Chapter 11 – Evaluating performance Flashcards
Poorly done performance evaluations can actually do more harm than ……….
No performance evaluation at all
Immediate and ongoing ……….throughout the year is essential to keep your employees on track in achieving goals and meeting expectations
Feedback
Affective performance evaluation is built around continuous and ongoing feedback. There should be ……… during a formal evaluation interview
No surprises
The evaluation serves as a ……..purpose and is not a punitive or discipline process
Developmental
During performance evaluations you should always focus on ………. not on personality or personal shortcomings and failures.
Performance results
Employees should be praised for all jobs completed satisfactory and ……..
On schedule
In cases where goals were not met, you should help your employees determine what problems occurred and ……..
How they can be overcome
How often should you develop and discuss with all team members their goals for the next work and review period?
Employees should contribute as much as possible to setting their goals at this stage.
6 to 12 months
You should have at least ……..formal evaluation interview each year with each member of your team.
1
During the interview you should encourage ………. dialogue. Listen to the comments and respond appropriately.
2-way
Always document factual information about employee progress and place this in the……..
Employees personal file
Your goal is to do whatever will help your employees including performance. Constant …….. including a written notice of a job well done, will help employees improve their job performance and reinforce the message that they are valued team members.
Feedback
An evaluation error that happens when the supervisor reads everyone at the midpoint of the scale, regardless of their performance.
Central tendency effect
An evaluation error that occurs when the supervisor rates an employee on the basis of a recent event (either positive or negative) and disregards the remainder of the evaluation period.
The recency factor
An evaluation error that happens when the supervisor lets especially positive or negative performance in one area influence the ratings for other areas.
The halo or horn effect