Chapter 4 Flashcards
cooperative principle
a psycholinguistic term that assumes that we strive to communicate with one another sincerely and effectively when engage in a conversation
Grice’s four maxims that guide cooperative principle conversations are
quality, quantity, relevance, and manner
maxim of quality
all of these:
- tell the truth
- a communicative presumption that suggests that we tell each other the truth when we engage in a conversation
maxim of quantity
all of these:
- say about as much as appropriate for the situation
- a communicative presumption that suggests that we contribute an appropriate amount of talk when we engage in a conversation
- In normal conversations, two speakers are generally expected to contribute equally.
- In some contexts, it is appropriate for one person to dominate the conversation. For example: interviewee in a television interview/talk show; a client in a therapy session
maxim of relevance
all of these:
- stick to the topic
- a communicative presumption that suggests that our discussion is relevant to the conversation
maxim of manner
all of these:
- speak to your partner in an appropriate manner
- a communicative presumption that suggests that we are clear in our language and that we pay attention to normal standards of conversation, such as not shouting at someone who is right in front of us
In the United States, the appropriate distance between two people engaging in a typical conversation is about
1 1/2 feet. It would violate the maxim of manner to stand 6 inches from that person’s face, and it would also be a violation if you were to stand 10 feet away
maxim of relations with conversation partner
a communicative presumption that suggests that we use our previous relationship with our conversation partner so that we do not have to repeat shared experiences
maxim of rule violations
a communicative presumption that suggests that we signal our conversational partners when we are about to engage in a violation of one of the other maxims
Different cultures can have different conversational rules, but they likely have similar general maxims that guide their behavior. The greatest variation occurs in
the maxim of manner because differ rules govern what is an appropriate and or an inappropriate manner.
proxemics
personal space in conversations
Conversational partners in other cultures tend to stand or sit closer to each other when interacting than do those in the
United States and other Western countries
Asians tend to stand farther away from each other while talking than their
American counterparts
When talking with someone from a different culture, a person can find it
difficult to determine a comfortable talking distance
kinesics
bodily movements in conversations, including hand gestures, facial expressions, and eye contact
People of different cultures tend seem to engage in varying levels of
eye contact
People from Arabic cultures tend to gaze longer and more directly than do
the people from the United States
Within the United States, African Americans gaze less directly than their
European American counterparts do. American Indians tend to make even less eye contact and prefer a side-by-side orientation to a face-to-face orientation
Not having a great deal of eye contact is
different from avoiding eye contact
There are cultural differences in avoidance of eye contact when there is a
conflict. This is a NEGLECT STYLE of dealing with conflict
In general, smiling is an indication of happiness, liking, and other positive feelings. However, Asian cultures may also use smiling as a way of
discharging uncomfortable feelings
Kinesics tend to be more synchronized in
collectivistic cultures. In individualistic cultures, people are allowed to do their own thing and not coordinate their movements with others as much
Collectivistic cultures will foster emotional displays of their members that maintain and facilitate group cohesion, harmony, or cooperation, to a greater degree than
individualistic cultures
paralanguage
nonverbal vocal cues in conversations, such as loudness of voice, silences, and rates of speech
The aspect of paralanguage that lends itself to the most cultural variation of meaning is
silence
In the United States, silences are often signals for the receiver of a message to contribute to the conversation. When silences last too long, people in the United States often become
uncomfortable
pregnant pause
the discomfort one feels when the conversation has come to a halt and there is an extended period during which neither conversational partner contributes to the conversation
Some cultures (Russian, Spanish) view silence as
agreement among the conversational partners.
Asian cultures view silence as a sign of
respect for elders
For American Indians, silences are a way of gathering one’s thoughts, so breaking the silence merely disrupts their
train of thoughts
high-context communication
all of these:
- communication in which the context conveys much of the meaning
- most of the information is either in a physical context or internalized in the person, while very little is in the coded, explicit, transmitted part of the message
low-context communication
all of these:
- language-dependent communication, in which the words carry most of the meaning and context plays a lesser role
- the mass of the information is vested in the explicit code
Although no culture is exclusively high-context communication or low-context communication, cultures fall on a
continuum between high and low context
Communication in the United States tends to be at the
low-context end of the HC-LC continuum
Many Asian countries tend to be at the
high end of the HC-LC continuum
E.T. Hall connects the Asian dependence on context to the Chinese written language. Thus, other countries whose written languages are derivations of the Chinese language are
high-context communication countries
One advantage of high-context communication is
it allows individuals to avoid confrontations and save face as a result
Direct questioning in high-context communication countries is considered a sign of immaturity because
it causes both parties to lose face
S. Elliot and associates found that people who talked less and allowed context to communicate more were seen as more attractive in
collectivistic cultures
According to Ting-Toomey, face involves the claimed sense of
self-respect or self-dignity in an interactive situation