Attachment Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What 4 behaviours are commonly used to identify attachment?

A

Separation anxiety
Stranger anxiety
Reunion behaviour
Willingness to explore

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is meant by the term reciprocity?

A

A two-way process by which each party responds to the others actions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is meant by the term interactional synchrony?

A

The way in which two people imitate or mirror what the other is doing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Who investigated interactional synchrony?

A

Meltzoff and Moore (1983) had an adult display facial gestures which often resulted in imitation.
Conclusion: higher levels of interactional synchrony means better quality attachment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is a problem with Meltzoff and Moore’s experiment (1983) ?

A

The baby may just be doing pseudo imitation, a form of ‘response training’ by getting a reward, or a good reaction from the mother as a result of doing a certain action, its more unconscious imitation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What did Isabella and Belsky (1991) suggest about interactions?

A

The differing interactional behaviours helped to predict attachment quality (secure and insecure attachment interactions)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What evidence is there to support reciprocity?

A

Murray and Trevarthen (1985) found that infants shown a smiling woman were also happy, but when shown a sad/straight face the baby began to cry.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was done to overcome the problem of children being active compared to imitation?

A

M+M has an external judge look at the baby’s behaviour without knowing what was being imitated
Children also sleep 12-16 hours, this can’t be helped, often creates small samples

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Who failed to replicated experiments on reciprocity and interactional synchrony?

A

Oostenbroek et al (2016) and Koepke et all (1983) both showed that the baby did not really have any response to the facial gestures of the researchers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was the Schaffer and Emerson (1964) experiment?

A

60 infants from majority working class families observed every 4 weeks over 18 months
They were measured on separation protest and stranger anxiety

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is stage 1 of attachment?

A

Indiscriminate Attachment : 0-8 weeks
Comfort from any adult or any object
Smiles at everyone
Happier in presence of humans

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is stage 2 of attachment?

A

Beginnings of attachment : 2-7 months
Recognise and smile more at familiar people
Preference for people rather than objects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is stage 3 of attachment?

A

Discriminate attachments : 7-12 months
Primary attachment to one person
Show separation and stranger anxiety
Uses familiar adults as a secure base

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is stage 4 attachment?

A

Multiple attachments : 1 year +
Form secondary attachment with familiar adults which they spend time with

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the strengths of the schaffer and emmerson findings?

A
  • identifies clear stages of attachment
  • bowlby and ainsworth research supports this idea
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the weaknesses of the schaffer and emmerson findings?

A
  • timings of stages not clear
  • studies of orphans contradict this
  • difference in quality of attachment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What are the strengths of the schaffer and emmerson methodology?

A
  • longitudinal study
  • naturalistic setting
  • large sample size
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What are the weaknesses of the schaffer and emmerson methodology?

A
  • longitudinal have drop outs
  • lots of extraneous variables (baby may become familiar with researcher)
  • sample may not be representative
  • behaviour from mother may not be recalled correctly
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is the traditional role of the father?

A
  • not likely to be primary C-G
  • women often have hormones associated with care for a child that men don’t have
  • time is not correlated to attachment tho
  • men sometimes less sensitive to infant cues
    ^ but men and women had the same psychological response to a video of an infant
  • fathers generally more playful and mentally challenging (problem solving positivity)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What is the traditional role of the father?

A
  • not likely to be primary C-G
  • women often have hormones associated with care for a child that men don’t have
  • time is not correlated to attachment tho
  • men sometimes less sensitive to infant cues
    ^ but men and women had the same psychological response to a video of an infant
  • fathers generally more playful and mentally challenging (problem solving positivity)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

smthg about mothers and fathers working after giving birth and who cares for the child

A

page 13

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What 2 parts are there to the learning theory as an explanation for attachment?

A

Classical conditioning - mum is conditioned stimulus with a conditioned response for food

Operant conditioning - food is primary reinforcer and mum is secondary

known as the cupboard love theories

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What evidence contradicts the cupboard love theory?

A

In Schaffers and emmerson, 39% of people who fed, changed and bathed was not the primary caregiver

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What was Lorenz (1952) animal study?

A

He looked at geese and their attachment. They imprinted within a few hours.
Would not recognize biological mother.
Affected later mating preferences

25
Q

What was Harlow (1958) animals study?

A

One wire mother that fed monkey and another cloth.
Monkey preferred cloth mother ‘contact comfort’ (17-18 hours but 1 hour with wire)
All monkeys didn’t have normal social behaviour (more aggressive and less sociable)

26
Q

What 6 things were included in Bowlby’s theory of attachment?

A

Social releasers
Monotropy
Innate predisposition
critical period
internal working model
adaptive

page 19

27
Q

page 21

A

si

28
Q

What was the ainsworth experiment (1970)

A

100 child mother pairs
3 minute episodes with 15 second record times
cargiver sits and watches child play - wte
stranger enters
caregiver leaves and returns
leaves again and stranger interacts
returns

29
Q

What are the 3 types of attachment?

