Cognitive, Models of Memory, WEEK 7 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Ebbinghaus

A
  • first real memory researcher + researched his own memory
  • Studied memory using (consonant vowel) nonsense syllables to exclude prior knowledge such as PAB, SER, NID > presented with 20 of these syllables using a metronome timing how long they are presented for (one run through the list > single repetition)
  • Then would test himself by giving himself the first syllable of the list then test how many other syllables he remembered
  • To keep it scientific he tested himself everyday at the same time of day (standardised) > results showed insight into learning (law of repetition) and forgetting (savings method) > forgetting is the opposite of what we see for the law of repetition (high retention to forgetting curve?)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Law of repetition

A
  • Found that the more you rehearse, the better your retention > at the start performance was quite high (after first and second repetition) but the more that he repeated it, there was less new information because he had learnt it all
  • The levelling off of the curve shows that no new data was learnt + memory retention was high because they learnt the info
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Phases of Memory

A
  • Acquisition/Encoding: how new information is manipulated + placed in memory.
  • Storage: how and where it is held in memory ( aka “memory trace”) > probably 2 steps: temporary memory trace in hippocampus, then integration in cortical information networks.
  • Retrieval: “remembering”, memory brought back into active use. Once we do this, memory becomes malleable again > when we store it again the new memory will be a bit different to the original one
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Atkinson & Shiffrin Model of Memory Storage (multi-modal model)

A
  • Argue there are three types of memory > sensory memory, short term memory + long term memory > these are discrete processing stages
  • Sensory input goes to sensory memory, if we pay attention to it, it transfers to the STM where it can be rehearsed. Rehearsed info then gets stored in the LTM
  • Unattended info in sensory will get lost, unrehearsed info in STM will get lost and some info in LTM could decay over time
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Sensory store

A
  • At any given moment, you are being bombarded with sensory information (visual, auditory, smell, taste etc..) > this is info we cannot remember for our whole life
  • The sensory store can fill in blanks when there is regular stimulation
  • Sensory memory somehow takes a snapshot of what is happening in the world which you use to attend to what you think is important (e.g. if you ask someone what did they say but then you can recall it before they say it again because it was still in your sensory store)
  • Or when you have a sparkler and turn very quickly it makes a circle but a picture would not see this you would just see one point of the sparkler > if you stop moving around the trail will disappear very quickly so we know the store is time limited
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Sensory store function

Evidence on capacity and duration: George Sperling (1960)

A
  • keep sensory information in mind so we can attend to it > this is modality-specific
  • Classic experiment on visual sensory store
  • Sperling presented 12 letters (3 by 4 matrix) for 50ms + ppts name as many letters as possible (full report condition) > people could name around 4 letters > doesn’t mean the capacity of the sensory store is 4 letters because ppts can sense that there were more letters
  • Takes time to read out things from the store and information fades out with time so while you are reading out, the information starts to fade > doesn’t mean the info was not there in the sensory memory to begin with
  • In the partial report condition, ppts would fixate on a cross then shown the letters, a tone would be chimed either before the display (100ms before) or up to one second after the display ended > the tone would be high, medium or low, ppts were trained so the tone indicated what row to report (high=top row, medium = middle row, low = bottom) > max that can be remembered by individual ppts is 4 because 4 on each row
  • To understand capacity we need to do a lot of trials + take average performance for each row so that we have maximum of 12 remembered
  • Results showed if the tone was made at the same time as presentation of letters, over 9 items could be remembered, after 100ms this drops to 7 and continuing on > longer the delay between presentation of image and tone, the worse the performance
  • Can conclude that a lot can be held in the iconic memory (perhaps anything entering the visual system) > as for duration, performance in the partial report got worse + more similar to full report condition between 250ms-500ms > means info in iconic memory decays very quickly (half a second) but this depend on the kind of stimuli
  • E.G. if you give people a natural scene, this could be remembered for a second or using auditory stimuli in experiments show retention for around 3 seconds
  • Any info left in sensory store transferred to STM before it was lost
  • All letters were held in sensory memory for short time but decayed rapidly. Tone acts as a spatial attention cue. Attention > STM
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Modalities of sensory store

