Book 6, Case 4-Non OB surgery in an OB pt Flashcards
Concerns for surgery in an OB pt?
The mother is exposed to increased risk of failed intubation,
pulmonary aspiration, hemorrhage, infection, and thromboembolism. The baby is also
exposed to increased risk, including preterm labor/delivery (especially with abdominal
surgery), teratogenesis (although the highest risk is during organogenesis, which occurs
around the 15th _5oth day post-conception), fetal asphyxia, intrauterine growth restriction,
miscarriage, and neurotoxicity (exposure of the developing brain to general anesthesia may
lead to neurodegeneration, with subsequent long-term neurocognitive deficits). Undergoing
laparoscopic surgery carries specific risks for the obstetric patient, such as damage to the
gravid uterus (this risk is reduced by employing alternative sites for the Varess needle and
trocars), increased risk of miscarriage or preterm labor (because abdominal surgery), and
hypercapnia-induced fetal acidosis (risk reduced by adjusting mechanical ventilation to
maintain normocapnia or by employing gasless laparoscopy).
When is the best time to perform semi-elective surgery on a pregnant patient?
Given the increased risk of miscarriage and teratogenesis in the first trimester,
and the increased risk of preterm labor/delivery in the third trimester, the optimal time for
semi-elective surgery during pregnancy is the second trimester.Furthermore, it is preferable
to operate before the 23rd week of pregnancy in order to further minimize the risk of preterm
labor and allow for adequate surgical access within the abdomen.
Which anesthetic agents are teratogenic?
While almost any agent can prove teratogenic if the dose is large enough and
given at the right time, human studies have not conclusively shown that any anesthetic agent
results in increased congenital abnormalities. The conclusions of past studies that suggested
possible teratogenic effects associated with nitrous oxide and benzodiazepines have been
questioned, and are not supported by more recent studies and epidemiologic data.
Baby is 22 weeks: Would you administer prophylactic glucocorticoids prior to surgery?
I would not administer prophylactic glucocorticoids for the purpose of fetal
lung maturation, since this baby has not yet reached the age of viability (23-24 weeks).
Current recommendations are to administer a single course of corticosteroids when there is a
significant risk of preterm delivery between 24 and 34 weeks gestation. Prophylactic
administration at this gestational age has been demonstrated to significantly reduce theincidence of respiratory distress syndrome, intraventricuiar hemorrhage, and neonatal death
in infants delivered prior to 30 weeks gestation.
I would, however, consider administering dexamethasone to help with the mother’s nausea,
keeping in mind that the administration of a glucocorticoid to a diabetic patient may further
complicate glucose control.
Would you administer a prophylactic tocolytic?
I would not administer prophylactic tocolytics because, although surgery
places the pregnant patient at increased risk of preterm delivery (the risk is even higher with
abdominal surgery, as in this case), there is no evidence to support the routine use of
prophylactic tocolytic agents.Unfortunately, monitoring of uterine contractions and early tocolytic therapy has not been
proven to reduce the incidence of preterm delivery.
Is aspiration prophylaxis necessary at this gestational age? 22 weeks gestation
most practitioners recommend aspiration
prophylaxis after 18-20 weeks gestation. This patient not only falls within this range, but is
at increased risk due to the emergent nature of the procedure, an increased risk of difficult
intubation (due to the physiologic changes of pregnancy and/or diabetic stiff joint syndrome),
potential gastroparesis (acute abdomen and/or diabetic autonomic neuropathy), concurrent
nausea and vomiting, and the fact that she is undergoing laparoscopic surgery. Therefore, I
would take steps to minimize the risk of pulmonary aspiration, such as administering
metoclopramide, an H2-receptor antagonist, and/or a nonparticulate antacid; performing a
rapid sequence induction with cricoid pressure and the patient in reverse trendelenburg
(improves respiratory mechanics, facilitates rapid intubation, and inhibits passive
regurgitation); emptying the stomach with a nasogastric or orogastric tube; and delaying
extubation until the patient is fully awake.
What is diabetic stiff joint syndrome?
Diabetic stiff joint syndrome (a.k.a. diabetic scleroderma), which is due to
glycosylation of proteins and abnormal collagen cross-linking, may develop in patients with
long-standing type I diabetes mellitus. The syndrome can result in limited movement of the
atlanto-occipital, temporomandibular, and cervical spine joints, potentially increasing the
difficulty of direct laryngoscopy and intubation. I would use the “prayer sign” to screen for
this syndrome. If the patient is unable to completely approximate the palmar surfaces of the
phalangeal joints of the hands (prayer sign), this is suggestive of stiff joint syndrome, which
raises concerns of difficult airway management.
Her blood sugar comes back at 356 mg/di. What would you do?
Given this patient’s clinical picture, including potential infection, high blood
sugar, abdominal pain, and nausea and vomiting, I would be very concerned that this type I
diabetic has developed diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) secondary to, or independent of,
appendicitis (abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting are all symptoms ofDKA as well as
appendicitis).
Therefore, I would notify the surgeon; administer an intravenous bolus of 10
U of insulin; begin fluid replacement with normal saline; check for serum and urinary
ketones; obtain an arterial blood gas, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, and electrolytes; and
determine the anion gap (DKA results in an increased anion gap acidosis).
If it were determined that the patient was in DKA, I would continue fluid replacement; start
an insulin infusion with the goal ofreducing plasma glucose by 75-100 mg/dL per hour
(more rapid reductions risk cerebral edema); add 5% dextrose to the insulin infusion when
the serum glucose reaches 250 mg/dL (to prevent hypoglycemia and to provide a continuous
energy source); replace potassium, phosphate, and magnesium as necessary; and continue to
closely monitor serum potassium, blood glucose, serum ketones, and the anion gap.
