Aggression AO3 Flashcards
strength 1 of neural/hormonal mechanisms
I: sup evi for role of limbic system
E: ultimatum game and FMRI - proposer/receivers- when offered unfair amount of money stimulation in amygdala increased (aggressive response)
C: adds validity
strength 2 of neural/hormonal mechanisms
I: sup evi for role of serotonin
E: pps given either anti depressant or placebo and were then asked to give shocks to a confederate who mad a mistake on another task- less shocks were given by pps with history of aggression who had anti depressants that increased serotonin levels
C: adds validity
weakness of neural/hormonal mechanisms
I: methodological flaws- lack mundane realism
E: lab based games (ultimatum game) unlike real life- artificial and have no consequence for aggressive reaction or risk of retaliation that may occur in real world reducing aggression
C:reduces validity and generalisability
strength 3 of neural/hormonal mechanisms
I: sup evi for role of testosterone
E: 60 male offenders from max security prisons - testosterone levels and aggression measured- positive correlation found
C:adds validity
weakness 2 of neural/hormonal mechanisms
I: sup evi for testosterone is correlational
E: cant establish cause and effect- could be environmental factors that have impact of aggression levels e.g. upbringing and role models.
C: decreases validity
strength 1 of genetic factors
I:sup evi for twin and adoption studies
E: (hutchings)- meta analysis of 14000 adopted people in denmark- positive correlation found between number of violent convictions among biological parent and adopted sons.
C: adds validity
weakness 1 of genetic factors
I: method issues with twin studies
E: concordance rates in MZ twins never 100% despite 100% genes shared- must be some environmental factor affecting levels of aggression- concordance may be higher than DZs due to more similar environment
C: reduces validity
strength 2 of genetic factors
I: sup evi for role of MAOA
E: 28 members of dutch family all involved in murder, rape and assaults- all have MAOA-L gene
C: add validity
weakness 2 of genetic factors
I: gene-environment interactions must be considered
E: research has found association between aggression/antisocial behaviour and MAOA-L gene but only for those with childhood trauma
C: reduces validity
strength 1 of ethological explanations
I: sup evi for ritualistic aggression in humans
E: Yonomamo people use chest pounding and club fights to settle conflict before extreme aggression
C:Adds validity
weakness 1 of ethological explanations
I:Cont evi for ritualistic aggression in animals
E:Study on chimpanzees show male chimps slaughtering all members of another group in coordinated attacks despite defencelessness
C: Reduces validity
weakness 2 of ethological explanations
I:Evidence aggression is not universal or independent of individual experience
E: environmental factors can influence aggressive behaviour in animals- FAP now Model action patterns with differences amongst the same species
C:Incomplete explanation
weakness 3 of ethological explanations
I:Culturally relative and not universal
E: (Nisbett)Lab experiment with South and north American white males insulted- South Americans had more aggressive responses
C:Can’t be generalised
strength 1 of evolutionary explanations (SJ)
I:Sup evi for sexual jealousy
E: Research into intimate partner violence using self-report shows positive correlation between reports of mate retention tactics and violence
C:Add validity
strength 2 of evolutionary explanations (WF)
I: supporting evidence for warfare
E:Yanamamo tribe showed constant fighting to access females and improve status- successful warriors had more wives and children
C: add validity that aggression in warfare has reproductive benefits
strength 3 of evolutionary explanations
I:Accounts for gender differences
E: there are few warrior female societies as women risk loss of offspring and reproductive damage from aggression- use verbal aggression instead
C: valid in showing why females use aggression less
weakness 1 of evolutionary explanations
I:Method issues with supporting evidence
E:Correlational and self-report could be third factor such as substance misuse leading to violence or inaccurate information given
C: can’t establish cause and effect
weakness 2 of evolutionary explanations
I:Aggression not always adaptive
E:Could be maladaptive as aggressive males may not appear attractive female mate due to risk of injury and death
C:Reduces validity
strength 1 of frustration aggression hypothesis
I:Supporting experimental evidence
E: (Geen)- used impossible jigsaw to frustrate male Pps Before asking them to give electric shock to Confederate who made a mistake on another task frustrated participants gave more intense shocks than controls
C: Adds validity
strength 2 of frustration aggression hypothesis
I: supporting evidence for revised model
E: (pricks) Swedish football hooliganism investigated- found that more objects were thrown when team performed worse than expected
C: add validity that Unanticipated events cause aggression
strength 3 of frustration aggression hypothesis
I:Further supporting evidence for revised model
E: (Reifman) Examined baseball games and found as temperature is increased so did the display of aggressive behaviour of pitchers towards batters (higher ball speeds)
C:Add validity
weakness of frustration aggression hypothesis
I:Contradictory evidence for catharsis
E: (bushman) found frustrated participants you vented anger by hitting punchbag were more aggressive in later task than those who didn’t vent
C:Reduces the validity
strength 1 of social learning theory
I:Supporting evidence
E: Bandura Bobo doll study- Children who watched aggressive model when more aggressive themselves than non-aggressive model condition
C:Add validity to observation and imitation of role models
strength 2 of social learning theory
I:Supporting evidence from replications of research
E:Replication of Bobo doll study found that children are more likely to imitate aggressive behaviour if model was rewarded with toy or cookie rather than defeated as punishment
C: Add validity to vicarious reinforcement