Ch.5 Online Quiz

Question 1

Jake and Mary are married and own their home. The police come to the house and ask for permission to search the house for drugs. Jake is this consent to the surgeon, but Mary says no because she has been some drugs in the kitchen. Please come in and search, over Mary’s objection, since Jake said it was OK. If I marry drugs. What is legally correct in the ensuing trial?

Answer 1

The drugs cannot be used at Mary’s trial because she did not consent to search

Question 2

What Supreme Court case has become the basis for stop and frisk?

Answer 2

Terry versus Ohio

Question 3

What is not a justification for emergency warrantless searches?

Answer 3

Danger to property

Question 4

What 1936 Supreme Court case address physical abuse as a means of attending the confession?

Answer 4

Brown versus Mississippi

Question 5

Which Supreme Court ruling apply the principles developed in Weeks versus US to trials and state courts?

Answer 5

Mapp versus Ohio

Question 6

And what tasted the US Supreme Court stated that considerations of Public Safety can be overriding and make it a need for rights advertisement prior to limited questioning?

Answer 6

New York versus Quarels

Question 7

Silverthorne lumber company versus US is responsible for describing what principle of Fourth Amendment Processes?

Answer 7

Fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine

Question 8

Which US Supreme Court case with responsible for the creation of the exclusionary rule?

Answer 8

Weeks versus US

Question 9

Unreasonable searches and seizures are prohibited by the what?

Answer 9

Fourth amendment

Question 10

A writ of certiorari….

Answer 10

Allows appellate courts to review the record of a lower court case

Question 11

Which game is 1966 US Supreme Court is provided for the advertisement of rights to criminal suspects prior to questioning?

Answer 11

Miranda versus Arizona

Question 12

Supreme Court made the exclusionary rule applicable to criminal prosecutions at the state level?

Answer 12

Warren court

Question 13

What is not an area of communication the ECPA deal specifically with?

Answer 13

GPS tracking

Question 14

And officers authority to detain occupants of the dwelling incident to the execution of a valid search warrant is…

Answer 14

Absolute and unqualified

Question 15

Which amendment guarantees against self incrimination?

Answer 15

Fifth

Question 16

What cases produce substantial changes both in the understanding of the requirements of the process and in the practical day-to-day operations of the justice system?

Answer 16

Landmark

Question 17

What do you have Supreme Court made the exclusionary rule applicable to seizures by federal officers?

Answer 17

Weeks versus US

Question 18

Legal principle that excludes from introduction at trial any evidence later developed as a result of an illegal search or seizure is called….

Answer 18

Fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine

Question 19

What holds that evidence of an offense that is collected or obtained by law-enforcement officers in violation of the defendants constitutional rights is in admissible for use in a criminal prosecution in a court of law?

Answer 19

Exclusionary rule

Question 20

What warrant is issued based on probable cause to believe that evidence of a crime, while not currently at the place described, will likely be there when the warrant is executed?

Answer 20

Anticipatory

Question 21

Do US Supreme Court decided in Illinois versus Perkins that…

Answer 21

Inmates freely talking about their crimes to an undercover officer posing as an innate are not protected by Maranda

Question 22

The 1984 US Supreme Court case US versus Leon established what?

Answer 22

The good faith exception

Question 23

What is not one of the major areas of due process requirements of relevance to the police?

Answer 23

Incarceration

Question 24

During which Supreme Court justices tenured to the rights of individuals expand dramatically?

Answer 24

Earl Warren

Question 25

What requires that incriminating evidence be seized by police according to the constitutional specifications of due process or it will not be allowed as evidence in court?

Answer 25

Exclusionary rule