Anion gaps can be different at different institutions, so…
Therefore, you should always consult your specific laboratory’s
normal reference range when making clinical decisions.
DKA Tx:
Treat with fluids (NS + K @ 10 cc/kg/hr) and insulin (10 U IV push then 0.1 U/kg/hr) followed by dextrose when BG < 250. Mortality rate 5-10%.
HHS: same precipitating events as DKA with the addition of renal failure and/or dehydration. Caused by severe osmotic diuresis and subsequent dehydration/prerenal failure. These patients are not ketoacidotic because they produce insulin and have enough sensitivity to avert mobilization of fatty acids/ketogenesis. Glucose ~ 1000. Treat similarly to DKA (fluids and insulin). Electrolyte abnormalities less severe than in DKA, volume deficits and osmolarity are worse. Mortality 10-15%.
You determine that she is in DKA. Would you delay this emergent case?
The decision to delay this case for treatment is a risk/benefit decision that
must be made in consultation with the surgeon. In that discussion, I would point out that
even a short delay to partially resolve metabolic acidosis, hypovolemia, and hypokalemia
may reduce the risk of intraoperative cardiac arrhythmias and hypotension. However, the
decision would have to be made recognizing that delaying the case risks worsening
appendicitis, peritonitis (if not already present), and further metabolic deterioration.
Monitors for this DKA pt:
What about SCDs-and why?
(1) an arterial line for frequent blood draws
(e.g. electrolytes, blood sugar), arterial blood gas analysis, and blood pressure management
(DKA, 24 hours of nausea and vomiting, and possible diabetic autonomic neuropathy place
her at risk for hemodynamic instability); (2) a Foley catheter to follow urine output and
decompress the bladder (to improve the surgeon’s view and reduce the risk of perforation
during laparoscopy); (3) transvaginal Doppler ultrasonography for continuous intraoperative
fetal heart rate monitoring (allows for optimization of maternal hemodynamics when the
FHR suggests fetal stress); and
In addition to these monitors, I would place an orogastric or nasogastric tube to empty and
decompress the stomach (reduces the risk of pulmonary aspiration and surgical perforation
during laparoscopy) and pneumatic compression devices on the lower limbs to reduce the
risk of embolism (pregnant patients are hypercoagulable, and creation of the
pneumoperitoneum promotes intraoperative venous stasis).
Is there any reason for continuous intraoperative fetal heart rate monitoring if the baby
is not viable? And what will you do if FHR suggests distress?
Yes. Even though an emergent cesarean section is not an option for a
nonviable baby ( <23 weeks), intraoperative monitoring allows for optimization of maternal
hemodynamics when the FHR suggests fetal stress. While intraoperative monitoring is not
always warranted, this patient’s medical condition places her at increased risk for
hemodynamic instability. Should an unexplained change in FHR occur intraoperatively, I
would quickly ensure adequate left uterine displacement, blood pressure, oxygenation, and
volume replacement. I would then verify sinus rhythm; attempt to identify excessive
bleeding or surgical impairment of uterine perfusion; check electrolytes, hemoglobin, and an
ABG; and consider reducing the pneumoperitoneum (intra-abdominal pressures should
optimally be maintained between 8-12 mmHg).
The patient is intubated and the surgery proceeds. During creation of the
pneumoperitoneum, her heart rate decreases to 46 bpm and her blood pressure begins
to fall. What will you do?
Since the timing of this event suggests a reflex increase in vagal tone with
creation of the pneumoperitoneum, I would: ( 1) ask the surgeon to discontinue insufflation;
(2) evaluate the ECG (the increased vagal tone can lead to cardiac arrhythmias), (3) check
her blood pressure; (4) administer atropine (while glycopyrrolate is less likely to cross the
placenta, the onset of action is too slow for acute treatment); (5) ensure adequate
oxygenation, ventilation, and left uterine displacement; and ( 6) provide fluids and
vasopressors as indicated. However, recognizing that there are other potential causes of
these hemodynamic changes (i.e. tension pneumothorax, metabolic and/or electrolyte
disturbances, and significant C02 embolism), I would also: (7) verify proper endotracheal
tube placement; (8) auscultate the chest; and (9) check the patient’s blood sugar, electrolytes,
and arterial blood gasses. Following hemodynamic stabilization, I would ensure adequate
intra vascular volume and depth of anesthesia prior to allowing re-insufflation of the abdomen
(preferably at a lower insufflation pressure).
Assume you placed a transvaginal Doppler to monitor fetal heart tones. Now, you
check the fetal heart rate tracing and note the absence of variability. What do you
think?
Fetal heart rate variability is important because it serves as a good indicator of
fetal well-being. However, the lack of variability is expected in this case, because fetal heart
rate variability does not develop until the 25th to 2ih week of gestation. If the baby’s
gestational age were more advanced and fetal heart rate variability was present
preoperatively, it would be necessary to distinguish the reduction in variability that occurs
with the administration of atropine (since I used this in the treatment of the mother’s
bradycardia) or induction of general anesthesia (especially when opioids are used) from that
resulting secondary to fetal hypoxia. ill either case, the presence of severe and persistent
bradycardia, tachycardia, or repetitive decelerations on the FHR tracing should prompt
optimization of the mother’s hemodynamics and uteroplacental oxygen delivery (i.e. LUD,
100% oxygen, volume resuscitation, and blood pressure support).