3.1 - Business Growth Flashcards
Why do firms want to grow?
- Larger firms often have easier access to finance
- Growth provides opportunities for product diversification
- Owners/shareholders desire for higher levels of profit
- Desire for stronger market power (monopoly) so as to increase profits
- Desire to reduce costs by benefitting from economies of scale
- Owners/Shareholders/Managers desire to run a large business & continually seek to grow it
Why do small firms exist?
- They offer a more personalised service & focus on building relationships with their customers
- Rapid growth can cause diseconomies of scale which can be difficult to deal with & so many owners choose to avoid these
- Many small firms operate in mass markets with low barriers to entry
- Owners goal is not profit maximisation but rather an acceptable quality of life (satisficing)
- Unable to access finance for expansion
- They provide a product that is in a niche market - smaller market size but can be very profitable
What is divorce of ownership of control?
- As firms grow, the owners (or shareholders) often appoint managers to run the business for them - separation (divorce) between the owners and the managers who control the day-to-day running of the business
What is the principle agent problem?
- The principal-agent problem arises when the interests of a company’s owners (the principals) are not aligned with those of its managers (the agents) who make decisions on their behalf
- This can lead to conflicts of interest, as managers may prioritize their own goals over the objectives of the company’s owners
What is the distinction between public and private organisations?
- Public sector organisations are owned & controlled by the Government - their goal is not profit maximisation but to provide a service, e.g. corporations like BBC or civil service departments like education
- Private sector organisations are owned & controlled by private individuals (vary from sole traders to partners to company shareholders) - goal is usually profit maximisation -> often causes the private sector to be more efficient than the public sector with higher levels of productivity
What is the distcinction between profit and not-for-profit organisations?
- Most firms In the private sector exist to make a profit, even if their goal is not profit maximisation
- Exceptions to this are not-for-profit organisations which also operate in the private sector - exist to provide a service or meet a need
- Many sell goods/services & use the profits they generate to further their objectives, e.g. The British Heart Foundation
- The government exempts them from paying direct taxes
What are the different types of business growth?
- organic growth
- forward and backward vertical integration
- horizontal integration
- conglomerate integration
What are different ways of organic growth?
- gaining greater market share
- product diversification
- opening a new store
- international expansion
- investing in new technology/production machinery
What is the distinction between organic and external growth? Give real-life examples of inorganic!
- Organic: growth driven by internal expansion using reinvested profits or loans
- External: growth that occurs as a result of mergers or takeovers e.g. Google bought Youtube for $1.65bn in 2006 or T-mobile merged with orange -> EE - 30mil customers
What are the advantages and disadvantages of organic growth? Real-life examples?
Advantages:
- The pace of growth is manageable
- Less risky - growth is financed by profits & there is expertise in the industry
- Avoids diseconomies of scale
- Keep ownership and control
Disadvantages:
- Slower growth for directors who wish to maximise salaries - e.g. Basecamp grew to $100mil in revenue per yr in 20yrs
- Not necessarily able to benefit from economies of scale
- Access to finance may be limited
- Lose ownership and control by selling shares/franchises - e.g. Uber’s founder sold too many shares -> owns only 10%
- Difficult for firms to get new ideas
What is forward vertical integration? Examples?
- Involves a merger or takeover with a firm further forward in the supply chain
E.g. A dairy farmer merges with an ice-cream manufacturer or Ford integrated with its tire manufacturer
What is backward vertical integration?
- Involves a merger/takeover with a firm further backward in the supply chain
E.g. An ice-cream retailer takes over an ice-cream manufacturer
What are the advantages of vertical integration?
- Reduced COP as middleman profits are eliminated e.g. delivery costs eliminated when Ford acquired tyre maker
- Greater control over the supply chain reduces risk as access to raw materials is more certain
- Quality of raw materials can be controlled
- Forward integration adds additional profit as the profits from the next stage of production are assimilated
- Forward integration can increase brand visibility
What are the disadvantages of vertical integration? Give examples.
