CH 1 Psychology of Scientific Thinking (Questions) Flashcards
Psychology and Scientific Thinking
What are the Levels of Analysis in Psychology?
- Higher Levels : Social culture influences; involves relating to others and personal relationships; “the mind” (brain in action).
- Middle Levels: Psychological influences (mental or neurological); Involves thoughts, feelings, and emotions.
- Lower Levels: Biological influences (molecular or neurochemical); Involves the molecules and brain structure; “the brain.”
What complexities exist within Psychology?
- Behaviour is difficult to predict
- Behaviour is multiply determined:produce by many factors
- Psychological variables are often interrelated:
- Individual Differences: Thinking, emotion, personal beliefs, behaviours…
- Mutual Influences: Reciprocal Determinism (People mutually influence each other’s behaviour)
- Culture and Cultural Differences
What is wrong with common sense?
While Common sense can be correct, the bases on which it’s developed isn’t entirely factual/scientific.
- It’s usage can be problematic in ambiguous or complex situations (ex. politics).
- Naive Realism
Why do people refuse to regard Psychology as a science?
- Psychology is quite intuitive
- People lack scientific literation and are unable to understand the nuances behind scientific thinking
What is a Scientific Theory?
- Explains why things are the way they are in the natural world
- Generates hypotheses: a testable prediction derived from a scientific theory.
What are 3 misconceptions about theories?
- A theory explains one specific event
- A theory is an educated guess
- Theories account for findings; provide an explanatory framework. They are more like educated conclusions, rather than “guesses.”
- A theory can be proven correct
- A theory can only be falsified and supported by evidence, it cannot be proven correct.
Despite dealing with factual information, how can science by wrong?
- Scientific Knowledge is tentative and acquired slowly
- Many results fail to be replicated
What are 5 warning signs of Pseudoscience?
- Exaggerated Claims
- Over reliance on anecdotes (a personal story used to support a claim)
- Overuse of ad hoc immunizing hypothesis (A way to explain away disconfirming evidence, immunizing evidence/claims that goes against a theory)
- Lack of Self-Correction: No method for getting rid of unsupported claims; Science is fundamentally built for self-correction
- Talk of “proof” instead of evidence
Why are we drawn to pseudoscience?
We search for order in a complex world.
We find comfort in our beliefs
- Personal Benefits: believing what we want to be true
- Gives us a sense of control
What are the 3 fallacies in Pseudoscience?
- Emotional Reasoning Fallacy: Use emotions as guides to evaluate a claim
- Bandwagon Fallacy: Accept a claim because many people believe it
- Not me Fallacy: Belief that we are immune from errors in thinking that afflict other people
What is the only antidote against Pseudoscience?
To think clearly and objectively.
What are the 3 dangers of Pseudoscience?
- Opportunity Cost
- ex. People don’t seek scientifically supported treatments for mental health problems
- Direct Harm: Pseudoscientific treatments can inflict problems or worsen existing ones
- Propagates an inability to think scientifically as citizens (failure to think critically)