Chap. 6 Flashcards
1
Q
school size
A
- large schools have a more varied curriculum and diverse extracurricular activites
- student achievement is higher in more intimate schools
- smaller schools encourage encourage participation, this develope more skills and abilities
- smaller school students are more likely to hold leadership positions, do things that make them feel confident and diligent
- more inequalities of education exists in larger schools
2
Q
schools within schools
A
- subdivisions of the student body within large schools created to foster feelings of belongingness
3
Q
variations in class size
A
- research findings have been misinterpreted by politicians who began emphasizing importance of small classes
- there are similar academic outcomes in classes of 25 - 35 students
- tutoring and highly individualized instruction is exception
4
Q
age grouping and school transitions
early - mid 20th century canada
A
- 8 yrs of primary school, followed by 4 yrs of high school education
5
Q
age grouping and school transitions
1920s
A
- propsoed jr high school
- grade 7,8,9
6
Q
age grouping and school transitions
2nd half of 20th century
A
- 6 yr elementary
- 6 yrs jr high
- 3 yrs hs
7
Q
age grouping and school transitions
more common now
A
- elementary school (k-7)
- middle (6-8)
- high (9-12)
- all school transitions come with some stress
- some propose an 8-4 system to reduce the # of transitions (which would require larger school sizes)
8
Q
transition to middle or jr high school
A
- small frog in a large pond
- coincides with puberty
- teachers typically shift to focusing more on content, less on guidance and support
- interest in school decreases
- school related anxiety increases
9
Q
transition to hs
A
- more bureaucratic and intimidating
- less chance to get to know teachers
- students can have a weaker sense of belonging
- view school enviroment more -‘ve
10
Q
2ndary v. elementary schools
A
- middle teachers are: less likely to trust their students and feel confident about teaching abilities, but more likely to emphasize discipline and believe that students’ abilities are fixed
- developmental mismatch between what ados need and what they get from teachers
- bureaucratic organization and anonymity of jr high schools may have -‘ve effect on teachers
- cultural stereotypes may have -‘ve influence on teachers
11
Q
individual difference in the extent of transitional problems
A
- not all students experience the same degree of stress related to school transitions
- students who have more academic and psychosocial problems before making a school transition have more problems coping with it
- inner city ados have few economic resources may be particularly at risk for the -‘ve effects of school transitions
- boys, ethnic minority students, and students from low SES families are more likely to become disengaged from school
- parental support and involvement are associated with better adjustment during school transitions
12
Q
tracking
A
- practice of seperating students into ability groups
- they take classes with peers at the same skill level
- schools who do this can be either more exclusive/inclusive/meritocratic
13
Q
pros and cons of tracking
A
- allows teachers to design class lessons that are more finely tuned to students’ abilites
- account for mastery of certain basic skills
- remedial track students generally receive poorer quality education, not just different education
- socialized only with peers from the same track
- may discriminate against poor and ethnic minorities
14
Q
“on the wrong track”
A
- early track placements results in a difficult-to-change educational trajectory
- tracking in one class may lead to tracking in others due to scheduling
- more advanced tracking has more challenging instruction, better teaching, critical thinking classroom activities
- net effect is an increase in preexisting academic differences
- some expections exist, with lower tracks taught by exceptional teachers
15
Q
the effects of tracking on student achievement
A
- studies of the effect of tracking have produced a complicated answer with variety of shown effects
- both implementation and “detracking” are controversial
- teachers may sort based on ability without formal tracking (this results in raised expectations and evaluations for high-ability students and lowered expectations and evaluations for low-ability students)
16
Q
performance orientation
A
- lower esteem
- lower care for the school system
- single out high achievers
- students focus on competition for grades
- outcomes seen as signs of ability