the stimulus, perceive it, process it (cognition) and then decide what want to do + respond, usually with a motor action (do we do anything about the stimulus?)
- Processes happen sequentially > “stimulus response machines”, humans are just responding to what is in the environment (bottom-up)
What does the information processing approach assume?
- Serial processing: Only one step happens at a time in order > info gets processed by one module then is sent to the next and cannot go backwards
- Bottom-up processing: processing caused by a stimulus (enters from bottom of your brain and processed to the top > external stimulus triggers processing)
- Stimulus is the input and info from it is based entirely from the stimulus, nothing else happening in the brain is relevant to it > stimulus processed sequentially = output
Criticisms of information processing approach
- Doesn’t allow for parallel processing > this is where we can do tasks simultaneously on different processors (humans can multi-task + is unexplained by the app)
- Ignores top-down processing > influence of the individuals mind, prior knowledge, goals and expectations about the world. > this beh approach oversimplifies the processing of info
What are representations?
- Everything we see and experience in the world is also represented in our brain
- E.G: if a person watches a person walking a dog (person has an experience of seeing the dog), there must be a representation of a dog in the persons brain (what a dog is) > the firing of neurons/brain cells represents the dog (when you look at a dog, neurons are firing together and that is the experience of the dog)
- If you can have a conscious experience of something, that must be represented in your brain somewhere in the firing of neurons as that is the experience.
How can neurons represent complex information?
- Some neurons have preferred stimuli (e.g. respond to a certain colour more than others) > more likely to fire when faced with preferred stimuli than others
- Quiroga (2012) looked at patients with implanted electrodes in medial temporal cortex > found when showing a ppt many kinds of stimuli, a picture of Luke Skywalker led to neuron firing to increase compared to other stimuli > can explain how representations form
- An individual neuron doesn’t necessarily represent a whole concept, it is likely to overlap with other neurons.
- Referred to as “Grandmother cells” sometimes > idea there is a cell in your mind which fires when you think of your grandmother
Rate vs Temporal codes
- Shows how information can combine to form representations of things (e.g. dog/Luke Skywalker)
- Rate coding: In each neuron, the information which it represents is represented in how fast it fires. (whether it fires quick or slow depends on the info it is representing)
- Temporal coding: Rate at which neurons fire may not be as important as the synchrony of several neurons firing together (when neurons fire together, you have a representation of Luke Skywalker + when they stop firing together, the person is no longer thinking of Luke Skywalker)
- Important in the binding problem
Binding problem
- refers to the fact we are able to bind different features which are represented by different neurons + pathways > e.g. when we perceive a moving blue ball we do not process it separately as being blue, a ball and moving, we process it all as one suggesting there must be a neural mechanism allowing info to “bind”
What is experimental cognitive psychology?
- Studying behaviour in controlled laboratory settings using manipulations of stimuli given to participants. Done to manipulate the way participants think and the type of mental processes they use then measure their behaviour (output) > measures what happens in the brain indirectly by observing behaviour
- Instead of “brain measures”, cognitive psych uses behavioural measures such as reaction times or accuracy (how quickly can people make decisions?)
- Using the reaction of the participant, we can infer what mental processes occurred before the decision was made
Inference
refers to filling out missing gaps using information which is already known. E.g. you see a woman with a nappy in her hand and vomit on her top, you may infer she has a child
Stroop test (e.g. of experimental psych)
- Stroop test is designed to see if reading is automatic or not. (meant to read the colour of the word written (which is also a colour)
- Typically, RT’s are quicker for words that match the colour than for words which don’t. If you see the word red written in green, you process red first because you have automatically read it and processed it > red interferes with ability to press green.
Strengths & limitations of experimental cognitive psychology
+ Successful in generating theories about cognition which can then be tested in other methods like neuropsychology
+ Contributed to making Psychology an empirical science > have data which can be measured accurately and more quantitative than other measures
- Lacks ecological validity: can we generalise the stroop task to real life? RT to stimuli which we would not face in everyday life > does cognition work the same way in everyday life as in experiments
- Lacks face validity: we are measuring cognition indirectly using RT’s and accuracy, how do we know what we are indirectly measuring actually measures cognition
- Do psychological concepts even exist? can’t assume something exists just because it is named (e.g. attention).
What is cognitive neuropsychology?
- Study cognition in patients with brain injuries > study the way in which cognitive + thought processes, perception etc have changed in people with brain damage.
- Goal is to find out which part of the brain is most responsible for which cognitive concept (e.g. if a patient has damage to their parietal lobe + has problems with orienting attention, we may infer that the parietal lobe is associated with attention) > can use this to test the area and its relation to attention
Limitations of cognitive neuropsychology
- No baseline: don’t know the ability of the patient before their brain injury, could already have a problem with attention e.g > have to make assumptions about what their cognitive abilities were before their injuries to understand what has changed > cannot be completely certain
- Generalisation: Is the same injury going to cause the same psychological deficit in other people? certain parts of your brain are more likely to be damaged due to injuries causing them while others are rarely damaged > if someone gets brain damage to a part of the brain nobody else has and has certain affects, we won’t know if this can be generalised to others
- Modularity: assumes brain is divided into modules where one part of the brain deals with language, another with attention and so on. More likely the brain is a distributed system where processes occur across multiple areas rather than just one. (e.g. attention is likely to involve communication across multiple parts of the brain)