A
  • iconic memory for vision
  • echoic memory for hearing
  • haptic memory for touch
  • olfactory memory for smell
  • gustatory memory for taste
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Short-term memory

A
  • Function of STM is to process information consciously > attention is important here because it limits what information will be attended to and processed further
  • From the sensory register, the brain encodes information > “Once we receive sensory information from the environment, our brains label or code it. We organize the information with other similar information and connect new concepts to existing concepts” > things can be encoded visually, acoustically or semantically (e.g. reading a text using visual encoding so reading letters or acoustic where you remember the sounds of the words or semantic where you remember the meaning)
  • Even when you read silently, this is acoustically encoded > research shows if you show a string of letters or words and then recall them, people tend to make acoustic errors (e.g. confusing can with man as opposed to can with tire or mixing B with E)
  • Information from our sensory store needs to get encoded to be stored in STM
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Capacity of STM

A
  • Miller, 1956: Magic number 7 +/- 2 argues that we have a very limited capacity in STM > we typically remember 7+2 or 7- 2 items when shown letters > seen as an information bottle neck + Cowan (2001) argues it is probably closer to 4
  • This doesn’t mean we can only remember 7 items, we can overcome this by using chunking where we group similar stimuli together
  • Chunking depends on the knowledge we activate from our LTM + expertise you have in your ability of finding patterns > e.g. in an experiment with chess players, if they were shown a picture of a chess board with chess pieces from a game then expert chess players could remember where the pieces were better than novice chess players. If the chess pieces were randomly places, experts were no better than novice players
  • CHUNK: Meaningful unit of information
  • Chunking example here shows 3 chunks of information even though there are 12 letters but it is easy to remember because it relates to our prior semantic knowledge
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Duration of STM

A
  • STM is limited in duration > if we do not rehearse information we will lose this info within 15-20 seconds (depends on kind of information)
  • The longer the delay between presentation and recall, the more that is forgotten > decay
  • Decay is when you lose information due to time passing. Displacement is when you get a new information and replace old information with this (not much evidence for displacement)
  • Rehearsal = the process of repetitively verbalizing or thinking about the information
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Criticisms of STM

A
  • Decay is not the only reason for forgetting. Interference is a more likely contributor to forgetting than decay
  • Proactive interference: where something you learnt earlier interferes with something you learnt later
  • Retroactive interference: where something you learnt later interferes with something you learnt earlier
  • E.G. for PI, James dated Hannah first and this earlier knowledge may interfere with remembering his current partners name so calling his wife (Hannah) Jade.
  • E.G. for RI, calling his old girlfriend Hannah his current wife’s name because his new info is interfering with the old info
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Release from Proactive Interference

A
  • This happens when for example you do trials where you have to look at some letters, do a distractor task and then recall the letters (e.g. shown letters then have to count back 2 numbers from a given number then recall)
  • The first time you do this performance will be good, but the more you do it the worse you get > this is because there is proactive interference (earlier info inhibits performance for later info)
  • But if you change the kind of stimuli being used (e.g. swap from remembering letters to numbers) then there is a “release from PI” where you become accurate again
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Other criticism of STM component of multi-store model

A
  • Info in the STM does not need to consciously be processed > e.g. implicit learning (learning things without directly trying to)
    -Simple rehearsal does not ensure LTM storage > Rehearsed info does not necessarily transfer to LTM > Information in LTM has not necessarily been rehearsed during learning
  • Learning in STM affected by LTM (e.g. info from LTM can be helpful for chunking)
  • Double dissociation found in patients supports STM – LTM distinction > comes from patient data, some patients with severely impaired STM but intact LTM vice versa
    But some patients with severely impaired STM can still acquire LTM memories > contradicts MSM because it suggests things do not need to be rehearsed in STM to get to the LTM
    Solution: WMM > New model developed to address some criticisms of multi-store model
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Long-term memory

A
  • Once information passes from sensory to short-term memory, it can be encoded into long-term memory according to MSM
  • Function of LTM is to organise and store information using different system like explicit/declarative and implicit/non-declarative
    Capacity is assumed to be unlimited (don’t know if anyone has run out of LTM storage) and duration is expected to be permanent (although it cannot always be retrieved)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Working Memory

