Chapter 10 - Power and Politics Flashcards
Definition of Power
There is a ton of other definitions, see page 281
Chester Barnard defined power in terms of “informal authority,” and many organizational sociologists define authority as “legitimate power.”
- Authority legitimatizes and is a source of power
- Power need not be legitimate
- The polar opposite, power, is the pursuit of individual or particularistic goals associated with group compliance
Authority
Chester Barnard
- the character of a communication (order) in a formal organization by virtue of which it is accepted by a contributor to or ‘member’ of the organization as governing the action he contributes
- What legitimizes authority is the promotion or pursuit of collective goals that are associated with group consensus.
Influence
- broader in scope than power
- the ability to alter other people in general ways, such as by changing their satisfaction and performance
- is more closely associated with leadership than power is, but both obviously are involved in the leadership process
Authority vs. Power vs. Influence
- Authority is different from power because of its legitimacy and acceptance,
- Influence is broader than power, but it is so conceptually close that the two terms can be used interchangeably
Five Classic Types of Power
- Reward
- Coercive
- Legitimate
- Referent
- Expert
Reward Power
- based on a person’s ability to control resources and reward others
- the target of this power must value these rewards
- pay increases, promotions, valuable information, favorable work assignments, more responsibility, new equipment, praise, feedback, and recognition
Coercive Power
- source of power depends on fear
- ability to inflict punishment or aversive consequences
- or to make threats that the other person believes will result in punishment or undesirable outcomes
- subordinates are less likely to retaliate against abusive supervisors due to coercive power
- ability to fire or demote people who work for them, or
dock their pay
Legitimate Power
- stems from the internalized values of the other persons that give the legitimate right to the agent to influence them
- almost identical to authority and is closely aligned with both reward and coercive power because the person with legitimacy is also in a position to reward and punish
- is unlike reward and coercive power in that it does not depend on the relationships with others but rather on the position or role that the person holds
Three Sources of Legitimate Power
- The prevailing cultural values of a society, organization, or group determine what is legitimate
- The accepted social structure
- Being designated as the agent or representative of a powerful person or group (i.e. Elected Officials)
Referent Power
- the desire on the part of the other persons to identify with the agent wielding power
- People want to identify with the powerful person
- Others grant the person power because he or she is attractive and has desirable resources or personal characteristics (Celebrities)
Expert Power
- based on the extent to which others attribute knowledge and expertise to the power holder
- Experts are perceived to have knowledge or understanding only in certain well-defined areas
- the target must perceive the agent to be credible, trustworthy, and relevant before expert power is granted
- staff specialists have expert power in their functional areas but not outside them
Credibility
- the person must really know what he or she is talking about and be able to show tangible evidence of this knowledge.
- significant positive impact that credibility has
on perceived power
Information Power
- A person who controls the flow of information and/or interprets data before it is presented to others has such information power
- Information power is distinguished from expert power because the individual merely needs to be in the “right place” to affect the flow and/or distribution of information, rather than having some form of expertise over the generation or interpretation of the information
Power Relationships
- the sources of power are interrelated
- for example, the use of coercive power by managers may reduce their referent power
- high coercive and reward power may lead to reduced expert power
- the same person may exercise different types of power under different circumstances and at different times
Contingency Approaches to Power
- Control over resources such as budgets, physical facilities, and positions that can be used to cultivate allies and supporters
- Control over or extensive access to information about the organization’s activities, about the preferences and judgments of others, about what is going on, and about who is doing it
- Formal authority
Contingency Conclusions to Power
- The greater the professional orientation of group members, the greater relative strength referent power has in influencing them.
- The less effort and interest high-ranking participants are willing to allocate to a task, the more likely lower ranking participants are to obtain power relevant to this task
Influenceability of the Targets of Power
- Power involves a reciprocal relationship between the agent and the target, important characteristics of the influenceability of targets:
1. Dependency
2. Uncertainty
3. Personality
4. Intelligence
5. Gender
6. Age
7. Culture
Influenceability of Dependency
when a target cannot escape a relationship, perceives no alternatives, or values the agent’s rewards as unique
Influenceability of Uncertainty
the more uncertain people are about the appropriateness or correctness of a behavior, the more likely they are to be influenced to change that behavior
Influenceability of Personality
- people who cannot tolerate ambiguity or who are highly anxious are more susceptible to influence, and those with high needs for affiliation are more susceptible to group influence
- both positive and negative relationships have been found between self-esteem and influenceability.
Influenceability of Intelligence
- There is no simple relationship between intelligence and influenceability. Highly intelligent people may be more willing to listen, but, because they also tend to be held in high esteem, they also may be more resistant to influence
Influenceability of Gender
As women’s and society’s views of the role of women are changing, there is less of a distinction of influenceability by gender
Influenceability of Age
Social psychologists have generally concluded that susceptibility to influence increases in young children up to about the age of eight or nine and then decreases with age until adolescence when it levels off
Influenceability of Culture
The cultural values of a society have a tremendous impact on the influenceability of its people
Overall Contingency Model for Power - Compliance
- the target will comply in order to gain a favorable reaction or avoid a punishing one from the agent
- This is the process that most supervisors in work organizations must rely on
- In order for compliance to work supervisors must be able to reward and punish and keep an eye on them
Overall Contingency Model for Power - Identification
- People will identify not in order to obtain a favorable reaction from the agent, as in compliance, but because it is self-satisfying to do so
- in order for the identification process to work, the agent must have referent power—be very attractive to the target—and be salient
Overall Contingency Model for Power - Internalize
- People will internalize because of compatibility with their own value structure.
- in order for people to internalize, the agent must have expert or legitimate power (credibility) and, in addition, be relevant
- this process of power is most effective
- This internalization would be especially desirable in today’s highly autonomous, flat organizations with cultures of openness, empowerment, and trust
McClelland - Two Kinds of Power
- Personal Power
2. Social Power
Personal Power
- People with this personalized power concern are more apt to speed, have accidents, and get into physical fights.
- Power-hungry
- negative use of power
- primarily looking out for themselves and how they can get ahead
- they are”I” oriented
- is primitive and does indeed have negative consequences