Chapter 11 - Groups and Teams Flashcards
Group dynamics
- the interactions and forces among group members in social situations
- the focus is on the dynamics of members of both formal or informal work groups and, now, teams in the organization
Generational Stereotypes
- Millennial Generation has been stereotyped as being entitled, self-centered, and informal
- Generation Y are also tech savvy, like constant social interaction, are proficient multitaskers, and strive to maintain a work-life balance
Group (It’s members are):
- Are motivated to join
- Perceive the group as a unified unit of interacting people
- Contribute in various amounts to the group processes (that is, some people contribute more time or energy to the group than do others)
- Reach agreements and have disagreements through various forms of interaction
Kurt Lewin’s definition of Group Dynamics
- One normative view is that group dynamics describes how a group should be organized and conducted
- Democratic leadership, member participation, and overall cooperation are stressed
- consists of a set of techniques
- role playing, brainstorming, focus groups, leaderless groups, group therapy, sensitivity training, team building, transactional analysis, and the Johari window are traditionally equated with group dynamics
- Group dynamics are viewed from the perspective of the internal nature of groups, how they form, their structure and processes, and how they function and affect individual members, other groups, and the organization
creative abrasion vs. personal abrasion
- the search for a clash of ideas over the clash of people
- goal is to develop greater creativity from the group
Propinquity
- individuals affiliate with one another because of spatial or geographical proximity
- Example: students sitting next to one another in class
balance theory of group formation
- persons are attracted to one another on the basis of similar attitudes toward commonly relevant objects and goals.
- Once this relationship is formed, the participants strive to maintain a symmetrical balance between the attraction and the common attitudes
- If an imbalance occurs, an attempt is made to restore the balance
- If the balance cannot be restored, the relationship dissolves
exchange theory of groups
- is based on reward-cost outcomes of interaction
- A minimum positive level (rewards greater than costs) of an outcome must exist in order for attraction or affiliation to take place. Rewards from interactions gratify needs, whereas costs incur anxiety, frustration, embarrassment, or fatigue. Propinquity, interaction, and common attitudes all have roles in exchange theory
Group Formation Stages
- Forming
- Storming
- Norming
- Performing
- Adjourning
Forming
- This initial stage is marked by uncertainty and even confusion. Group members are not sure about the purpose, structure, task, or leadership of the group
Storming
- This stage of development, as indicated by the term, is characterized by conflict and confrontation. (In the usually emotionally charged atmosphere, there may be considerable disagreement and conflict among the members about roles and duties.
Norming
- Finally, in this stage the members begin to settle into cooperation and collaboration. They have a “we” feeling with high cohesion, group identity, and camaraderie.
Performing
- This is the stage where the group is fully functioning and devoted to effectively accomplishing the tasks agreed on in the norming stage.
Adjourning
This represents the end of the group, which in ongoing, permanent groups will never be reached. However, for project teams or task forces with a specific
objective, once the objective is accomplished, the group will disband or have a
new composition, and the stages will start over again.
Practicalities of Group Formation
- Work together for reward (gainsharing)
- Form a union for higher wages
- satisfy intense social needs (affiliation)
punctuated equilibrium model
- groups form in a first phase in which a target or mission is set and then are not altered very easily, due to a process called inertia, or systematic resistance to change
- Midpoint phase - group members recognize that if they don’t change tactics, the group’s goal or mission will not be (midlife crisis, bursts of activity and energy)
Differences in groups
- demographic diversity and globalization are key factors
- Diversity is the primary source of differences in member characteristics leading to such conflict
Types of Groups
- dyad group (group of two)
- small and large groups
- primary and secondary groups
- coalitions,
- membership and reference groups, in- and out-groups, and formal and informal groups
- family and the peer group
self-managed teams
- team members work together to perform a function or produce a product or service.
- also perform functions such as planning, organizing, and controlling the work
- do not necessarily always make consensus decisions
Characteristics of Coalitions
- Interacting group of individuals
- Deliberately constructed by the members for a specific purpose
- Independent of the formal organization’s structure
- Lacking a formal internal structure
- Mutual perception of membership
- Issue-oriented to advance the purposes of the members
- External forms
- Concerted member action, act as a group
in-groups and out-groups
- an in-group is a social group to which a person psychologically identifies as being a member. By contrast, an out-group is a social group with which an individual does not identify.
- In-groups are those who have or share the dominant values, and out-groups are those on the outside looking in
conditions that promote group effectiveness
(1) setting a compelling direction for the group’s work
(2) designing and enabling group structure
(3) ensuring that the group operates within a supportive context
(4) providing expert coaching
Factors That Increase Group Cohesiveness
Table 11.1 page 314
- Agreement on group goals
- Frequency of interaction
- Personal attractiveness
- Intergroup competition
- Favorable evaluation
Factors That Decrease Group Cohesiveness
Table 11.1 page 314
- Disagreement on goals
- Large group size
- Unpleasant experiences
- Intragroup competition
- Domination by one or more members