Bandura 61 Flashcards

1
Q

What were the aims of Bandura’s study?

A

To see if children would copy an adult’s aggressive behaviour towards a Bobo doll
- To see if children were more likely to copy the aggressive behaviours of adults of the same sex
- To see if boys were more likely to copy the aggressive behaviours than girl

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Who were used in the sample?

A

72 boys and girls with an average age of 4 years old from the same university nursery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What participant design was used?

A

Matched pairs- on natural aggression rated by teacher, matched in triplets with one for each condition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What were the 3 different conditions?

A

1) Control group
2) Aggressive model
3) Non-aggressive model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What were the 3 IVs?

A

1) Condition children were exposed to
2) Gender of the child
3) Gender of the adult

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What were the DVs?

A

1) Number of physical aggressive acts displayed including imitative and nonimitative

2) Number of verbal aggressive acts displayed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What type of study is this?

A

A structured observation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What happened in stage 1?

A

The children were exposed to either the aggressive model who attacked bobo and showed verbal aggression e.g. pow or they watched the non-aggressive model e.g. potatoe printing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What happened in stage 2?

A

The children had their aggression aroused by being in another room with nice toys and then told they couldn’t use them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What happened in stage 3?

A

They were observed in a playroom with Bobo through a two-way mirror every 5s for 20m looking at their aggressive and non-aggressive behaviours

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What were the results of Bandura’s study?

A

Seeing aggressive model increased agg
-Non-Agg model decreased agg (0.2 & 1.5 Vs 2.0)
-Boys imitated more physically aggressive acts than girls. (25.6 Vs 7.2)
-No diff in verbal agg between boys and girls. (13.7 Vs 12.7)
-Male model more influential for physical agg

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

give an evaluation of the generalisablity of the study

A

Used a sample of 72 boys and girls. This does not represent how adults would observe and reproduce behaviour of their role models due to being significantly different in context to the role models of children AND opportunity sample from the same nursery so might have shared characteristics effecting their aggression

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Evaluate the reliability using 2 high points.

A

High as standardised procedure such as observing children at 5 second intervals for 20 mins making the study accurately replicable to test for consistency of results AND High inter-rater as it included 2 observers who agreed 89% of the time which removes subjectivity and makes the results objective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is good about using a matched pairs design in Bandura?

A

Their natural aggression was accounted for meaning this didn’t impact on the aggression they showed after watching the model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Evaluate the validity using the Bobo doll in this experiment

A

Low as children may have hit Bobo as that is the purpose of the toy. Therefore no cause and effect could be established because they thought that was how you play with it rather than actually being aggressive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Evaluate the ecological validity of Bandura’s 1961 study

A

Low ecological validity. Carried out in an artificial environment where the model and the child were strangers. Doesn’t represent how children would observe and imitate behaviour in real life

17
Q

Evaluate a strength of using covert observations?

A

The children are less likely to show aggression due to demand characteristics as they don’t know the purpose of the study

18
Q

Evaluate a strength of using structured observations?

A

High levels of control e.g. the setting, toys in the room, what behaviours they saw etc which meant EVs about the model couldn’t impact their behaviour

19
Q

Evaluate an ethical issue.

A

Unethical as the children were deliberately encouraged to be aggressive with no talk of removing that aggression and so children may have been aggressive after the study