A

Insecure- avoidant (Type A) 22%
Secure attachment (Type B) 66%
Insecure-resistant (Type C) 12%

30
Q

page 24

A
31
Q

What was the 4th attachment style and who proposed it?

A

Main and Soloman (1986)
Insecure Disorganized (Type D)

32
Q

What does GRAVE stand for in evaluation?

A

Generalisability
Reliability
Applicability
Validity (internal)
Ethical issues

33
Q

G evaluation of ainsworth research :

A

Lacks ecological validity - artificial environment (Smith and Noble 1987 found it linked to life tho)
Lacks population validity - mostly white Americans (ethnocentric)

34
Q

R evaluation of ainsworth research?

A

Interobserver reliability - he found there was almost perfect agreement in rating the child’s behaviour

35
Q

A evaluation of ainsworth research

A

Caregivers taught to understand thier infants cues reducing disorganised caregivers from 60 to 15% and increase in securely attached from 32 to 40%

36
Q

V evaluation of ainsworth research?

A

demand characteristics - display socially acceptable behaviours

37
Q

E evaluation of ainsworth research?

A

protection from harm and informed consent

38
Q

Who conducted the cross cultural variations of the Ainsworth experiment?

A

Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg (1988)

39
Q

What were in the cross cultural variations?

A

32 different studies
1990 pairs of mother-child attachments

40
Q

What were the findings of the cross cultural variations?

A

Japan 5% 68% 27%
UK 22% 75% 3%

41
Q

What was the Takahashi (1990) experiment?

A

60 middle class Japanese infants
0% (A) 68% (B) 32% (C)
but they had to remove the separation stage due to extreme distress

42
Q

Evaluation of the cross cultural variations

A
  • designed accoring to american standards of a secure attachments
  • japnese collectivist culture
  • lacks population validity
  • categorised differently by researchers?
    -mover half are US studies
  • some experiments had small sample sizes
43
Q

What are the 3 main strands to Bowlby’s thoery of maternal deprivation?

A
  • The value of maternal care
  • Critical period (2 1/2)
  • Long-term consequence
44
Q

What are the 4 main long-term consequences of maternal daprivation?

A

emotional maladjustment
mental health problems
intellectual development
later social relationship ( interal working model)

45
Q

What was Bowlby’s 44 thieves study?

A

1944
14-44 thieves were affectionless psychopaths
12/14 Ap’s had experiences motherly deprivation for at least a week before the age of 5 years old
5/30 of the toher thieves this was only true for

46
Q

What were the methodological critisisms of Bowlby’s 44 thieves?

A

Retrospective only - data collected from mother in memory form
Experimenter bias - Bowlby conducted it himself, he knew wether they we thieves or not

47
Q

What study supported Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation?

A

Goldfarb (1947)
30 teenagers, half adopted before 12 months, some after 3 1/2 years
Longer in the institution = less well on tests of intelligence, independence, self-control and language and were likely to be hyperactive, aggressive, deceitful and emotionally insecure.

48
Q

What study contradicted Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation?

A

Lewis (1954)
Large sample of 500
No link to prolonged separation and criminality (criminality caused by other factors such as poverty)

49
Q

What is privation in the context of maternal privation?

A

A child fails to form an attachment in the first place
Results in long term emotional development problems

50
Q

What is deprivation in the context of maternal deprivation?

A

A child’s attachment is broken or lost
Less likely to result in long term emotional developmental problems

51
Q

page 43 has further evaluation of bowlby if you want

A

:)

52
Q

What is the Rutter study?

A

Began in 1998
Studied 165 Romanian Orphans

53
Q

What 3 groups did Rutter study?

A

Adopted before the age of 6 months
Adopted between 6 months and 2 years
Adopted after the age of two (late adoptees).

54
Q

What were Rutter’s findings in intellectual development?

A

Adopted earlier : Mean IQ of 102
Adopted later : Mean IQ 86 for 6m-2y and 77 for 2y+

55
Q

What were Rutter’s findings in emotional development?

A

Adopted earlier : by age 6 they were making good recoveries
Adopted later : often developed disinhibited attachment (friendly to everyone) with other behavioral disorders

56
Q

What are some strengths to Rutter’s study?

A
  • longitudinal
  • range of measures (reliable)
  • natural experiment (no ethical issues)
57
Q

What are some weaknesses to Rutter’s study?

A
  • children have prior history (lacks internal validity)
  • high drop out rates
  • pressure on families to take part in research (ethical issues)
58
Q

What did Hazer and Shaver (1987) study?

A

‘love quiz’
similar to childhood

59
Q

Why can’t you use childhood to assume later relationships?

A
  • retrospective only
  • correlation =/ causality