A
  • Proposed by Baddeley and Hitch (1974) > WMM provides depth of STM which the MSM lacks
  • They argue that we use STM not just for retention of info but used to perform more complex tasks (e.g. storing information about outcome of earlier processes) > STM is essential for the performance of numerous tasks (which aren’t explicit to memory) including understanding language, mental arithmetic, problem solving, reasoning etc..
  • Essentially WMM says STM is not a passive store + is responsible for different things
  • Argues STM is multi-component: short-term memory store comprises of 4 working memory components: Central executive (supervisory store), Phonological loop & visuo-spatial sketchpad (slave systems) and later added episodic buffer
  • Visuo-spatial sketchpad: if you are asked how many windows are there in your house, you would likely create an image in your mind of how your house and windows look > this is part of your visuo-spatial sketchpad. When you count each window, this involves your phonological loop
    You would not randomly start counting your windows, you are likely to use a strategy such as from the front of your house to the back of your house > this requires your central executive
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Components of WM

A
  • Central executive: Modality free meaning it can handle any type of sensory information regardless of whether it is visual/auditory etc > main pool of mental resources > Coding- visual+ acoustic
  • Supervisory store which delegates tasks and attention to certain slave systems
  • Supervisory store controlling and deciding what needs to be done but it has no storage of its own
  • Phonological loop: Deals with information which is phonological or speech based containing the inner ear and inner voice
  • Enables verbal rehearsal (needed for transfer to LTM)
  • Visuo-Spatial sketchpad: AKA the inner eye, dealing with + storing spatial and visual information
  • Spatial is defined as something related to space. If you have a good memory regarding the way a location is laid out and the amount of room it takes up, this is an example of a good spatial memory.
  • Episodic buffer: Holds + integrates information from the other components
17
Q

Evidence for WM

A
  • All components are relatively independent + have limited capacity
  • Dual-task experiments can show this
    Baddeley + Hitch found If 2 tasks use the same component + exceed the limited capacity, they cannot be performed successfully together but If 2 tasks use different components, it should be possible to perform them well together as you would separately > shows there are distinct components within the STM
18
Q

Phonological loop components

A
  • Temporary storage of speech-like information (“verbal STM”) + most studied component
  • 2 primary structures: phonological store (“inner ear”) > temporary storehouse, passive, limited in time (± 2 sec.) and capacity and code = speech-based > holds speech based information for a short time (2 secs) after 2 secs, this information starts to decay unless rehearsed
  • articulatory loop/process (“inner voice”) > active rehearsal component and linked to speech > in order to rehearse + keep info from phonological store, you rehearse using the articulatory loop > inner voice can rehearse in your mind or out loud
  • Purpose of this is: holding onto information + implicated in language acquisition device.
19
Q

Evidence: Phonological similarity effect

A
  • If you give people a list of letters + ask them to recall them they are more likely to make errors on phonologically similar items (e.g. mixing up S with F or B with G as opposed to mixing S with B because they are not phonologically similar)
  • More likely to misremember if items in list sound similar (i.e. are phonologically similar) > D B C T G P harder than K W T Q L or Mad cap man map harder than pen day cow bar (Baddeley, 1966)
  • Indicates that items in phonological store are stored based on a phonological code (speech based)
    The reason for getting the phonological similarity effect is that when things sound similar, it reduces the discriminability of the items (not as distinct)
20
Q

Evidence: Word length effect

A

-The memory span for short words is greater than for long words > we can recall more shorter words than longer words
- However, one confound is that shorter words tend to have fewer syllables > are you better at recalling short words as they have shorter syllables or is it because of the articulation duration (the time it takes to say the word)
- Could be that syllables are like units and the more units you have to store, the harder it is to recall them
- Longer words and longer articulation are negatively correlated (both increase together)
-Can test this using words with the same syllables but have different pronounciation making it shorter/longer
-The span for words like bishop and wicket (shorter articulation duration – 2 syllables) greater than for words like harpoon or labile (longer articulation duration – 2 syllables). > can recall shorter sounding words more than longer ones
-The span is as many words as the articulatory loop can actively rehearse within 2 seconds (so that it can be remembered)
- Thus: it is the articulation duration that matters > That is why people who have a language with a faster speaking rate (e.g. Chinese), seem to have a larger span – they can simply actively rehearse more words in the articulatory loop > not better memory but can actively rehearse words quicker > Chinese people do better on digit span tests as they rehearse quicker
Chinese people can say digits faster than English people and English say digits faster than Welsh > practical consequence of this is that IQ tests using digit span lead to children with slower articulation performing poorly (not due to IQ but due to lan)

