Chapter 9 Powerpoint pt. 3 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

17th century, juveniles were divided into what three categories?

A

(1) Under 7 years; lack capacity to form intent
(2) Between 7 and 14 years; assumed to lack capacity, but is rebuttable at court
(3) Over 14 years; possess adult capacity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Early _______ ____ did not recognize infancy as a defense, but youthful offenders were typically pardoned.

A

common law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Early common law did not recognize _______ as a defense, but youthful offenders were typically ________.

A

infancy

pardoned

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

There is a growing trend for state statutes to permit the criminal prosecution of any juvenile as an adult who is charged with a ________ offense.

A

serious

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Duress= __________ ______ of + an imminent threat by another + of death or severe bodily harm + against the defendant

A

reasonable belief

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Duress= reasonable belief of + an imminent ______ by _______ + of death or severe bodily harm + against the defendant

A

threat

another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Duress= reasonable belief of + an imminent threat by another + of ______ or _______ ______ ____ + against the defendant

A

death

severe bodily harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Duress= reasonable belief of + an imminent threat by another + of death or severe bodily harm + against the __________

A

defendant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Duress; common law excused guilt from those who committed a crime to avoid imminent ______ or ______ _____.

A

death

bodily harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

_______; common law excused guilt from those who committed a crime to avoid imminent death or bodily harm.

A

Duress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Duress; those who commit crime in response to a severe threat lack ______.

A

intent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Those who commit crime under _______ act in an involuntary manner.

A

duress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Those who commit crime under duress act in an __________ manner.

A

involuntary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Why do we have the duress defense?

A

(1) Realism
(2) Criminal Intent
(3) Criminal Act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

The defendant’s actions, under duress, are to be judged in accordance with a __________ ________ standard.

A

reasonable person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Most states also recognize that a threat directed against a member of a defendant’s family or a third party may constitute _______, but ____________ _________ or _________ does not amount to a threat.

A

duress
psychological pressure
blackmail

17
Q

Most states also recognize that a threat directed against a member of a defendant’s ______ or a ______ ______ may constitute duress, but psychological pressure or blackmail does not amount to a threat.

A

family

third party

18
Q

True or False: Duress does not excuse the intentional taking of the life of another.

A

True

19
Q

In order to prove duress the threat must be _________ and ________.

A

immediate

imminent

20
Q

In order to prove duress, an individual must have exhausted all reasonable and available ___________ to violating the law.

A

alternatives

21
Q

In order to prove duress, the defendant must not ______ or ______ in ________ the circumstances leading to the claim of duress.

A

create
assist
creating

22
Q

Married women were exempted from liability under the ________ ____, but this is no longer the case today.

A

common law

23
Q

True or False: Individuals exerting the coercion are liable as a principal in the crime despite the fact that the perpetrator may be excused on the basis of duress.

A

True

24
Q

Inmates relying on duress must establish that they did not use _____ or _______ toward prison personnel or other innocent individuals in the escape and that they immediately contacted __________ once having reached a point of safety.

A

force
violence
authorities

25
Q

Inmates relying on duress must establish that they did not use force or violence toward ______ __________ or other ________ ___________ in the escape and that they immediately contacted authorities once having reached a point of _______.

A

prison personnel
innocent individuals
safety

26
Q

Inmates relying on ________ must establish that they did not use force or violence toward prison personnel or other innocent individuals in the escape and that they immediately contacted authorities once having reached a point of safety

A

duress

27
Q

What are some of the criticisms that critics have for the duress defense?

A

Critics argue that individuals should follow legal rules, even under conditions of stress and strain and that the law should encourage people to resist rather than conform to the demands of violent and forceful individuals.

28
Q

Mistake of ____= no excuse (some indication may excuse criminal liability in cases involving notice, intent, reliance )

A

law

29
Q

Mistake of _____= mistake is an excuse if it negates the required criminal intent (may require reasonable mistake)

A

fact

30
Q

Mistake of law= __ ______ (some indication may excuse criminal liability in cases involving notice, intent, reliance )

A

no excuse

31
Q

Mistake of fact= mistake is an ______ if it negates the required _______ _______ (may require reasonable mistake)

A

excuse

criminal intent

32
Q

Mistake of law; “Ignorantia lexis non excusat” means?

A

ignorance of law is no excuse

33
Q

What are the four elements that mistake of law is based on?

A

(1) Knowledge
(2) Evidence
(3) Public Policy
(4) Uniformity

34
Q

Which cases showed exceptions to mistake of law?

A

(1) Lambert v. California
(2) United States v. Cheek
(3) Cox v. Louisiana

35
Q

____ v. ______, an individual is not liable when he or she lacked a willful intent to violate the law

A

U.S.

Cheek

36
Q

____ v. _________, an individual is not liable when that individual relied on an official statement of the law

A

Cox

Louisiana

37
Q

When does the Model Penal Code recognize an ignorance of law defense?

A

When the defendant does not know the law and the law has not been published or made reasonably available to the public (notice)

38
Q

An individual may be mistaken but still found criminally liable in the event that the facts as __________ by the defendant still comprise a crime.

A

perceived