cognition and development Flashcards
put forward his theory of cognitive development, he believed that children don’t know less than adults but instead just think differently and this develops over stages
piaget
put 9 to12 year-olds in groups to discuss how objects move down a slope, the knowledge and understanding of the children increased after this but crucially the children came to their own unique conclusions as to why
howe
showed that piaget’s questioning was flawed, when children were told a ‘naught teddy’ messed up the counters, children as young as 4 could conserve
mcgarrigle and donaldson
showed that if children as young as 5 had class inclusion explained to them they could understand which contradicted piaget’s belief that children could not understand that until 7
siegler and svetina
disproved egocentrism by finding out that children as young as 3 could position a doll in such a way that the policeman could not see it in mountains task
hughes
agreed with piaget that children develop cognition in stages but believed this happened due to social processes, claimed knowledge is first INTERMENTAL then INTRAMENTAL
vygotsky
asked a group of 4-5 year olds to guess the number of sweets in a box, initially their answers were poor but after being guided by older children their answers became more accurate
roazzi and bryant
observed 45 children at 16,26,44, and 54 months old and found that as they got older their mothers used less direct intervention, this means that adult assistance is well-described by concept of scaffolding
conner and cross
found that 7 year olds tutored by 10 year olds in association with whole class teaching and found that compared to a control group they performed better
van keer and verhaeghe
developed the violation of expectation technique to compare babies’ reactions to an unexpected event and an expected, also suggested we have an innate Physical Reasoning System
baillargeon
24 babies aged 5-6 months were shown an expected and unexpected condition, found babies looked at the unexpected condition for longer (33.07s) than the expected condition (25.11s) showed that babies understand object permanence at less than 6 months of age
baillargeon and graber
disagreed with piaget’s domain general approach to development and proposed that social perspective-taking develops separately from cognitive development
selman
also found that children of different ages responded in different ways and used this to create his levels of perspective taking
selman
observed child-parent interactions and in shops when parents refused to buy thing the child wants and found a negative correlation between age or perspective-taking and coercive behaviour, suggests a relationship between healthy social behaviour and perspective taking
buijzen and valkenburg
found that bullies displayed no difficulties in perspective taking, sometimes scoring even higher than victims, suggests that perspective taking is not a key element in healthy social development
gasser and keller