21
Q

Evidence: Unattended speech effect

A
  • Performance is impaired if other verbal material needs to be ignored > e.g. if you need to do something or focus, other verbal materials (like music) will interfere with what you are trying to do which impairs performance (e.g. on a test)
    -Still happens with nonsense syllables, even if in different language, even with vocal music, less with instrumental music and not with (very loud) white noise (Salamé & Baddeley, 1982, 1989
  • Irrelevant spoken material can gain access to phonological store
    Filter to distinguish between noise and speech > when you hear logical speech based info (e.g. music w/ vocals, TV) this automatically gets processed in the phonological store and interferes with the task you are doing such as studying
22
Q

Evidence: Articulatory suppression

A
  • Articulatory suppression is preventing by overt/covert articulation
  • E.g. Saying “thethethethe …” while learning items (out loud or ‘in your head’)
  • Articulatory suppression makes it a lot harder to use the articulatory loop
    -Research shows that consequence of articulatory suppression is different depending on how the info was presented > whether the to-be-learned items are presented visually, or auditory.
    -This relates to the two ways that information can enter the phonological loop: auditory presented information has direct access to the phonological store (auditory things already are phonological + speech based), while visually presented information needs to be subvocally rehearsed first (visual things are not already phonological and need to be made phonological) > read the word, subvocally articulate it so it can then get to the phonological store
  • Articulatory suppression (saying “thethethethe …”) while learning items, when the to-be-learned items are presented visually, will: Result in the speaker not being able to use sub-vocal articulation > That is evident by the word length effect disappearing (this effect relies on sub-vocal articulation – see earlier)
  • Articulatory suppression (saying “thethethethe …”) while learning items, when the to-be-learned items are presented auditory, will: Have no effect on sub-vocal articulation, because the to-be-learned items have direct access to the phonological story > That is evident by the word length effect NOT disappearing
    Overall performance is worse when there is articulatory suppression because when you do two things at one performance is normally worse
23
Q

Visuo-Spatial Sketchpad

A
  • If you imagine the letter J and D and imagine the D is on top of the J. Next imagine rotating the D on top of the J = umbrella
  • Manipulating imaginary images is done in the visuo-spatial sketchpad
  • Limited capacity system for processing spatial, visual, and kinesthetic information. > kinesthetic = movement + sensation of own body
  • Contains two components: visual cache and inner scribe
  • Visual cache: visual information about shape & colour (the “what”).
  • Inner scribe: spatial & movement information (the “where”). > where something is located
  • Dual task exp show these two components are distinct from each other > when you do two tasks at one requiring both components + see if they interfere with performance or not
  • Function is the construction, maintenance, & manipulation of mental images > isomorphic relation to perceptual images. isomorphic means similar in shape, form etc but not exactly the same
24
Q

Evidence for Visuo-Spatial Sketchpad

A
  • For example, asking ppts to imagine a rabbit next to an elephant or a rabbit next to a fly. Ask does the rabbit have whiskers?. Ppts are quicker to respond in rabbit next to fly condition because here the rabbit is bigger and can be seen better as opposed to other condition > because it is larger it is easier to establish the different components of it
  • Mental scanning: Kosslyn had ppts learn an image of a map of an imaginary island + learning landmarks such as certain palm trees etc…
  • Then image was taken away + ppts were asked to go or “scan” from one landmark to another (e.g. from a well to the hut) + to press a button when they arrived at the destination
  • Found a linear increase in mental scanning related to the distance between the two landmarks > if on the actual map the distance was longer between landmarks, it also took them longer to imagine going from one place to the other > relative distance in map was comparable and similar to ppts mental image
  • Neurophysiological evidence: findings indicate that different brain areas are active during visual and spatial memory tasks but there is criticism that the visuo-spatial sketchpad interacts with other cognitive functions + systems such as the central executive so there are questions about how independent VSS is
25
Q

