Ch 3: Laws and Rights Flashcards
Miranda warning
Right stated after arrest to remain silent and refuse to answer questions and if you give up that right, anything said can be used against you in court
Civil law
Concerned with noncriminal matters regarding ppl, things, and relationships
Criminal law
Concerned with crimes and punishment of ppl who commit crime
International crime
Crime that’s a matter of grave concern to other countries even if it only involves one country (ex: war crime)
Transnational crime
Crime that’s planned or executed across more than one country
Substantive law
What constitutes a crime and what the punishment is
Procedural law
Laws regarding how laws/crimes will be enforced (courts)
Seven Principles of Criminal Law
Legality, actus rea, causation, harm, concurrence, mens rea, punishment
Legality
There must be a law that defines the action as a crime
Actus rea
Act has been committed
Causation
The act caused the harm (there has to be a correlation between the cause and harm)
Harm
The act caused harm to a protected value
Concurrence
The intent and the act must be presented at the same time/within time frame
Mens rea
Act is only a crime when it’s during a guilty state of mind
Punishment
Must be stated in the law that calls for punishment for that offense
Criminal defense (eight cases when crimes let off)
Self-defense, necessity, duress, entrapment, mistake of act, infancy, intoxication, insanity
Self-defense
Act may ward off the attack when belief that there’s immediate danger relieves culpability
Necessity
Breaking of law to save themself or prevent greater harm relieves culpability
Duress
Forced, coerced, threatened, psychological pressure, etc were used to get one to act against their wishes
Entrapment
Law enforcement inspired, incited, persuaded, or lured one into crime
Mistake of act
Unintentional violation based on a crucial mistake relieves culpability (fuzzy since ignorance isn’t excused)
Infancy (immaturity)
Children under age of 7 (unless the intent is there) are relieved of culpability
Intoxication
Inebriation relieves culpability if it lacked intent
Insanity
Mental illness relieves culpability
M’Naghten Rule
Defense for criminal insanity that defendant didn’t know what they were doing or that it was wrong
Irresistible Impulse Test
Defense for criminal insanity that criminal couldn’t control their behavior
Durham Rule
Defense for criminal insanity that criminal act was caused by mental illness
Model Penal Code’s Substantial Capacity Test
Defense for criminal insanity that criminal lacks substantial capacity to appreciate the wrongfulness of their conduct or to control it
Comprehensive Crime Control Act
Defense for criminal insanity that criminal lacks capacity to appreciate the wrongfulness of their conduct