Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM


Top Flashcards (Certified)
All Flashcards

4-Politics-Paper 1- Uk Politics And Ideas > 2- Electoral Systems > Flashcards

2- Electoral Systems Flashcards

1
Q

Example of gov from minority votes

A

2001 blair
Large labour majority- 413 seats
41% votes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Examples of pr systems being majority

A

2011- scottish parliamentary elections- ams- snp majority
2011- ams- welsh assembly elections- labour majority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Examples of coalition and minority gov under pr

A

-2007,2011,2016- northern ireland assembly elections- stv
All coaliution- DUP and Sinn Fein

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Example of fptp not being proportional

A

2015 UKIP
Just under 4 mill votes- 12.5% votes cast- 3rd in terms of votes
One seat commons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Examples of safe seats

A

Huntingdonshire
Bristol west one of safest- labour
47,000 votes in 2017
9,000 votes for conservatives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Most marginal seats examples
2019

A

Kensington
Bedford
Bury north

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Fptp example no votes and seats

A

Greens 2.7% votes, 1 seats- 0.2% seats
Lib dems 11.5% votes, 11 seats- 1.5% seats

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the main functions of elections

A

-choose a respresentative- speak on behalf
-choose a government- confirm legitimacy o it
Leader of the largest party- invited to be pm
-hold the gov and mps to account
Electorate can renew decision, reject unpopular party each election
-some influence on policy
Major parties may be defeated so change decisions to re-think unpopular policies
Major parties may steal successful minority policies
Gives voice for minority gov
-participation in politics
Through voting, campaigning or running as candidate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Criteria to compare electoral systems

A

-provide voters w/ clear choice
-produce fair and representative outcome
-lead to strong, legit gov with clear mandate that can pass laws effectively and heldf account for actuons
-provide effective link between reps and constituencies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Reforming electorate- essay plans- main points

A

Implications on representation
Effect on voter choice
Impact on formation of gov

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Impact of diff electoral systems on government

A

-AMS in scottish parliament and welsh assembly mroe coalitions and minorityes
-but relatively stable
-fptp not always majority
2017 minority- supply and confidence with dup
2010 coalition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Impact on parties and party systems- electoral systems

A

-more parties sucesfully competing in elections

-small extremist parties more likely

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Example of smaller power gaining power with pr

A

2007 scottish parliament
Greens.2. Seats
But used for supply and confidence iwth snp

Sae w/ may w/ dup un 2017

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Impact on voters and voter choice pr

A

-reduce wasted votes
-safe seats less likely
-increase in turnout not seen
Too complicated
Votes in disolved elections seen less important than general elections

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Voter turnout pr vs fptp

A

Scottish local elections- highest ever 63.5% 2021
General election- 67.3%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Fptp

A

Simple pluraality voting system
Person with the most votes in constituency is elected
-place cross next to name prefered candidate
Largest no. Seats forms gov

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Advantages fptp

A

-one party gov
Good working majority
Clear mandate
Stable-make decisions effectively
-strong mp-constitiuent links
Effective representation
Constituent surgeries
-extremist parties unlikely to be elected
-simple and speedy
68% voted in favour fptp over av in 2011

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Disadvantages fptp

A

-dont need majority
Fewer than half mps secure majority of votes in constituency
-not proportional or representative
Geographical concentration needed
Esp against lib dems and greens
-‘safe seats’- reduce voter choice and decrease turnout
-‘marginal’- small majority of mp sitting
Campaign is focused there
Not all votes equal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Sv

A

Supplementary voting
Majoritarian 50+%
London mayor (every 4 y), pccs
2nd vote used when under 50%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Sv advantages

A

Strong mandate
Majoritarian 50+%
Greater support
Moderate campaigns- gain 2nd preference important
Simple
Help independant candidates

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Sv disadvantages

A

-could win on 2nd vote even if most on 1st vote (as long as under 50% on first)
-not proportional
Irrelevant with mayoral elections as only one candiate
-if westminster- won majority seats but minority votes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Ams

A

Additional member system
Hybrid system
Used in elections in disolved bodies- scottish parliament, welsh assembly
Compromise as less radical
1st vote- mps
2nd vote- top up vote for party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Ams advantages

A

-more proportional- ‘top up
-retains strong mp-constituency link
-gives broadest choice to voters - to ‘split their ticket’
Same party on both or one on party and one on mep
-coalition more likely- compormise and coalition between oarties
-bote minor parties
2016- 6 seats to greens in scottish parliament

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Ams disadvantages

A

-2 types members
1 -constituency with those duties
2- top up votes
-under closed list system (party_- party leadership ranking decides candidates rather than voters
-claim confusing for voters- spoilt ballots higher in scotland and wales
-minority or coalition gov - not as efficient

