6 - Presence of Others Flashcards

1
Q

define group polarisation

A

group interaction with those who have similar attitudes strengthens indiv’s atts so they become more extreme

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

define risky shift

A

groups tending to make more risky decisions than indivs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

how can attitudes become more reinforced by verbalising opinions

A

anticipating someone w an opposite view and assoc w those w a similar view means we prepare arguments and express view more strongly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

how is normative influence a cause for group polarisation

A

express stronger att so like-minded like us or change att to avoid disapproval when comparing attitudes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

define pluralistic ignorance

A

majority of group members privately rejecting a norm but mistakenly thinking the group accepts it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

how can we get rid of pluralistic ignorance

A

through group discussion so we slowly see others’ attitudes and express if similar or conceal it or jump on the bandwagon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

how is informational influence a cause of group polarisation

A

when unsure, majority will support dominant opinion when in group discussion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

how can opinions become more extreme in group discussion

A

adding familiar arguments and new persuasive ideas can sway attitude

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

with conformity, what processes are involved in forming a representation of the group norm from opinions expressed in the ig vs og

A

identification means conforming to group norm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

in identification what happens if the group norm is or isn’t polarised

A
is = group polarisation occurs
isn't = take the mean group attitude
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

in Triplett’s social facilitation study, what were the findings

A

when in competition, half were facilitated, some were inhibited but practice effect was confounding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what did Zajonc’s social facilitation theory state

A

presence of observers leads to general drive state through physiological arousal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Zajonc said what happens if the responses are well learned

A

facilitation, enhanced performance, usually w easy tasks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Zajonc said what happens when the responses aren’t well learned

A

inhibition, worsened performance, usually w difficult tasks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what did Cottrell’s findings contradict about Zajonc’s theory

A

indiv must think the audience are watching and it’s not just mere presence affecting performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

describe evaluation apprehension

A

individuals become worried about how the audience will evaluate their performance on a task as self-presentation is important

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

what do performing well and badly lead to

A

well means praise and recognition

badly means embarrassment and shame

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

what different arousal types are there when we think we’ll do well or badly

A
challenge = good so facilitation
threat = bad so inhibition
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

after evaluation apprehension what do we think about

A

whether we have enough resources for a sufficient performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

with evaluation apprehension, do we need observers

A

no bc we just worry about others’ evaluation whether they’re there or not

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

describe distraction theory

A

cog load taken up by attention split w distractor stimulus so have fewer resources for task at hand

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

in distraction theory, what will happen depending on whether the task is easy or not

A

well-learned = dominant means unaffected performance

hard/not well learned = non-dominant so worse performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

describe the self-awareness explanation

A

we compare actual and ideal performances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

what do small and large discrepancies with performances cause

A
small = motivation = better performance
large = give up as ideal performance hard to match
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

how does being self-conscious affect performance

A

worsens it even if well-learnt as worry about self-presentation so hindered performance is failure anticipated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

define the overloaded explanation

A

feeling overloaded in presence of an audience distracts us from cues we need to attend to

27
Q

how does the influence of others depend on the nature of the task

A

process loss can occur where group performance is worse than sum of indivs’ performance
distractors and dominant group members lead to performance loss

28
Q

define social loafing

A

expending less effort when doing a task as a group relative to alone as we think others will put more effort in

29
Q

define free ride effect

A

individuals taking advantage of shared resources without making an appropriate contribution

30
Q

define the Ringelmann effect

A

collective sum of efforts for a group is less than the sum of potential indiv efforts summed up

31
Q

what did a study of the Ringelmann effect find

A

mean total exertion force went up as group size did but individual mean total force decreased

32
Q

what is the equation for the Ringelmann effect

A

total capacity - (coordination loss + motivation loss)

33
Q

what did a study find out about noise level and presence of others

A

noise level decreased as group size increased but directional coordination loss through microphone placement

34
Q

how is evaluation apprehension related to social loafing

A

tasks related to social loafing decrease it as people don’t think they’re being watched so not accountable for behaviour and less identifiability

35
Q

what is effort matching in terms of social loafing

A

thinking others are putting in less effort so we put in less effort so we don’t experience the sucker effect

36
Q

define dispensability of effort related to social loafing

A

we think our effort is less valuable and impactful if there’re more people

37
Q

what is expectancy in terms of social loafing

A

think about if own effort will enhance group performance and if group’s high quality performance will reach an outcome

38
Q

describe valence of outcome in terms of social loafing

A

how valuable the end-goal is

39
Q

how do values matter with social loading

A

we loaf less if we think our interaction w the group is worthy

40
Q

how does liking matter in terms of social loafing

A

we group members are friendly or we can identify with them, we loaf less

41
Q

what type of personality loafs less

A

conscientious, responsible, narcissists

42
Q

define groupthink

A

group making bad decisions through poor critical evaluation as group cohesion is seen as more important than decisions

43
Q

groupthink keychain to a bad outcome

A

group cohesiveness, structural faults, and sit context = groupthink = symptoms of gt = symp of defective decision making = outcome

44
Q

real-world example of groupthink?

A

challenger disaster: concerns at low levels not told to high authority levels despite group having access to info preventing launch

45
Q

what did an analysis of the presidential commission report find

A

> 50% statements supported groupthink

all statements ab faulty components were groupthink

46
Q

criticisms of the challenger disaster being groupthink?

A

limited, retrospective evidence
good decision-making = bad decisions
norms of cohesive groups can mean good decisions
whole groupthink model studied in few experimental tests which reported mixed findings

47
Q

what are some factors of good decision making

A
impartiality
allow outside criticisms
discuss issues before final decision
have a critical evaluator
members open to criticise
48
Q

define deindividuation

A

being unable to differentiate between different people

49
Q

define contagion

A

ideas spreading quickly, unpredictably, can’t resist passing on ideas

50
Q

what happens when we become anonymous

A

disinhibition occurs, freed from normative constraints, become irrational and animalistic

51
Q

what do attentional cues mean for self-awareness

A

respond less to norms, more to immediate situation, act imoulsively

52
Q

what are accountability cues

A

factors determining whether one’ll be held responsible for their actions or not

53
Q

how does it feel when we’re less accountable for things

A

more likely to do gratifying but inhibiting behaviours

54
Q

what did the Halloween study find about deindividuation

A

most transgressed when anonymous but being unaccountable/unidentifiable leads to prosocial behaviour

55
Q

in the emergent norms theory, when are suggestions more influential

A

if they’re similar to predispositions of the crowd

56
Q

in the emergent norms theory, what does the crowd understand

A

consensual understanding of what’s right and wrong

57
Q

in the emergent norms theory, how does the crowd conform

A

through normative social influence

58
Q

in the emergent norms theory, what are 3 criticisms related to not being specific/descriptive

A

norms not constructed from scratch, general norms used
describes but doesn’t explain principles for adopted roles
unspecific about crowd formation/organisation

59
Q

in the emergent norms theory, what are 2 criticisms related to differentiatoin

A

collective behaviour not that different from aggregated indiv behaviour
keynoter defined as someone influential but model says they aren’t influential

60
Q

in the social identity model of crowd action, what do people have increased awareness of

A

norms awareness are group conscious

61
Q

in the social identity model of crowd action, what effect does anonymity have

A

enhances social identity so conform to group than general social norms more

62
Q

in the social identity model of crowd action, what identity is derived from what other identity

A

context-specific derived from superordinate

63
Q

in the social identity model of crowd action, the emergent norms are appropriate for who

A

members of this category in this context