Carpal Injuries and Carpal Arthrodesis Flashcards
Nakladal, VCOT, 2013:
- What was the most common cause of carpal joint injuries in cats?
- Which carpal joint was predominantly injured in cats and what was the most common cause of the injury?
- Which carpal joint is most frequently injured in falls from heights up to the 3rd floor?
- What is the most common type of carpal joint injury in cats?
Nakladal, VCOT, 2013:
- 73% of carpal joint injuries in cats were caused by a fall from a height
- The antebrachiocarpal joint was predominantly injured (51% of cases) and was most commonly caused by falls from the 4th floor or higher
- Falls from heights up to the 3rd floor predominantly injured the carpometacarpal joint in cats
- The most common type of carpal joint injury in cats was luxation or subluxation (compared to hyperextension in dogs)
Tomlinson and Manfredi, JAVMA, 2014:
Effect(s) of carpal brace applications for unilateral carpal ligament instability?
Tomlinson and Manfredi, JAVMA, 2014:
Improved stability and resolution or reduction in lameness were observed following carpal brace application for 12 weeks
Castelli, Vet Surg, 2019:
- Which provided better visualization of carpal ligaments - MRI or MRA?
- Which provided better visualization - MRI and MRA or CT and CTA?
- Did contrast arthrography improve the capabilities of MRI or CT for the visualization of canine carpal ligament?
Castelli, Vet Surg, 2019:
- MRA provided better visualization of carpal ligaments and offered the best visualization overall
- MRI and MRA offered better visualization compared to CT and CTA
- Contrast orthography improved the capabilities of MRI but not CT
Milgram, VCOT, 2019:
- What effect did increasing the angle of flexion of the carpus have?
- What plays a more important role in craniocaudal antebrachiocarpal joint stability - antebrachiocarpal joint position or the palmar radoiocarpal and ulnocarpal ligaments?
Milgram, VCOT, 2019:
- Increasing the angle of flexion of the carpus resulted in increased cranial and caudal translation of the manus relative to the radius and ulna
- Antebrachiocarpal joint position plays a more important role in craniocaudal joint stability
Burton, VCOT, 2013:
Partial carpal arthrodesis - castless partial carpal arthrodesis (par-CA) plate vs T-plate vs cross pins
- Advantages of the par-CA plate?
- Differences in biomechanics?
Burton, VCOT, 2013:
- The par-CA plate permits radial and ulnar carpal bone compression, a more distal location of the plate to limit impingement, and placement of screws in 2 metacarpal bones
- The T-plate and par-CA plate were biomechanically similar but both were superior to cross pins in resisting micromotion
Bristow, Vet Surg, 2015:
Pancarpal arthrodesis with a hybrid DCP (HDCP) vs castless arthrodesis plate (CLP)
- Intra-op complication rates of HDCP vs CLP?
- Most common intra-op complication for CLP?
- Post-op complication rates of HDCP vs CLP?
- Most common post-op complication for HDCP vs CLP?
- Radiographic healing rates at 30-40 weeks post-op for HDCP vs CLP?
- What % of HDCP vs CLP had no or mild lameness at median follow-up?
Bristow, Vet Surg, 2015:
- Intra-op complication rate: 11% for HDCP vs 21% for CLP
- Most common intra-op complication for CLP was metacarpal fracture/fissure
- Post-op complication rate: 34% for HDCP vs 41% for CLP
- Most common post-op complication: SSI (18% of cases)
- Radiographic healing rates at 30-40 weeks post-op: 40% for HDCP vs 46% for CLP
- 73% of HDCP cases and 83% of CLP cases had no or mild lameness at median follow-up
Brown, Vet Surg, 2016:
Pancarpal arthrodesis for highly comminuted articular fractures of the distal antebrachium
- Outcomes?
- Risk of complications?
- Prognosis for full functional outcome?
Brown, Vet Surg, 2016:
- 38% full functional outcome, 38% acceptable outcome
- High risk of complications
- Guarded prognosis
Ramirez and Macias, Vet Surg, 2016:
Pancarpal arthrodesis without rigid coaptation using the hybrid DCP
- Minor complication rate?
- Major complication rate?
- Outcomes?
Ramirez and Macias, Vet Surg, 2016:
- 23% minor complication rate
- 17% major complication rate
- 87% excellent outcome, 13% good outcome