Chapter 3 Flashcards
categorization
Psychologists define categorization as the process of simplifying the environment by creating categories (called social groups) based on observable characteristics (such as body size and face shape) that a particular set of people appear to have in common
A key point is that snap judgments can be fraught with
bias
subtype
Subtypes. Because people are members of all three basic categories simultaneously—a person is an older Asian male or a middle-aged Latina, for example—observers can create single categories, called subtypes, such as middle-aged Black woman, that incorporate all three pieces of information.
practice qs popped up on pg 102
kk
bottom up processint
Bottom-up processing is based on the observable characteristics of the people we encounter. Thus, the participants in Cohen’s (1981) study, described earlier, saw an image of a woman who had specific physical characteristics (such as gender, age, and manner of dress) which provided information for the perceivers to use to categorize her
top down- good pic illustrating both TD and BU on pg 102
However, categorization is also affected by top-down processing in which perceivers call upon prior knowledge they have stored in memory and their expectations about interactions to classify others (Kawakami et al., 2017). So, when evaluating the woman in the video, participants in Cohen’s study relied on their stereotypes about either waitresses or librarians to decide which category she belonged to.
racial phenotypic bias
the finding that the more prototypical of a category a person is, the more quickly and easily the person is categorized, is known as the racial phenotypical bias (Maddox, 2004).
minority bias in categorization
Because biracial individuals often have ambiguous physical characteristics, they cannot be easily categorized. In these situations, perceivers often exhibit a minority bias in categorization; that is, they tend to classify the person as a member of the minority or socially subordinate group (or, more generally, as non-White) rather than as a member of the majority group
minimal group paradigm
So, as we have noted, participants were alone, and the groups were created based on an unimportant variable rather than on an existing social group about which people had beliefs and feelings. In fact, placement into the “overestimator” or “underestimator” group was random and so was not based on the participants’ actual responses; therefore, any differences in how the groups were perceived could not have been due to real group differences. This procedure is known as the minimal group paradigm because it shows that ingroups and outgroups can be created from the most minimal conditions.
cross-racial identification bias
In general, people of other races and ethnic groups “all look alike” to most perceivers, a phenomenon known as the cross-racial identification bias
ingroup overexclusion.
Some people want to avoid treating outgroup members as though they were part of the ingroup; to accomplish this, they draw a tight circle around their ingroup, a bias called ingroup overexclusion. For these individuals, it is “safer” to misclassify people who are actually ingroup members as outgroup members (even though it means excluding some ingroup members) than to misclassify outgroup members as part of the ingroup—and thus extend ingroup privileges to the “wrong” people
practice qs pg 114
kk
For example, Javier Rodríguez-Ferreiro and Itxaso Barberia (2017) studied impressions of people from two districts in Barcelona. Citizens from the majority district and the minority district were described as having the same percentage of desirable or undesirable behaviors (see Table 3.1), but the majority group engaged in a higher number of desirable behaviors and fewer undesirable behaviors. Participants saw
an illusory correlation between place of residence and behavior—that is, they formed a positive impression of people from the majority district and a negative impression of people from the minority district.
man first principle
As Anne Maass and colleagues (2014) note, there is a man-first principle that is reflected by the tendency for men to be mentioned before women when two-word phrases, such as brothers and sisters or king and queen, are employed.
One problem is that, regardless of how researchers assess accuracy, determining the cutoff point for when
stereotypes are deemed accurate or inaccurate is difficult