Year 12 Mock Flashcards
What does the learning theory believe
Babies are born a blank slate. Food is the basic idea behind attachment.
Who created the learning theory and when
Dollard and Miller (1950)
Operant conditioning in the learning theory
Baby cries and gets fed. The baby continues to cry whenever they want feeding (positive reinforcement)
What is the primary reinforcer and who is secondary reinforcer in the learning theory
Primary reinforcer - milk
Secondary reinforcer - mother
Limitation of the learning theory
Attachment is not solely based off food. Harlow (1958) conducted a study based off rhesus monkeys to investigate if food or comfort was better for attachment. Harlow found attachment was greater when the primary reinforcer offered comfortbality and safety rather than food. This was an animal study however and hard to generalise to human infants.
What does Bowlbys monotropic theory argue
That attachment is innate
1st stage of Bowlby monotropic theory of attachment
Social releasers. Social behaviour elicits caregiving leading to attachment.
2nd stage of Bowlby monotropic theory of attachment
Critical period. Time frame where babies have innate drive to form an attachment
3rd stage of Bowlby monotropic theory of attachment
Monotropy. Infants have 1 special emotional bond. Infants also form many secondary attachments to form a large safety net
Classical conditions for learning theory
Strength of monotropic theory
Emp evidence to show attachment is innate. Meltzoff and Moore found intersectional synchrony at 3 days old. Interaction also synchrony helps form attachment supporting Bowlbys idea of attachment being innate.
Limitation of Bowlbys theory of attachment
Learning theory is counter argument. Learning theory states that babies are born a blank slate and nothing is innate. Learning theory states babies learn through operant and classical conditioning through the motivation of food and hunger
Conformity using research (Asch)
Conducted line study where ppts asked to complete an unambiguous task in a group setting. 37% conformity in his original trials. Asch further investigated 3 main factors affecting conformity. Group size, task difficulty, unanimity. Task difficulty caused the study to be more ambiguous and therefore Asch found higher conformity when the task was harder due to ISI.
Conformity using research (Zimbardo)
Aimed to investigate how people would conform to social roles by simulating a prison environment with guards and prisoners. Arrested 24 ppts and random allocated them to a prisoner or guard. Study length was 2 weeks but lasted 6 days. He found that prisoners became submissive and obedient to the guards and therefore they showed NSI as they desired to fit into their role.
Strength of Zimabrdo research
There is mirrored findings in every day life. Abu Ghraib prison (2003) was a notorious prison in Iraq. The prison was taken by US soldiers. These soldiers had a higher social role then the prisoners and therefore acted brutally to the prisoners. This increases the validity of Zimbardos study as previously criticised for being a simulated environment.