Chapter 7 - Positive Organizational Behavior and Psychological Capital Flashcards
1
Q
Positive Organizational Behavior (POB)
A
- the study and application of positive oriented human resource strengths and psychological capacities that can be measured, developed, and effectively managed for performance improvement in today’s workplace.
- Based on theory and research
- Valid measures
- “State-like” and thus open to development
- Managed for performance improvement
2
Q
Four Positive Psychological Resources
A
HERO:
- hope
- efficacy
- resiliency
- optimism
3
Q
Positive Psychology
A
- is to use scientific methodology to discover and promote the factors that allow individuals, groups, organizations, and communities to thrive
- It is concerned with optimal human functioning instead of pathological human functioning
4
Q
Three levels of Positive Psychology
A
- Valued subjective experiences (Well-being, contentment, and satisfaction (in the past); hope and optimism (for the future); and flow and happiness (in the present).
- Positive individual traits (The capacity for love and vocation, courage, interpersonal skill, aesthetic sensibility, perseverance, forgiveness, originality, future mindedness, spirituality, high talent, and wisdom
- Civic virtues and the institutions that move individuals toward better citizenship (Responsibility, nurturance, altruism, civility, moderation, tolerance, and work ethic)
5
Q
H-R-W well-being
A
- Health (both physical and mental)
- Relationships (both intimate and social)
- Work (both performance and satisfaction)
- interactive, reciprocal determination between one’s health, relationships, and work
- Figure 7.1 page 174
6
Q
Sonja Lyubomirsky’s H-R-W well-being determination
A
- Half is attributed to a genetic, dispositional “hard-wiring”
- About 10 percent seems to be the result of life’s circumstances
- The remaining 40 percent of one’s happiness, positivity, or H-R-W well-being is is determined by intentional activity
7
Q
self-efficacy
A
- Confidence
- refers to an individual’s ability to execute courses of action required to deal with prospective situations
- state-like and open for development
8
Q
self-reflection
A
- people reflect back on their actions/experience with a specific event/task to then cognitively process how strongly they believe they can successfully accomplish this event/ task in the future
- that serves as the theoretical basis for self-efficacy
9
Q
Specific Self-Efficacy
A
- is state-like
- is highly variable depending on the specific task and is cognitively processed by the individual before any effort is expended
10
Q
General Efficacy
A
- trait-like
- is the opposite of specific self-efficacy
- is relatively stable over time and across situations
- is like a personality trait
11
Q
Self-efficacy vs. self-esteem
A
- self-esteem is a global construct of one’s evaluation and belief of overall worthiness, whereas self-efficacy is one’s belief about a task-and context-specific capability
- self-esteem is stable and trait-like, whereas self-efficacy is changing over time as new information and task experiences are gained and developed and is state-like
- self-esteem is aimed at any aspect of one’s current self, whereas self-efficacy is a current assessment of one’s future success at a task
12
Q
Self-efficacy vs. expectancy concepts
A
- Both involve perceptions of ability, skill, knowledge, experience with the specific task, complexity of the task
- effort-performance expectancy - psychomotor reactions such as emotions, stress, and physical fatigue
- with behavior-outcome expectancy is a judgment of the probable consequence such behavior will produce an outcome
- the individual’s self-efficacy evaluation will usually come before any behavior outcome expectancies are even considered
13
Q
Self-efficacy vs. attribution/locus of control
A
- Those who make internal attributions about their behavior and its consequences (success or failure) believe they are in control of their own fate (e.g., “It is my effort or ability that makes the difference”) and assume personal responsibility for the consequences of their behavior
- Externals, on the other hand, make attributions to the circumstances (“The task was too hard”) or to luck and do not take personal responsibility for the consequences of their behavior
- locus of control attributions are causal beliefs about action-outcome contingencies, whereas self-efficacy is an individual’s belief about his or her abilities and cognitive resources that can be marshaled together to successfully execute a specific task
14
Q
Self-Efficacy evaluation/perception
A
- Choice behaviors - The decision to perform the specific task in this context
- Motivational effort - The amount of effort that will be expended to accomplish the task
- Perseverance - The level of persistence that will be forthcoming despite problems, disconfirming evidence, and adversity. those with high self-efficacy will bounce back, be resilient when meeting problems or even failure, whereas those with low self-efficacy tend to give up when obstacles appear
- Facilitative thought patterns - efficacy judgments influence self-talks such as those with high self-efficacy might say to themselves
- Vulnerability to stress - those with low self-efficacy tend to experience stress and burnout because they expect failure, whereas those with high self-efficacy enter into potential stressful situations with confidence and assurance and thus are able to resist
stressful reactions
15
Q
Profile of a High Performer
A
- highly efficacious individual who really gets into the task
- gives whatever effort it takes to successfully accomplish the task
- perseveres when meeting obstacles, frustrations, or setbacks
- has positive self-thoughts and talks; and is resistant to stress and burnout
- expect to succeed and gain favorable, positive outcome incentives
- focus on the opportunities worth pursuing, and view obstacles as surmountable
16
Q
Sources of Efficacy (page 178-180)
Also Figure 7.1 page 181
A
- Mastery experiences or performance attainments
- Vicarious Experiences or Modeling
- Social Persuasion
- Physiological and Psychological Arousal
17
Q
Implications of Self-Efficacy for Effective Training #1 Mastery experience and performance attainment
A
Trainees must learn they are the cause of their performance.
- Plenty of practice so mastery (as defined by the training objectives) is reached
- Break learning into series of obtainable endpoints to help self-confirmation of skills.
- Provide feedback on progress (not shortfalls) and contributions