Biological Psychology -- Issues and Debates Flashcards
Ethics – Brengden et al.
issues of consent – children are unable to give consent due to their young age
instead its often parents or guardians who give consent (children don’t get a say)
teacher and peer ratings –
also has ethical issues, this could influence the confidence/ esteem of these children as they may be influenced by these comments
Ethics – tests on animals
testing on animals basically implies that humans are superior to animals
animals can’t give consent
these studies can be distressing to animals
findings may not be generalisable to humans
implementation of research into recreational drugs to society
clearer understanding of how recreational drugs affect CNS functioning may lead to better treatments for addiction
can help discover more effective methods to prevent addiction
practical issues – correlation research
(e.g. positive correlation between levels of testosterone and aggression)
this is just a correlation, doesn’t actually show any cause and effect between the two factors
practical issues – brengden et al.
MZ and DZ twins were only compared through how identical they looked
an issue – DZ twins can still look similar, they should’ve used DNA to test what kind of twins they are
practical issues – evolution theory
it is difficult to test, trace, compare, etc. you can’t really have a study to compare those before and after evolution
reductionism – narrow focus of biological factors on aggression
- amygdala dysfunction isn’t an inevitable cause of aggression
- there are many other factors which can cause aggression through interacting (social, psychological, environment)
- interact with genetic predisposition
- doesn’t reflect the true complexity of the factors of aggression
reductionism – role of hormones in human behaviour
- explaining human behaviour by using basic biological units (e.g. hormones)
reductionism – Raine et al.
- used brain scanning technology to identify brain impairments in those charged with murder (NGRI)
- only looked at the brain
- neglected social factors
Freud’s theory and biological explanations in explaining behaviour
- shares the view that aggression is instinctive and therefore innate
- Freud – unconscious impulse originating in the id causes aggression
- bio – linked to biological structures and functions and hormones
- two different approaches share similar assumptions in explaining behaviour
‘psychology is a science’
use of fossils as evidence:
- Ladevèze et al.
- used fossils to explain behaviour
- found males are bigger than females
- showed male-male competition
- objective scientific approach
biological approach:
- generally more scientific
- most have more standardised procedures, biological/scientific links, fasifiable hypothesis, etc.
‘psychology is not a science’
Freud’s explanation of aggression
- based on psychodynamics
- explains through the id, ego and superego
- explains catharsis and aggression
- not a scientific approach
- theory based, not objective
Culture and gender – role of evolution
ignores culture
- doesn’t take into account how culture may influence evolution
- difference in aggression is not universal
- suggests that innately determined behaviour can be outweighed by cultural norms
culture and gender – hormones and evolution
- males are typically more aggressive than women
- female aggression may be different to male aggression – Eisenegger et al. gave women a dose of testosterone, they behaved more generously and sociably in a negotiating game, suggests their aggression might be more complex
- testosterone having similar effects on women – Dabbs and Hargrove. measured testosterone from 87 female inmates in a max security prison, found criminal violence positively correlated with testosterone level, similar to male criminals
nature vs. nurture – Brengden et al.
- shows that nature and nurture are powerful influences
- a criticism to this study is that it doesnt consider the interactions between genes and environment
- statistical analysis treated the two influences as independent