3.12 Application of financial statement analysis Flashcards
A company’s historical performance can be analyzed and compared to that of its peers or across time. The analysis should include what happened and why it happened.
Key questions include:
How and why have measures of profitability, efficiency, liquidity, and solvency changed over time?
How do the above measures compare to peers?
What are the critical aspects of performance? How did the company do on those critical aspects?
What is the company’s business model? How was it reflected in the performance?
Past performance is more useful for mature companies than start-ups.
Mature companies
Credit analysis
the evaluation of credit risk, which is the possibility of losses due to a counterparty’s failure to meet its payment obligations.
Because debt obligations are almost always met with cash, credit analysts give particular attention to metrics based on operating cash flows.
Factors that are considered as part of a quantitative credit analysis include:
Scale
Business profile
Leverage tolerance
Financial policy
Factors that are considered as part of a quantitative credit analysis include:
Scale
Companies with a history of success and strong purchasing power relative to their suppliers are better positioned to respond to adverse events and market conditions.
Larger companies also typically have better access to capital markets.
Factors that are considered as part of a quantitative credit analysis include:
Business profile
Companies are more creditworthy if they have relatively stable and predictable profit margins and cash flows.
A geographically diverse customer base is also beneficial.
Factors that are considered as part of a quantitative credit analysis include:
Leverage tolerance
Companies with lower costs, especially lower fixed costs, are better positioned to meet their borrowing obligations.
Factors that are considered as part of a quantitative credit analysis include:
Financial policy
Companies with more debt in the capital structure have a lower ability to tolerate financial risk.
Back-testing
can be done to see how a particular screen would have performed in the past
biases against back-testing
Survivorship bias exists if the data includes only companies or funds that have survived to the end of the data period.
Look-ahead bias occurs if screens are based on data that would not have been available when the investment decision was made.
Data-snooping refers to using the same dataset as other researchers to test the same or similar screens.
The task of comparing companies’ financial statements can be complicated by several factors:
Companies adhere to different sets of accounting standards (e.g., IFRS, US GAAP).
Companies may choose between different methods and models (e.g., historical cost, fair value)
Companies have some discretion in making estimates (e.g., useful lives of PP&E)
Financial statement disclosures are often insufficient to allow for specific comparison, but analysts may use the following ratios as indicators of a company’s use of its fixed assets:
Share of useful life that has passed
Average age of asset base
Years of useful life remaining
Average life of assets at acquisition
Share of asset base being renewed
Share of useful life that has passed formula
Accumulated Depreciation / Gross PPE
Average age of asset base formula
Accumulated Depreciation / Depreciation Expense
Years of useful life remaining formula
Net PPE / Depreciation expense