13. Eyewitness Testimony: Misleading Information AO1 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What are the two types of misleading information

A
  • Leading questions

- Post event discussion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the response bias explanation

A

Wording of a question has no enduring effect on an eyewitness’s memory of an event, but influences the kind of answer given

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the substitution explanation

A

Wording of a question doesn’t affect eyewitness memory it interferes with its original memory distorting accuracy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Who conducted research into leading questions

A

Loftus and Palmer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How many participants did Loftus and Palmer use

A

45 students

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What was Loftus and Palmer’s procedure

A

Students watched film clip of bar accidents and then answered questions about speed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was the critical question in Loftus and Palmers research

A

About how fast were the cars going when they hit each other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was altered in each part of Loftus and Palmer’s study

A

5 groups - each given different verb in the critical question

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What were the 5 verbs Loftus and Palmer used

A
  • Hit
  • Contacted
  • Bumped
  • Collided
  • Smashed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What did Loftus and Palmer find when using the verb ‘contacted’

A

Mean estimated speed was 31.8mph

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What did Loftus and Palmer find when using the verb ‘smashed’

A

Mean estimated speed was 40.5mph

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What can be concluded from Loftus and Palmer’s research

A

The leading questions biased eyewitness recall of an event - verb ‘smashed’ suggested a faster speed than ‘contacted’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Explain memory contamination

A

When co-witnesses discuss a crime, they mix information from other witnesses with their own memories

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Explain memory conformity

A

Witnesses go along with each other to win social approval or because they believe the other witnesses are right

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Who studied post event discussion

A

Gabbert et al

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What was Gabbert et al’s procedure

A

Paired participants watched a video of same crime - was filmed so each saw elements the others didn’t - they then discussed what they’d seen - individually completed a test of recall after

17
Q

What did Gabbert et al find?

A

71% of participants mistakenly recalled aspects of event the other had seen - picked it up in PED

18
Q

What extra measure did Gabbert take and what did he find

A

In a control group - no PED - no errors