Chapter 4: Organizational Context: Reward Systems Flashcards
Why are rewards systems important?
- In social cognitive theory, reward consequences or contingencies play an important role in organizational behavior.
- An organization may have the latest technology, well-designed structures, and a visionary strategic plan, but unless the people at all levels are rewarded, all these other things may become hollow and not be carried out for performance improvement.
- emphasize the emerging importance of human capital
- Because intellectual/ human capital is now recognized as being central to competitive advantage in the new paradigm environment, attention must be given to rewarding this capital to sustain/ retain it and leverage it
Money: four of the important symbolic attributes
1) achievement and recognition
2) status and respect
3) freedom and control
4) power
Money affects:
motivation, job attitudes, and retention
In particular, money helps people attain both physical (clothing, automobiles, houses) and psychological (status, self-esteem, a feeling of achievement) objectives
Agency Theory
- agency theory is concerned with the diverse interests and goals that are held by a corporation’s stakeholders (stockholders, managers, employees) and the methods by which the enterprise’s reward system is used to align these interests and goals
- widely recognized finance and economics approach to understanding behavior by individuals and groups both inside and outside the corporation
- The theory draws its name from the fact that the people who are in control of large corporations are seldom the owners; rather, in almost every case, they are agents who are responsible for representing the interests of the owners
- Agency theory also examines the role of risk and how owners and managers may vary in their approach to risk taking.
Pay for Performance
- One study showed that the greater the pay spread, the worse the players performed
- a growing number of corporate shareholders are demanding that the chief executive officer pay be tied to a multiple of the lowest worker’s pay, thus controlling the range between the lowest and highest paid person in the organization
- A public poll indicated that a vast majority (87 percent) believe that executives “had gotten rich at the expense of ordinary workers
- overall, reward does not decrease intrinsic motivation
Effective Pay System Requirements
- The organization must clarify it’s goals (increased sales, higher profits, more market share).
- Results must be measurable
- Tie rewards to the outcomes
Base Wages or Salary Approach
- the amount of money that an individual is paid on an hourly, weekly, monthly, or annual basis
- If base pay is not in line with the market rate, organizations may find that they are unable to hire and retain many of their personnel
Merit Pay Approach
- employees a cost-of-living allowance and then allocate additional funds for those who are judged “meritorious.”
- the criteria for determining merit are often unclear
- difficult to quantify merit pay criteria
Individual Incentive Pay Plans
- individual incentive plans also pay people based on output or even quality.
- Some might include a combination payment plan in which the individual receives a guaranteed amount of money, regardless of how the person performs
- provide a “drawing account” against which the individual can take money and then repay it out of commissions
Bonuses
- Bonus pay for KPI’s met
- most companies are moving to bonus pay based on performance rather than fixed pay increases
Stock Options
- Option to buy company stock in the future at a predetermined fixed price
- if the executives are successful in their efforts to increase organizational performance, stock price will also increase
Pay for Performance - Potential Limitations
- one problem with bonuses and stock options is that they may have led to the excesses and ethical breakdowns experienced by too many firms in recent years
- The results of a study indicate that stock options prompt CEOs to take high-variance risks (not simply larger risks), but importantly it was also found that option loaded CEOs deliver more big losses than big gains
- measurement of KPI is another limitation
- narrow range of behaviors focused on bonus KPI’s
- individual incentive plans may pit employees against one another that may promote healthy competition, or it may erode trust and teamwork
Group Incentive Plans Types
- gainsharing plans
- profit sharing
- employee stock ownership plan (ESOP)
Gainsharing Plans
- share with the group or team the net gains from productivity improvements such as reduced product damage, customer complaints, accidents, or shipping errors.
- if everyone works to reduce cost and increase productivity, the organization will become more efficient and have more money to reward its personnel
- The first step is to determine the costs associated with producing the current output
- Then, at some predetermined point, such as six months, costs and output are measured and productivity savings are determined
- These gainsharing savings are then passed on to the employees, say, on a 75:25 basis
Profit-sharing Plans
- typically some portion of the company’s profits is paid into a profit-sharing pool then distributed to all employees.
- Some plans defer the profit share, put it into an escrow account, and invest it for the employee until retirement