Chapter 4: Theoretical and Measurement Issues in Trait Psychology Flashcards
what are some of the issues with using personality self-reports to match people on dating sites, select people for school/job admission, etc.
- can we make accurate predictions about a person’s future based on their traits?
- is there a way to detect if someone is lying on a personality questionnaire
- are people motivated to lie on personality questionnaires for their benefit
what are the three assumptions that trait theories make about personality traits
- meaningful individual differences
- stability/consistency over time
- consistency across situations
what are trait psychologists primarily interested in
how are people different from each other –> this is why trait psychology is sometimes called “differential psychology”
describe the research approach of the trait perspective
- quantitative approach –> how much does a given individual differ from average
- mathematically/statistically oriented
- argue that by combining a few primary traits, they can distill qualities of every individual (every personality is a product of particular combinations of traits)
describe the assumption that personality is consistent over time
- traits that are thought to have a biological basis are consistent (while attitudes/interests/opinions are not stable)
- way in which a trait manifests in actual behaviour might change substantially (e.g. a child who is disagreeable will throw tantrums as a child, but have trouble holding a job as an adult)
what are some traits that decrease in intensity with age
activity level, impulsivity, sociopathy, general criminal tendencies
describe the concept of rank order
if all people show a decrease in a particular trait at the same rate over time, they may still maintain the same rank order relative to each other –> can account for general change with age by subtracting/adding a constant to each person’s score on a measure
describe the rank order of impulsivity
people in general show a decrease in impulsiveness as they get older, but those who are most impulsive at an earlier age are still the ones who are most impulsive at a later age
what has been a hot debate in personality psychology
whether given traits are stable across situations –> even if a person is really friendly, there are some situations where the person will not act friendly (e.g. they will be friendly at a party but not at a library)
what has research found of the consistency of “honesty” across situations
children who cheated in a field game at camp were not more likely to cheat on an exam at school –> suggests low cross-situational correlations for helpfulness and self-control
describe the position of situationism
researchers should not focus on personality traits because these change from situation to situation –> it is situational differences bringing about these changes
what are the two most lasting changes that trait psychologists have embraced
- person-situation interaction
- practice of aggregation (averaging)
describe the position that Gladwell takes on why people are successful (in his book “Outliers”)
- exceptional people get special opportunities or life situations that give them some advantage
- exposure to critical life situations at the right time is what matters to a person’s success
- nothing to do with a person’s traits
- but clearly this isn’t always the case…
describe the formula for person-situation interaction
- behaviour is function of personality traits [B = f (P)]
- Behaviour is a function of situational forces [B = f (S)]
- personality and situations interact to produce behaviour: B = f (P × S) –> behaviour is a function of the interaction between trait and situation
what kinds of statements can be used to outline person-situation interactions
“if…if…then…”
–> e.g. if the vending machine isn’t working and if the person has a hot temper, then aggression will result
–> e.g. if a woman is friendly, and is interacting with another woman, she will be more friendly than a man
what is situational specificity
a person acts in a specific way under particular circumstances
why are some trait-situation interactions rare
- the kinds of situations that elicit behaviour related to these traits are themselves rate
- e.g. hard to see courageousness unless there is a specific situation requiring courageousness
what is a strong situation
- one where nearly everyone reacts in the same way –> e.g. death of a family member
- some of these situations create uniformity in behaviour
what happens in weak situations
these weak/ambiguous situations are when personality has its strongest influence on behaviour –> e.g. Rorschach inkblot test is a weak/ambiguous situation
what are the three ways personality traits can interact with situations
- situational selection
- evocation
- manipulation
what is situational selection
- tendency to choose the situations in which one finds oneself –> e.g. do you choose to run by yourself or play interactive/group games
- people typically choose situations that fit their personalities
describe how the relationship between persons and situations is bidirectional
- personality can influence the situations people enter into, but situations can also influence peoples’ responses
- e.g. people asked to be extraverted in group setting rated having more positive emotions in the discussions (regardless of the person’s actual trait of extraversion)
what is evocation
- certain personality traits may evoke specific responses from the environment
- people may create their own environments by eliciting certain responses from others
- e.g. people who are disagreeable and manipulative may evoke hostility and avoidance from others
what is “evocation” similar to
“transference” in psychoanalysis –> e.g. a boring person causes the therapist to feel bored, which gives evidence to the therapist of potential relationship issues that the person is having (she is also boring her partners)
what is manipulation
- various means by which people influence the behaviour of others –> intentional use of tactics
- altering environments already inhabited
- e.g. using a “charm tactic” by complimenting others and acting warm to influence them
describe an example of aggregation in personality
you might choose to marry someone because they are cheerful (on average), but there will definitely be days where they are not cheerful –> what matters most to you though is their average mood
describe why questionnaires assessing aggregation of personality are more accurate
- aggregating several questions or observations results in better trait measures and longer tests are more reliable
- e.g. if you are asked “how many times this year have you stopped to help someone stuck in snow”, but you live in a place where it never snows, you might look unhelpful –> need more questions to tap this trait
what is the Spearnman-Brown prophecy formula
determines precisely how much a test’s reliability will increase as it is made longer