6.3: Psychological Influences On The Team Flashcards
social inhibition definition:
- the negative effect of the presence of others on performance
Social facilitation definition:
- the positive effect of the presence of others on performance
Who can affect performance?
- the audience: very presence caused added pressure
- the co-actors: doing the same activity but not in competition. E.g. jogging
- the competitive co-actors (competitors): e.g. 100m sprint, 7 other sprinters
- the social reinforcers (coach): these are people who have a direct influence on the performance and their presence je a part of the event.
The Zajonc model:
- see flashcard
What is apprehension evaluation?
- ‘the perceived fear of being judged’
- others only have influence if the performer feels they are being judged or evaluated.
- arousal increases when performer thinks they are being judged or analysed.
- could lead to Spain inhibition or social facilitation
- the effects of the audience could motivate the player to play well but it could also increase anxiety and arousal to very high levels meaning there is a significant reduction in performance.
What are ways to prevent social inhibition?
- getting the players familiar with playing in front of a crowd
- gradually introducing evaluation
- improving focus and concentration
- reducing the importance of an event
- verbal encouragement
- ensuring skills are over/well learnt so dominant response is correct.
What is group dynamics?
- a team is more than just a group of individuals
- individuals have to work together to achieve a goal and may have to plate/ perform different functions to make the team unit complete
What are the characteristics of group dynamics?
- a collective identity - e.g. same kit
- gives motivation/sense or pride
- sense of belonging
- interaction - working together to complete a task
- performer as an individual which leads into group dynamics
- communication - verbal and non-verbal
- a shared goal or purpose - the prospect of achieving success.
What are Tuckman’s stages of group development
- forming
- storming
- norming
- performing
- mourning
What is the forming stage?
- getting to know each other, group comes together for the first time
- done out about the task or objective (begin to tackle the problem)
- show respect for each other, but not necessarily working together
- the coach tells them what to do (coach orientated)
What is the storming stage?
- ideas for solutions are put forwards by individuals
- team members compete with each other, forming alliances; there may be power struggles
- different types of leaders emerge
- difficult stage, the team may fail
- coach’s aim is to get though we quick as possible
- e.g. players having to adjust to a different position
What is the norming stage?
- team members agree how to work together
- development of trust, ability to accept criticism and new ideas
- leaders emerge and start to take responsibility for the decision making
- coach becomes more of a consultant (becomes less directive)
- team settles down and cooperates with the intention of achieving their goals
What is the performing stage?
- team works as a unit, high levels of independence and motivation
- produce high quality performance/begin to achieve
- however, this stage isn’t reached by all
What is the mourning stage?
- stage that often occurs when goals have been achieved and the team may begin to disband, then start again
- e.g. a team who wins the PL in football may then recruit new players after losing some of its players - Leicester FC.
How often does group development stages occur?
- every year or so when new players and/of coaches join
- international teams may take longer since the players meet up infrequently and have to learn unfamiliar tactics and roles
What are the factors affecting the length of time to complete the process?
- the size of the group
- the difficulty of the task
- the experience of the players
What is cohesion?
- the tendency for individuals to work together to achieve their goals, the forces that keep the group members on task
- some psychologists argue that the team has to be cohesive in order to achieve any success while others believe that cohesion developed as team becomes successful
What is co-action?
- when others do the same task but separately. e.g. rowing - when all crew have to work together
(In order to be cohesive every team member must be involved)
What is interaction?
- a group works together to produce results.
- e.g. in team sports, each player has a different role which has to be integrated with the roles of other team members.
Carron’s antecedents - influences on the team cohesion:
- environmental factors
- personal factors
- leadership factors
- team factors
Environmental factors:
- includes size of the group and the time available
- the longer a team is together, the more time they will have to learn each other’s roles
- the size can affect cohesion - the larger the group, the better the change of more productivity.
HOWEVER;
- with a large group, there is more chance of social loafing and the Ringelmann effect.
- motivation may be lost within a large group
- cliques or sub-divisions can form in large teams
- a mix of age and gender may reduce cohesion and the desire to reach common goals.
Personal factors:
- refers to the similarity of group members in terms of their aspirations, opinions and values
- whether they are happy with the role they play in the team and even how fit they are.
Leadership factors:
- refers to the leadership style chosen by the coach or captain. How the coach gets on either the others in the team is important
- e.g. Tracey Neville: England netball coach (appointed 2015) and has shown excellent leadership qualities.