CH3 - Stakeholders and Issues Flashcards
Pluralist society
influence or power is decentralized by dispersing it among a variety of institutions
-> not one institution is completely independent of others
-> Each institution has some autonomy to pursue own interests
Stakeholder
dindividual, or group, who can influence and/or is influenced by the achievement of an organization’s purpose
-> reason for managers to identify them : obtain resources, maintain legitimacy of business
Freeman (1984) quote and meaning
“If you want to manage effectively, then you must take your stakeholders into account in a systematic fashion.”
-> managers must seek out stakeholders
Relationship between corp. and stakeholders
Relationship is two-way:
-> corps. must understand how activities influence stakeholders
-> stakeholders must consider their responsibilities to the corporation
Examples of Stakeholders
Owners, directors, employees, customers, lenders and creditors, suppliers, competitors, NGOs, society at large, educational inst., government, etc.
Categorizing stakeholders (according to Frederick, Davis and Post)
-> primary interactions : with employees (unions), shareholders, creditors, suppliers, customers, competitors, wholesalers or retailers
-> secondary interactions : with local communities, governments, social activist groups, media, business support groups, general public
Categorizing stakeholders (Mintzberg)
Stakeholders are either external or internal to the organization
Categorizing stakeholders (according to Phillips)
Normative stakeholders : those whom organization has an obligation and from whom corp. accepts benefits
Derivative stakeholders : those from whom corp. has no accepted benefits, but they hold power over the corp.
Responsibility of a Manager around stakeholders
-> identity them
-> understand how corp. views them
-> examine how each one can/will influence corp.
-> assess opportunities, threats and magnitude
-> rank them by influence
-> prepare programs/policies how to cope with them
CEO as manager, special stakeholder compensation
-> High CEO compensation raises ethical implications
-> Changing executive compensation :
- contributes to income inequity
4 arguments against the stakeholder concept
1 - problem of categorization: how to identify and prioritize
2 - challenges in meeting expectations: no clear statement of s.h. expectations and complex trade-offs
3 - dilution of top management focus: s.h. divert management attention away from measurable results
4 - impracticality of shared governance: impractical to have competing and conflicting interests govern corporation
4 arguments for the stakeholder concept
1 - responding to s.h. = good business
2 - ignoring stakeholder interests can have substantial economic consequences
3 - identifies the full range of individuals and groups from whom loyalty is needed
4 - provides a systematic approach to recognizing stakeholder expectations and deciding whether to respond
Issue meaning
point in question where different views are held of what is or what ought to the corporate performance-based management or s.h. expectations.
Issues Relating to
Ethics, Responsibilities,
and Sustainability
1- controversial inconsistency based on expectation gaps
2- Involving management perceptions of changing legitimacy
3- Occur with or between views of what is and/or what ought to be corporate performance
4- Imply and actual or anticipated resolution that creates significant impact on organization
Issues Management def
systemic process by which the corp. can identity, evaluate and respond to economic, social, and environmental issues that may impact significantly upon it