- Diseconomies of scale occur as costs increase e.g. unnecessary duplication of management roles
- Regulation - OFGEM has prevented electricty producers from integrating with the power grid (causes consumer exploitation)
- Culture clash between the two firms that have merged
- Possibly little expertise in running the new firm results in inefficiencies -> CoOp vertically integrated with farms but productivity fell
- The price paid for the new firm may take a long time to recoup
What is horizontal integration?
A merger/takeover of a firm in the same stage of production and business area e.g. T-mobile and Orange merged to make EE
What are the advantages of horizontal integration?
- Rapid increase of market share
- Gain monopoly power
- 2+2=5 output rises exponentially due to increased expertise gained
- Reductions in the cost per unit due to economies of scale
- Reduces competition - wasted money on trying to steal away competitors
- Existing knowledge of the industry means the merger is more likely to be successful
- Rationalisation - when a firm reorganises to cut costs -. cutting out duplicate marketing teams, printers etc
What are the disadvantages of horizontal integration? (include real-world examples)
- Internal diseconomies of scale may occur as costs increase e.g. unnecessary duplication of
management roles - Job losses - Orange & T-mobile -> 1200 job losses
- Brand dilution - become associated with integrated firm -> worsens brand reputation
- There can be a culture clash between the two firms that have merged
What is conglomerate integration?
Merger/takeover of firms in entirely different industries e.g. Pepsi and Quaker oats or an ice cream manufacturer buys a clothing compnay
What are the advantages of conglomerate integration?
- Reduces overall risk of business failure
- Increased size and connections in new industries opens up new opportunities for growth
- Internal EOS -> reduced cost of failure by diversifying
- Allows for growth when current markets are saturated
- Knowledge transfers e.g. when Apple bought Beats
- Increased brand awareness e.g. Tata merged with Starbucks to set up Indian Starbucks
- Parts of the new business may be sold for profit as they are duplicated in other parts of the conglomerate
What are the disadvantages of conglomerate integration?
- Possible lack of expertise in new products/industries
- Diseconomies of scale can quickly develop - communication and coordination problems e.g. Pepsi & Quaker Oats
- Job losses
- Finance required
- Worker dissatisfaction due to unhappiness at the takeover can reduce productivity
What are the reasons for demergers?
- Reducing diseconomies of scale: decreasing the size of the firm can reduce the diseconomies & lower the cost/unit which increases the profitability
- Increased business focus: if efforts & resources are scattered across a large number of firms/ industries it can be hard to maintain focus and profitability - narrowing focus can improve profitability
- Increase liquidity & dividend payments: generates extra revenue for the firm in the year they occur - may increase the profit & dividend payments
- Remove loss-making divisions: can be more profitable to remove loss-making divisions & replace them with outsourcing
- Cultural differences: most common reason for failures of mergers - sometimes these differences are irreconcilable & not worth the expense to change
- Comply with the demands of the Competition Commission: sometimes firms are forced to demerge by the competition regulator due to concerns about the high market share they may have, which is considered to be anti-competitive & bad for consumers
What are the impacts of demergers on the firm conducting the demerger?
- Opportunity for a more narrow focus on the core business
- Removing loss-making portions of the business
- Increased efficiency and lower costs/unit
- Increasing the annual profits for the year that the demerger occurred
- Removing some difficult cultural differences
What are the constraints on business growth?
- Size of the market: the more niche the market the smaller the number of potential customers. Even large firms face this constraint as they move closer to capturing the domestic market - to increase market size they will have to expand internationally
- Access to finance: small firms find it harder to access loans as they are considered to be more risky than larger firms - interest rates also tend to be higher
- Owner objectives: Many owners desire to grow a business to a point that provides a certain lifestyle or standard of living - and not beyond.
- Regulation: Large firms are often constrained by competition regulation that aims to limit monopoly power + firms that sell demerit goods have growth limited by government policies such as age restrictions, minimum prices & indirect taxes
What are the impacts of demergers on employees?
- Some workers may lose their jobs
- Reduced friction from cultural differences can help build better team dynamics
- Smaller workforce provides more opportunity for promotion
- Less complication in daily tasks due to more narrow focus