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Stv
Single transferable vote -proportinal voting system -northern ireland and scotish council elections Ni- broadest representation to reduce tensions if one party -number choices prefertial Less constituencies- 18 in ni More than one rep per party per constituency -candidate needs to achieve quota
26
Stv advantages
Proportional outcome High voter choice- voters can vote for candidates diff parties and prefer between candidates same party Fewer wasted votes No safe seats- no need o tactical vote More representative- multiple mps to talk to within constituency -power struggles in ni- more proportional
27
Stv disadvantages
-complicated- confuses voters- increase spoilt ballots Long time to reach result -voter- rep weaker relatinship -easier extremist parties
28
Choice- fptp
Limited choice 1 mp/constituency 1 mp/party -no choice- safe seat, limited
29
Choice- sv
More choice than fptp as have 1st and 2nd preference
30
Choice0 ams
-gives choice mps and party 1st mp-local 2nd -party chooses mp -more proportiopnal Less wasted votes To vote small party may increase turnout in elections
31
Choice- stv
-may have multiple mps per party Larger constituencies- as many candidates as seats Less wasted botes To vote smaller oarty may increase turnout
32
Fair and representative outcome- fptp
Not either- need most not majority -safe seat -unfiar -high no. Wasted votes
33
Fair and representative outcome- sv
-moderately more representative As long as 50%+ dont need 2nd vote -bit fairer -not proportional
34
Fair and representation outcome- ams
-both -can vote diff parties for mp and party vote -less watsed votes -safe seats less affectibg
35
Stv-fair and representative
Most on both -less wasted votes -safe seats less affectibf
36
Strong-legit gov with clear madate, accountability- fptp and sv
-not clar majority as majoritarian not proprtional -more likely on eparty ruling but not necessarily- has been minoruty or coalition -clear accountablility- one party to blame
37
Ams and stv- Strong-legit gov with clear madate, accountability
-clearer mandate as proportional -strong gov less likely as coalition more likely -no one votes for coalition -more accountable as more likely coalition and diff parties- less clear who to blame
38
Effective mp constituent link- fptp and sv
650 small constitucneis -close link between Surgeries on friday Pmq on behalf
39
Effextive mp constituency link - ams
-have both mp and party vote so strong link -party mps voted diff
40
Effective mp constituent link- stv
-larger constuencys Less close link- travel further for sugeries -bit may have diff party for constituent So be rep by party of choice -email correspondants -no safe seats- worth votiing
41
Example of local referendum
2012 Birmingham and several other cirties Should have democratically elected mayor No 58:42
42
How many referendums since feb 2005
6
43
How many mayoral referendums (to have one) has there been in eng and wales
Over 50
44
Evidence public ARE educated on referendum issues
Issue scottish independance taught formally in all scottish schools
45
Callaghan opinion on referendums
‘Little rubber life raft into which the whole party may one day have to climb’ Agree to disagree
46
2019- the brexit party did not win any seats- how is this unfair?
Recieved 640,000 votes- 2%, yet no seats If in pr would have 13 seats
47
Wasted votes
Votes which do not directly contribute to an mp being elected
48
2019 general election results- proportional?
Con 43.6% vote. 56% seats Lib 11.5% vote 1.5% seats
49
Example how ams works in scotland 2021
Conservatives 5 seats but 23% votes, so had a top up of 26 seats
50
Greens in scotland 2021
0 constituency seats, 8% votes, so recieved 8 seats on regional list seats
51
Example of saafe seat
Bristol west- labour 47,000 votes, 9,000con. -2017
52
Example how winner overrewarded
Alasdair mcdonnell 2015 Sdlp in northern ireland- won with 24.5% votes
53
Examples of marginal seats
2019 Bedford, kensington, bury north
54
Example of extremism with pr
Dutch right wing populist ‘party for freedom’ became 2nd largest party in 2017
55
Impact welsh assemby elections w/ ams
Just 2/5 elections since 2003 have formed majorities 2021- labour minority 2016- labour and lib dem
56
1st national referendum
1975 Eec to eu
57
Scotland devolution election
97 74% yes 26% no Turnouut 60%
58
N ireland- good friday agreement
71% yes 29% no 1998 81% turnout
59
Example when tyrnout for referendum high
81% 1998- good friday agreement 85% scotland 2014 72% 2016- brexit
60
Example election where close
Wales devolution 1997 50.3% yes 49.7% no Turnout 50%
61
Example turnout low
34.6% 1998- london mayor 27.7% 2004- n.e region 50% 1997- welsh assembly
62
Referendum
A vote on a specific issue Q- yes or no answer Tool of irect democracy used w/in representative democracy Called at gov’s discresion Results advisory rather than binding- unlikely to be ignored
63
Electoral commission
Oversee way referendums run Checks wording of referendum q Ensure as objective as possible Checks expendaiture undertaken by officially approved ‘ye’ ‘no’ campaigns organisation
64
Circumstances referendums helf