Central Executive

A
  • One of the most important components > an attentional system
  • Maintain task goals and goal-related information and use this to direct / bias your processing.
  • Attention capacity is limited. No storage + not modality specific
  • Most important and active component, but not as well understood. Tasks include: Directing attention to task, updating of task at hand, Switching/shifting between strategies and Selective attention & inhibition
    Probably in prefrontal cortex (but not exclusively) > Patients with frontal lobe damage: problems of attentional control
26
Q

Evidence for the CE

A
  • Dysexecutive syndrome: patients with dysexecutive syndrome have disruption to CE due to frontal lobe damage.
  • Symptoms are below but not all patients show the same patterns of symptoms (some show just perseverance e.g.) suggesting different parts of prefrontal cortex are responsible for different aspects of executive functioning
  • Perseverance: where they cannot interrupt ongoing schema (e.g. if asked to sort a deck of cards by suit, they can do this but cannot then sort by value while they are doing it) > they can tell you that what they are doing is wrong + how they could sort by value but cannot disengage so they keep following the old instruction
  • Utilisation behaviour: Fail to focus attention + respond automatically to cues in the environment (e.g. If they see a cup, they will just pick it up and drink from it or if a doctor examines a patient + sees a needle they will try and stab the doctor with it because that is what you do with needles)
  • Catatonia: Where you remain motionless and speechless for hours > indicates an inability to initiate schemas
  • Alzheimer patients: Problems with distribution attention between two tasks > if they have to do one task they are good at it but if they have to do two at the same time, there is a disproportionate decline in performance (e.g. can follow conversation with one person but not two)
  • Discussion of whether CE is unitary or whether there are different executive mechanisms involved (multiple executive system)
27
Q

Episodic Buffer

A
  • Integrates info received into a single complex structure or episode > phonological loop deals with auditory info + VSS deals with visual and spatial info but we want to combine all of this information at points (in everyday life we don’t get only visual or only auditory info we get both at the same time and EB enables us to integrate this info) > bind what we hear with what we see or what we smell or taste > binding happens in EB
  • Experiments show we can hold around 4 chunks of info in a multi-dimensional code
  • Buffer interacts with information we are perceiving in the world but also info regenerated from our LTM
28
Q

MSM vs WMM

A
  • Understanding of STM from the MSM has transformed + improved through the WMM > because according to MSM, we HAVE to rehearse to transfer info to LTM whereas WMM shows that rehearsal is not mandatory, it is optional (e.g. in phonological loop)
  • MSM argues forgetting is due to decay but WMM shows phonological similarity effect showing the impact of interference on forgetting
  • But, we cannot forget that we are all individuals and differ from each other > Individual differences research
29
Q

Individual Differences & WM Capacity

A
  • Everyone’s working memory capacity differs from each other + we can measure this (3 common measures)
  • Operation span: solve a maths question and then remember a word and keep doing this till you finish the words + questions > at the end you are tested on how many words you remember > this = operation span, indicating WM capacity
    -Reading span: ppts have to read different sentences (processing) and then remember the last word of it (storage) and test how many they remember, showing their reading span
  • e.g. “He had an odd elongated skull which sat on his shoulder like a pear on a dish”; “I turned my memories over like pictures in a photograph album” è remember dish and album > you then test how many words they remember
    -Important feature which is related to language comprehension > people with larger reading span tend to be better at comprehension (across the lifespan) > also implicated in language comprehension
  • Corsi block task: tests visual-spatial memory > pattern is tapped out on a set of blocks and you repeat the pattern (e.g. experimenter touches block 3,2,7 and you repeat)
  • WM correlates strongly to fluid intelligence (ability to reason, think flexibly)
    WM capacity relates to attentional control > People with higher memory capacity are more likely to be less distracted by external (e.g. noise) and internal stimuli (e.g. mind-wandering) + focus their control