chapter 2 Flashcards
are there traits outside of the big 5 and what three will we be looking at
yes there are lots of them
religiosity, intelligence and sexuality
is intelligence a personality trait
no, overall intelligence is separate from personality
explain intelligence overlapping with big 5
traditionally intelligence is considered a cognitive ability
-it does overlap with openness to some extent, but intellect in openness has more to do with education and culture (experiencing and learning more)
it also overlaps slightly with conscientiousness
-but in conscientiousness it refers to hardworking organized, motivated, etc. but some people mistakingly define intelligence as this
there is actually a small negative correlation with intelligence and conscientiousness
is religiosity a personality trait
evidence this is a trait separate from the big 5
explain religiosity
no mention in big 5 but many consider it a part of personality
spiritual transcendence is a personal search for greater connection
- this may be important part of personality
- found it relates to quality of life and social connection
is sexuality a personality trait
found 80% overlap between sexy 7 and big 5 (openness did best job of explaining sexuality)
explain sexuality
people known as sex symbols, sexuality is a part of personality
- big 5 purposefully left out traits related to sexuality (done lexically)
- the sexy seven traits were made to describe sexuality ( sexual attractiveness, loyalty, gender orientation, etc)
are the five factors comprehensive across cultures (and give examples)
no, unique indigenous personality traits
filial piety in China (taking responsibility for all of family including ancestors)
Amae in Japan (relationships between people of different power)
Philotimo in Greece (encompasses being polite, generous, respectful and funny)
explain culture and the big five (world tests)
personality profiles of culture project examined the big 5’s ability to hold up in different cultures
- the FFM (after translation) has been validated in over 50 countries (factor analysis still found evidence)
- big 5 replicates well, but openness varies the most
- culture may play large role in what openness means
- maybe openness is shaped by culture
how was criterion validity when the big 5 was given across cultures
was also strong (expected relationships between big 5 and external criteria)
ex. extraversion high score -> having lots of friendships
what are aesthetic chills (frisson) and research about them
maybe a universal indicator of openness?
-goosebumps people get in response to emotional stimuli
research finds the extent to which people indicate aesthetic chills matches their level of openness
explain the aesthetic chills study
looked at getting aesthetic chills from music
-looked at aesthetic chills as an individual differences variable (some people experience them more than others, does not mean that everyone has them)
goal: test relationship between openness and experience of aesthetic chills in response to music
method: assess Big 5 and listen to music (5 songs), measured in two ways
1) physiologically (measured galvonic skin response-sweat gland activity)
2) self-report of chills
design: correlational
results: compared to openness and individual facets of openness
- aesthetic cills correlated with openness and the individual facets (except openness of action because of a low Chronbach’s alpha)
can say if you have aesthetic chills you might be more open
explain Tsimane culture and how it pertains to big 5
some cultures may need more or less than 5 factors to explain personality (indigenous traits)
-in Tsimane culture 90% of food comes from farming and foraging, large families, low literacy rates
explain the goal and method of the Tsimane study
goal: explore reliability and validity of big 5 among Tsimane
method: big 5 inventory translated and administered to 632 Tismane adults from 28 villages (spanish)
- 430 adults rated spouses on Big 5
explain results of the Tsimane study
- when looking at Cronbach’s alpha, none over .7 for big 5 traits (conscientiousness was closest)
- when they removed certain items that might not have translated well, there was no clear improvement
- spouse report alphas get worse
scree plot
-the five factors did not hold up, self report indicated one factor, spouse report indicated 2
Eigen values
-5 factors did not hold up, had 11 factors over 1.0