Decide major constitional change Safegaurd constitutional change Reach a decision when gov party splut Unite nation on v decisive issue As a part of a deal betweem coalition parties
65
Decide major constitutional change- examples
Devolution Scottish independance
66
Safeguaurd a constitutional change
98- good friday agreement Alread agreed but needed ni approval
67
Reach a decision when gov party split
Brexit- hope to unite conservatives
68
Unite nation on v. Decisiove issue
Brexit- 2016 Good friday agreement- 98 Scottish independance- 2014
69
As a part of a deal between coalition partnera
Av 2011 Compromise on pr in lib dem manifesto
70
Evaluate the view that the use of referendums is good for the health of uk democracy
Representation Participation Legitimisation
71
Evaluate the view that the use of referendums is good for the health of uk democracy- intro
Loa- against -a healthy democracy has representation,participation and legitimisation/accountability Referendums always controversial- improve or weaken democracy? Clinch example- brexit- failed in all 3 factors (apart from relatively high turnout)
72
Evaluate the view that the use of referendums is good for the health of uk democracy- representation- for
-form direct democracy- give the people a say on controversial issues- devolution, electoral reform -give direct voice to. The people- outcome, clear representation of people on particular issue Rather than rely on reps in parliament- who may put party before people -allow poplar sovereignty to be expressed directly -check on the power of the executive- 2016 in betweem 2015 and 2017
73
Evaluate the view that the use of referendums is good for the health of uk democracy- against- representation
-bad for representation- threat in representative democracy Looses opportunity for debate and scruitiny Expertise lost- ni protocol needed- nuance lost -challenges parliamentary soverignty- no room for majority -tyranny of the majoirty- no room for negotiation Majority win- forcing their will onto others who ‘suffer’ Less representation- slim majoirity- 50.3% wales
74
Evaluate the view that the use of referendums is good for the health of uk democracy- participation- for
-engagement of public in political process0 another opportunity to vote -hold politicians to accoutnt- between elections -educate and inform- 2016- eu great debate bbc (sadiq khan remain vs boris leave) Informative porgrammes broadcast- 2011 av -turnot can be high- 85% 2014 Encouraging in ‘democratic deficit’ ‘participation crisis’ -participate local issues- over 50 referendums in eng and wales to have elected mayors
75
Evaluate the view that the use of referendums is good for the health of uk democracy- participation- againnst
-‘participation crisis’ sill present - av 42.2%- low turnout -low turnout- reflect public opinion on referendums being less ‘significant’ compared to ge Worsening participation and health of uk. Democracy -misinformation ‘Leave’ ‘we send £350mill to the eu each week, let’s fund our nhs instead’ ‘Remain’ ‘leaving the eu would cost each household 4,300 per year’
76
Evaluate the view that the use of referendums is good for the health of uk democracy- legitimisation- for
-clear outcomes on tricky political q- grants legitimacy to major constitutional change such as devolution Esp important if gov not have strong mandate- harold wilson- eec had 301 minority gov Equally to ‘entrench’ decision- 1998- good friday agreement made- need confirmation on such a divisive issue -electoral commission- oversee referendums independanntly
77
Evaluate the view that the use of referendums is good for the health of uk democracy- legitimisation- against
-despite electoral commission- positively charged words ‘agree’ ‘improve’ more likelyt to have positive outcome- research european referendums -clear answers not the case with slim majority -cant hold ourselves to account- may later realise wrong- but can hold gov to account
78
Example of how cant hold public to account
Brexit Apr 2019- 58% would vote remain
79
Evaluating use of referendums - diff groups
People voting in referendums Votes by mps in parliament Gov decisions- cabinets
80
Evaluating use of referendums- voters- yes
Voice- deciison making- more power- controversial decision needed -access to more info Decision clear
81
Evaluating use of referendums- voters/people- no
Less experienced/education/opportunity to debate Biggger threshold should be required Problems with low turnouut- not represnetative- lack legitimacy Public may be more influenced by social media and fake news- dont have civil service Cant be held to account
82
Evaluating use of referendums- votes by mps in paliamet
More experienced, involved in debates BUT Not representative of votes in safe seats May prioritise parties over constituents- go with party hwhip Filibuster- jrm
83
Evaluating use of referendums- gov decisions - cabinet- yes
More experienced- their full time job- and have civil service Can be held to account
84
Evaluating use of referendums- gov deciisons- cabinet- no
Not in manifesto- eg. Emergency- dont have mandate If dont have mandate- no mandate If large majority- lack scrutiny

4-Politics-Paper 1- Uk Politics And Ideas (9 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2025 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions