Year 1 micro - market failure Flashcards

1
Q

What are merit goods

A

goods that are under consumed, have positive externalities and consumers fail to recognise the full benefits of consumption

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are demerit goods

A

Goods deemed more harmful to consumers than they realise, often will generate negative externalities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Examples of imperfect information

A
  • Information failure, consumers may be choosing to ignore information, information may not be clear, information may not be present
  • asymmetric information - information is available, but is not shared equally between the two parties
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

examples of demerit goods

A
  • cigarettes
  • alcohol
  • overconsumed and overproduced by free market
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

characteristics of pure public goodd

A
  • non excludable
  • non rival
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

meaning of non excludable and why

A
  • everybody has access to it
  • the benefits of consuming the good cannot be confined to the individual that has paid
  • there is no cost efficient way to price
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

meaning of non rival

A

the quantity available of the good doesn’t diminish upon consumption

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

examples of public goods

A
  • flood defences
  • defences
  • road signs
  • street lights
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what is the free rider problem

A

where individuals have the incentive not to contribute anything at all to the provision of public goods because they will wait for others to contribute , and benefit off that

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

why is the free rider problem bad

A
  • leads to the under provision of public goods in the free market
  • because nobody will want to pay towards the provision of public goods, so there will be no private motive to supply them, no chance of profit
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what are quasi public good

A

a good that sometimes shows the characteristics of a pure public good, but sometimes will show characteristics of a private good

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

examples of quasi public goods

A
  • roads - toll roads, excludable, congestion times diminish quantity available, making it rivalrous
  • beaches - eg if a hotel can own a beach, that makes it excludable. during peak times, it can also be rival
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what are common access resources

A

natural resources over which no private ownership has been established

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

examples of common access resources

A
  • forests, which provide timber and pulp for us to make paper
  • seas , providing us with seafood and minerals
  • air, providing us with o2
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

why isn’t there private ownership of common access resources

A

it would be costly and inefficient to find ways to exclude other producers from accessing the resources

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what is the tragedy of the commons

A

where the private producers will act according to their self interest and unsustainably keep exploiting common access resources, eventually leading to depletion of that resource

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

examples of producers acting by self interest

A
  • profit motive - private producers may keep fishing/cutting down trees if the resources that they get can be used to increase their profit
  • new producers may come and take more resources after old producers stop
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

impacts of resource depletion

A

Economic Costs
- Resource depletion, such as the exhaustion of fossil fuels or minerals, leads to rising extraction costs as resources become harder to access.
- This increases production costs for businesses reliant on these resources.
- Higher prices for goods and services, potentially reducing consumer spending and slowing economic growth.

Reduced Economic Growth
- Depleted resources can limit industrial productivity, especially in resource-dependent economies. This may reduce GDP growth and weaken long-term economic prospects.
- Hampers development and lowers living standards in affected regions.

Environmental Degradation
- Overextraction often damages ecosystems, causing biodiversity loss, deforestation, or water pollution. Depleted natural environments reduce the planet’s ability to regenerate resources.
- Long-term harm to the environment undermines sustainable development and increases costs for environmental restoration.

Energy Scarcity
- Depletion of energy resources like oil and gas can cause energy shortages and price volatility, especially in economies heavily reliant on these sources.
- Creates uncertainty for businesses and households, increasing costs and reducing disposable income.

Social Inequality
- Resource depletion can disproportionately affect low-income populations, as they often rely on natural resources for livelihoods, such as farming or fishing.
- Worsens poverty and income inequality, particularly in developing countries.

Trade Imbalances
- Resource depletion in a country may force it to import essential materials, increasing dependency on foreign markets and creating trade deficits.
- Weakens the balance of payments, potentially leading to currency depreciation and economic instability.

Risk to Future Generations
- Unsustainable resource use depletes reserves that future generations would rely on, reducing their ability to meet economic and social needs.
- Undermines intergenerational equity and sustainability, limiting long-term global development prospects

19
Q

what is government failure

A

when government intervention leads to a misallocation of scarce resources, harming social welfare

20
Q

what is government failure an argument for

A

not having any government intervention, even if there is a market failure

21
Q

Causes of government failure - Information failure

A
  • Governments often lack complete or accurate information when implementing policies.
  • For example, a policy designed to reduce unemployment may overestimate the demand for labor, leading to overspending on ineffective training programs.
  • Misallocation of resources can occur, reducing the effectiveness of the policy and potentially worsening the issue it was meant to solve.
22
Q

Causes of government failure - costs

A
  • High administrative, enforcement, or implementation costs can outweigh the benefits of a policy.
  • For example, subsidies for renewable energy projects might involve significant financial support and administrative overheads.
  • These high costs can strain government budgets, leading to reduced funding for other essential areas such as healthcare or education, (high opp cost)
23
Q

Causes of government failure - unintended consequences

A
  • black markets
  • negative impacts on people not part of the policy, eg regressive taxes/min price
  • impact on firms, overstrict regulation on tax, may shut down, leading to unemployment
  • firms may become dependent/ wasteful on their subsidies (x inefficiency)
  • state provision could lead to excess demand
  • Policies can have unexpected side effects. - For instance, imposing rent controls to make housing affordable may discourage landlords from maintaining or investing in properties, leading to a decline in housing quality.
  • The original problem (e.g., affordable housing) might not only persist but also worsen, leading to further intervention and inefficiencies.
24
Q

causes of government failure - regulatory capture

A
  • Regulators may become influenced by the industries they are supposed to oversee, prioritizing the interests of firms over the public.
  • For instance, energy regulators might approve price increases that disproportionately benefit providers.
  • Regulatory capture distorts policy objectives, leading to inefficiencies, reduced consumer welfare, and potentially higher prices.
  • when governments try to regulate monopoly power
    • occurs when the interests of society are overlooked for the interest of CEOS
    • so CEOs can influence regulators to reduce the extent of regulation
25
how would an indirect tax solve market failure (negative production externality)
- increases firms cost of production, MPC shifts left to MSC = MPC + tax - price increases and quantity decreases(assuming the tax is perfect)
26
how would an indirect tax solve market failure (consumption)
- we want the MPC = MPB - MPC curve shifts left to MPC + tax - price increases and quantity decreases
27
what is a hypothecated tax
specific taxes introduced for a specific purpose, eg revenue used to advertise
28
cigarette black market value
2 billion per year
29
alcohol black market value uk
1.6 billion
30
When are subsidies used?
When there is an under consumption or production of a good
31
how does a subsidy affect an externality graph
FOR CONSUMPTION - MPB shifts right as cop reduces and will hit MPB at the socially optimum level FOR PRODUCTION - MPC will shift to the right to be equal to MSC , so MSC = MPC + sub - increase in quantity and reduction in price
32
issues with subsidies
1. Opportunity cost of government spending → The government must fund subsidies by diverting resources from other areas (e.g. healthcare or education) → This may reduce public investment in crucial sectors → Which can harm long-term growth and social welfare → Leading to inefficient allocation of public funds 2. Risk of dependency and inefficiency → Firms may become reliant on subsidies to remain profitable → This reduces their incentive to innovate or cut costs → Which can lead to productive inefficiency and X-inefficiency → Weakening international competitiveness in the long run 3. Government failure and poor targeting → Subsidies might be misallocated due to poor information or political motives → This results in resources going to less deserving or inefficient firms → Which distorts market signals and encourages rent-seeking behaviour → Ultimately causing government failure rather than solving market failure 4. Market distortion and reduced competition → Subsidies can give unfair advantages to certain firms or industries → Which may reduce incentives for new firms to enter the market → Leading to lower competition and potential monopolistic tendencies → Which worsens allocative and dynamic efficiency over time 5. Fiscal burden and sustainability issues → Funding subsidies adds pressure to government budgets → This may increase borrowing or require higher taxes in the future → Which can crowd out private investment or reduce disposable income → Undermining long-term macroeconomic stability
33
what is regulation
a rule of law enacted by the government that must be followed by economic agents to encourage a change in behaviour
34
regulation is a non market based approach, what does this mean
it doesn’t work through a market (changing price then changing quantity)
35
examples of command regulation
- age limits - time limits - caps - compulsory regulation eg vaccines - bans
36
example of control regulation
- needs to be enforcement of the regulation, or ppl won’t follow it - needs to be effective punishment to make sure there is an incentive to follow it
37
how regulation helps market failure
- incentive for firms and consumers to change behaviour , to move quantity to socially optimum level - solves issues in free market - to bring about allocative efficiency
38
issues with using regulation
1. Risk of Regulatory Capture When regulatory agencies oversee industries for a long time, firms may develop close relationships with policymakers, leading to regulatory capture. This means that instead of enforcing rules that protect consumers and society, regulators may start making decisions that benefit large corporations. If businesses successfully lobby for weaker regulations or exemptions, industries may become more concentrated, reducing competition. This allows firms to charge higher prices, reduce service quality, or exploit workers, ultimately harming consumers and the economy. 2. Stifling Innovation and Competition Regulations often impose strict rules on businesses, which can act as a barrier to entry for new firms. Startups and smaller firms may struggle to afford the legal compliance costs, while established firms with greater resources can absorb them more easily. This reduces competition in the market, leading to a concentration of power among a few dominant firms. As competition weakens, these firms face less pressure to innovate or improve efficiency, which slows technological progress and long-term economic growth. Over time, consumers experience fewer product choices and higher prices due to reduced market competition. 3. Risk of Unintended Consequences While regulation aims to correct market failures, it can sometimes create new inefficiencies. For example, strict environmental rules may require firms to invest heavily in cleaner technologies, which increases production costs. This can lead businesses to relocate to countries with weaker regulations, resulting in job losses and economic decline in the regulated economy. Similarly, price controls such as rent caps might seem beneficial to consumers, but they discourage property developers from building new homes. Over time, housing shortages emerge, worsening affordability issues and leading to unintended negative consequences.
39
advantages of regulation
Addresses market failure effectively - Regulations can correct market failures by imposing restrictions or standards that ensure optimal resource allocation. For instance, environmental regulations can reduce negative externalities like pollution by setting emissions caps or penalties. - This leads to improved societal welfare, as external costs are reduced, creating a cleaner environment and healthier communities. Provides consumer protection - Regulations ensure safety and fairness, such as product quality standards, food safety checks, or financial regulations that protect consumers from predatory practices. - This builds trust in markets and reduces exploitation, which encourages consumer participation and boosts economic activity. Encourages fair competition - Anti-monopoly regulations prevent firms from abusing market power through predatory pricing or collusion, maintaining a level playing field for smaller businesses. - This fosters innovation, diversity in product offerings, and competitive pricing, ultimately benefiting consumers. Increases Consumer Confidence and Product Safety Regulation ensures that products and services meet specific safety and quality standards, reducing the risk of market failures caused by information asymmetry. For example, food safety regulations, financial industry oversight, and consumer protection laws prevent harmful products from reaching the market. This increases trust in businesses, as consumers feel more confident purchasing goods and services without fear of fraud, dangerous defects, or misleading advertising. As a result, stronger consumer demand and stable markets promote long-term economic growth.
40
what is welfare gain
the excess of social benefit over social cost for a given quantity
41
disadvantages of gas prices rising for firms
1️⃣ Increased Production Costs → Lower Profit Margins Many firms rely on gas as a key input for manufacturing, transportation, and heating. As gas prices rise, the cost of production increases, leading to higher expenses for businesses. Firms may struggle to maintain profitability, especially if they cannot pass the costs onto consumers through price increases. This can result in lower profit margins, reducing firms’ ability to invest in expansion or research & development (R&D). 🔹 2️⃣ Higher Prices → Lower Consumer Demand → Revenue Decline If firms choose to pass higher gas costs onto consumers through higher prices, this can reduce demand for their goods/services. Many consumers have a limited budget, so they may cut back on non-essential spending when prices rise. Lower demand results in declining sales and revenue, especially in price-sensitive markets (e.g., retail, food production). If demand drops significantly, firms may be forced to cut costs elsewhere, such as reducing wages or employment. 🔹 3️⃣ Supply Chain Disruptions → Reduced Productivity Higher gas prices increase transport and logistics costs, affecting firms that rely on shipping, distribution, and supply chains. Rising fuel costs can lead to higher freight and delivery costs, making imported goods more expensive and supply chains less efficient. Some suppliers may raise their own prices, further increasing input costs for firms dependent on raw materials and components. This can lead to delays in production, higher inventory costs, and lower overall productivity. 🔹 4️⃣ Inflationary Pressures → Increased Wage Demands → Wage-Cost Spiral Rising gas prices contribute to higher inflation, increasing the overall cost of living for workers. Employees may demand higher wages to compensate for rising expenses, increasing firms’ labor costs. If firms agree to wage increases, this raises their total costs, potentially leading to further price hikes for consumers. This can create a wage-cost spiral, where rising wages and prices continuously feed into each other, worsening inflation. 🔹 5️⃣ Risk of Business Closures → Unemployment and Market Uncertainty Smaller firms, particularly those with low profit margins, may be unable to absorb the higher costs of rising gas prices. If firms cannot sustain operations, they may be forced to cut jobs or shut down entirely, leading to higher unemployment. Widespread business closures can have negative spillover effects on the economy, reducing economic confidence and investment levels. This can also lead to a decline in market competition, allowing larger firms to gain market power and potentially raise prices further. increased demand for cleaner energy : as they make fossil fuel alternatives more expensive and renewable energy sources become more competitive When gas prices rise, the cost of electricity from fossil fuels increases, making renewable energy sources like solar and wind more attractive and competitive Higher gas prices can lead to increased demand for renewable energy, as consumers and businesses seek cheaper alternatives to power their operations
42
advantages of rising gas prices for firms
1️⃣ Higher Revenues for Energy Companies → Increased Investment Firms in the oil and gas industry (e.g., gas producers, refiners, and energy suppliers) benefit directly from higher prices. As gas prices increase, these firms experience higher revenue and profit margins, allowing for greater investment in exploration, production, and infrastructure. Increased investment can lead to technological advancements and efficiency improvements, benefiting the industry in the long run. Higher profits can also increase shareholder returns, boosting investor confidence in the sector. 🔹 2️⃣ Incentive for Energy Efficiency → Lower Long-Term Costs Rising gas prices encourage firms to adopt energy-efficient technologies, reducing their dependency on fossil fuels. Firms may invest in renewable energy sources, such as solar, wind, or geothermal, leading to long-term cost savings. Improved energy efficiency can also lower operating costs in the future, making firms more competitive and less vulnerable to energy price volatility. