298 Crusades Lecture 10 Feb 26 Flashcards
- Crusading was extremely dangerous.
Only about fifty percent ever returned. Battle, disease.
.
- Crusading required taking a quasi-clerical vow. Public vow. To go and pray at Holy Sepulchre. Arms blessed. No getting out of this vow.
Church afforded various protections and privileges until the vow was completed: suspension of all interest on debts, protection of lands (those who attacked a crusader’s lands while he was away who subject to excommunication).
Supposed to live pure lives; no sex.
Knight becoming somewhat clerical during the crusade.
.
- Very expensive.
Estimates based on charters demonstrate it cost 3 to 6 times someone’s annual income to go on crusade. Because of this, crusade armies naturally crystalized around wealthy lords who could liquidate sufficient assets to support a large retinue.
Vassals often joined their lords, sometimes at their own expense.
.
- Tangible returns on the crusades were very scarce. Very rare to bring back any booty of any kind.
.
- Armies of the Prince’s Crusade had more discipline, skill, diplomatic contacts, money.
Consisted of: great nobles and lords (no kings), important churchmen, large numbers of knights (free and dependent), footsoldiers, servants, camp-followers, subsidized pilgrims
.
- Majority of the participants from between the Rhine and Atlantic, English Channel and Mediterranean: ie, mostly France.
.
- Cohesion of the crusade: shared objectives, shared peril.
.
- Godfrey of Bouillon, duke of Lower Lorraine
loyal and large military household lent him power
behaved as if he was Alexius’ equal
.
- Godfrey of Bouillon, duke of lower Lorraine. Powerful noble. Liquidated much of his properly to afford this crusade. Not all; he left a nucleus from which to rebuild his power as he planned to return. Brought with him many followers, including his brother Baldwin of Boulogne. They crossed via Hungary and arrived in December of 1096.
.
- Hugh of Vermandois. Brother to king of France. Thought highly of himself. Had already written a letter to the Turkish sultan telling him about the greatness of his power and how he would soon be there to crush him. Unfortunately, he lost almost all of his army as he was crossing the Adriadic due to a storm at sea. He was the first of the major nobles to arrive at Constantinople. Alexius gave him a nice place to stay.
.
- Bohemond of Taranto. Son of the Norman leader Robert Guiscard. Robert had fought a number of wars against the Byzantines in Greece; initially rather successful. Gave his Greek properties to one son and the Italian ones to the other. When he died problem: Byzantines reconquered their lost lands.
.
- Bohemond was supposed to get Greece and so ended up with very little. So he looked at Greece and the empire as in a way his own. Clear that he saw the crusade as an opportunity to add to his rather meager territorial holdings. Crossed Adriatic and marched on the old Roman Road through Greece. Same road taken a few years earlier when he and his father were conquering Greece. Greeks in the area remembered him. He was very careful to make sure that his men did not harm the locals.
.
- Showing the emperor that he was his servant and would follow orders. Bohemond’s troops basically the best behaved of those going through Greek territory.
.
- Bohemund of Taranto
Dominant personality in the crusade’s military leadership from April 1097 to January 1099.
He does not go to Jerusalem.
Staunch ally to Alexius
..
- When Bohemund arrived at Consantinople, without his army, he was the least powerful magnate at the court.
2 months later, he was one of the undisputed leaders.
Part of this clearly due to his private diplomacy with Alexius.
.
- Bohemond probably spoke Greek and read Greek.
Tancred apparently could speak Arabic
.
Tancred of Hauteville
Nephew of Bohemond of Taranto
Refused to swear to Alexius
.
- Raymond of Toulouse
his army the largest and best funded
meticulous preparations
.
- Raymond of Toulouse the most powerful of the crusade leaders. One of the most powerful and wealthiest barons in Europe. Controlled most of the (very rich) lands in southern Italy. He had more power and wealth than the king of France. Accompanied by the papal legate Adhemar Of Le Puy. Overland via Dalmatia. Difficult as repeatedly attacked by locals who did not like their presence. Problems with Greeks as well. Arrives in April 1097. 50s on 6Os. Saw this is a lost act of life. Common pilgrimage motif.
.
- Robert of Normandy and his brother-in-law Stephen of Blois
Robert the son of William the Conqueror
Robert earned much renown on crusade
He returned home a hero
Diastrous political career, however. Life ended with 28 years of incarceration by his youngest brother, Henry I, King of England
.
- Stephen of Blois, count of Blois, had married William the Conqueror’s dauther Adela.
Reluctant crusader, but one of the wealthiest
.
- Alexius saw his interests as eternal: the benefit of the empire.
Probably minimized the importance of the reciprocal nature of his agreement with the crusaders, seeing them as effectively mercenaries
.
- Crusaders saw Alexius as a contractual lord with obligations and duties.
This would lead to trouble at Antioch
.
- Alexius was not going to admit the crusaders unless there was a clear understanding of their relationship , namely that Asia Minor was his and any lands conquered were to be restored to the emperor.
Because the crusade leaders arrived in a staggered fashion, he could bring each one into Constantinople and then negotiate individually. Each to swear on oath.
.
- Hugh had at first tried to avoid the oath, but under strong pressure he took it.
.
- Godfrey refused so Alexius refused to ferry him across the Bosphorus. Standoff. Came to blows. Eventually takes the oath.
,