Attachments - Interactions/Stages/Role of the Father Flashcards
1
Q
What is attachment?
A
- an emotional bond between two people and this behaviour aims to maintain proximity/contact
2
Q
What are the two main types of caregiver-infant interactions?
A
- reciprocity
- interactional synchrony
3
Q
What is reciprocity?
A
- an interaction is reciprocal when each person responds to the other and elicits a response from them
- for example, when a mother smiles and the baby smiles back
4
Q
What did Brazelton (1979) argue?
A
- basic rhythm of reciprocity is an important precursor to later communications
- its regularity allows the caregiver to anticipate the infant’s behaviour/respond appropriately
- the sensitivity to infant behaviour provides a foundation for after attachment
5
Q
What is interactional synchrony?
A
- a special type of interaction between the caregiver and infant where they carry out the same action simultaneously
- it is a reflection of what the other is doing (mother and infant reflect the actions/emotions of the other)
6
Q
What was Meltzoff and Moore’s (1977) study?
A
- four different stimuli (3 facial expressions and 1 hand gesture) were used to observe the behaviour of infants
- adult model displayed this and infants had a dummy in their mouth (during initial display)
- dummy was removed and any reactions were observed/recorded
- observer watched in real time, slow mo and frame by frame
- it was then judged by independent observers who were asked to identify the model’s behaviours
- behavioural categories:
- mouth opening
- termination of mouth opening
- tongue protrusion
- termination of tongue protrusion
- ** inter-observer reliability scores were above 0.92 **
7
Q
What were the findings of Meltzoff and Moore’s study?
A
- young infants imitated specific facial gestures (association)
- in a later study, they demonstrated synchrony with young infants (innate behaviour)
- Piaget (1962) cannot imitate intentionally
- instead they pseudo-imitate because there is a reward
- supporting study:
- Murray and Trevarthen (1985) studied 2-month-old infants interacting with their mother in real time
- when the mother was not responding, the infants showed acute distress
- this shows that they are actively eliciting a response
8
Q
Why are the strengths/weaknesses of caregiver-infant interactions?
A
- problems with testing infant behaviour:
- difficult to test the reliability of their behaviour
- infants mouths are in fairly constant motion
- difficult to distinguish between general activity and specific imitated behaviours
- failure to replicate:
- Koepke et al (1985) failed to replicate the study’s findings
- problems may be due to the procedure rather than the babies
- intentional or imitative behaviour:
- Abravenal and DeYoung (1991) found that infants showed little response when shown objects with diff. expressions
- this shows that they do not just imitate what they see, it is in fact a social response
- individual differences:
- there is variation between infants behaviour
- more strongly attached infant-caregiver pairs showed greater interactional synchrony
- value of research:
- studying this is important as it shows how infant interactions forms the basis for social development
- babies associate their imitation with feeling and this leads to them understanding how others think/feel (Theory of Mind)
9
Q
What are the stages of attachment?
A
- stage one: pre-attachment (birth - 3 months)
- 0 - 6 weeks = babies behave similarly to both human and inanimate objects
- from six weeks, they become attracted to other humans
- they are also happier in the presence of humans
- stage 2: indiscriminate (3 - 6/7 months)
- babies are more social
- they recognise and prefer familiar adults
- they do not show any separation protest or stranger anxiety
- stage 3: discriminate (7/8 months)
- by 7 months, infants show separation anxiety and show joy when reunited with a specific person
- this is the primary attachment figure
- they also show stranger anxiety
- stage 4: multiple (9 months)
- after the primary attachment is formed, multiple attachments are formed
- Schaffer and Emerson found that within the first month of being attached, 30% of infants had multiple attachments to someone else
10
Q
What is Schaffer and Emerson’s (1964) study?
A
- studied 60 babies from Glasgow and were visited in their homes every four weeks
- overt observations and interviews were used/mothers kept a diary of her child’s behaviour
- left alone in a room
- left with other people
- left in their pram outside house
- left in their pram outside shops
- left in cot at night
- put down after being held by adult
- passed by while sitting in cot/chair
- mothers were asked to describe the intensity of any protest
- behaviours that were studied were: separation protest/stranger anxiety
11
Q
What were the findings of Schaffer and Emerson’s study?
A
- 65% = first specific primary attachment was the mother
- 30% = jointly attached to mother and another figure
- 3% = attached to father
- 27% = jointly attached to father/mother
- most babies formed multiple attachments as soon as the first attachment
12
Q
What are the strengths of development of attachments?
A
- good external validity:
- carried out in a natural environment
- would not have shown demand characteristics
- findings are applicable to everyday life
- longitudinal design:
- babies and their mothers were regularly followed up and observed
- so it has a greater internal validity as there are no individual differences
- no ethical issues:
- consent was obtained from parents
- confidentiality was maintained
12
Q
What are multiple attachments?
A
- Bowlby believed that attachments were hierarchal in nature with children having one primary attachment figure
- then secondary attachments to others
- rutter proposed the idea of multiple attachments were they are all of equal importance
13
Q
What are the weaknesses of development of attachments?
A
- methodological issues:
- observations/self-report measures were used and both are prone to bias
- mothers may have shown social desirability bias
- biased sample:
- only consisted of a working-class population
- parental care has changed considerably since that time (e.g. more women go to work)
- measuring multiple attachments:
- babies may not have shown distress due to attachment but instead because their playmates have left them
- there is a problem in defining the difference between an attachment figure and a playmate
- conflicting evidence:
- it is not clear on whether babies can form multiple attachments
- research implies that they can only be formed when infants have formed a primary attachment
- stage theories:
- they suggest that development is inflexible (e.g. single attachments happen before multiple)
- in other cultures forming multiple attachments may be the norm
14
Q
What is the role of the father?
A
- Grossman et al (2002) carried out a longitudinal study of babies’ attachments til teens
- found that quality of baby’s attachment with mothers was related to later attachments (but not with fathers)
- supports the idea that attachment with fathers is less important
- however, he found that the quality of father’s play with babies was related to further attachments
- ** fathers have a different role to mothers **