Class, Power and Crime Flashcards
In what way do Marxists agree with labelling theory?
The law is enforced disproportionately against the w/c and therefore the official crime stats cannot be taken at face value.
In what way do Marxists criticise labelling theory?
Fails to examine the wider structure of capitalism within which law making, law enforcement and offending take place.
Briefly explain how Marxists view capitalist society.
Divided into two classes:
- Ruling class (bourgeoisie) who own the means of production.
- W/c (proletariat), whose labour the bourgeoisie exploit to produce profit.
Explain what is meant by criminogenic.
Causing or likely to cause criminal behaviour.
Briefly outline three ways in which capitalism may lead to working-class crime.
- Poverty may mean that crime is the only way the w/c can survive.
- Crime may be the only way they can obtain the consumer goods encouraged by capitalist adverts, resulting in utilitarian crimes e.g theft.
- Alienation and lack of control over their lives may lead to frustration and aggression, resulting in non-utilitarian crimes e.g violence and vandalism.
According to Gordon, why is crime found in all social classes in capitalist society?
Crime is a rational response to the capitalist system and hence it’s found in all social classes even though official stats make it appear to be a largely w/c crime.
According to Marxists, whose interests do law making and law enforcement serve?
Capitalist class. For example, Chambliss argues that laws to protect private property are the cornerstone of capitalist society.
Use the example of East African colonies to explain the Marxist view of law.
At the time, the local economy wasn’t a money economy so to force reluctant African pop. to work for them, British introduced a tax payable by cash, non-payment was punishable offense. Cash to pay taxes was only available by working on plantations therefore law served economic interests of capitalist plantation owners.
According to Snider, what laws is the state reluctant to pass?
Laws that regulate the activities of businesses or threaten their profitability.
According to Marxists, who is criminalised by the justice system?
W/c and ethnic minorities.
According to Pearce, why are some laws passed that seem to benefit the working-class?
They benefit r/c too. E.g by giving capitalism a ‘caring’ face, such as laws also create false consciousness among the workers.
Why are some laws not rigorously enforced? Give an example.
Despite a new law against corporate homicide being passed in 2007, in its first 8 years there was only one successful prosecution of a UK company - despite large numbers of deaths at work estimated to be caused by employers’ negligence.
What is the impact of selective law enforcement?
Crime appears to be a w/c phenomenon which divides w/c by encouraging workers to blame the criminals in their midst of problems, rather than capitalism.
How do the media and criminologists contribute to the portrayal of criminals?
They portray criminals as disturbed individuals, thereby concealing the fact that it’s the nature of capitalism that makes people criminal.
Briefly explain the positive aspects of Marxists theory.
Shows link between law making and enforcement and interests of the capitalist class.
By doing so, it puts into a wider structural context the insights of labelling theory regarding the selective enforcement of the law.
Briefly outline the five criticisms of Marxist theory.
- Largely ignores relationship between crime and non-class inequalities e.g ethnicity and gender.
- Too deterministic and over-predicts amount of crime in w/c: not all poor people commit crime, despite pressures of poverty.
- Not all capitalist societies have high crime rates: e.g homicide rate in Japan + Switzerland is roughly 1/5 of that in the US.
- CJS does sometimes act against interests of capitalist class e.g prosecutions for corporate crime do occur. (However, Marxists argue that such occasional prosecutions perform an ideological function in making system seem impartial).
- Left realists argue Marxism ignores intra-class crimes such as burglary and ‘mugging’, which cause great harm to victims.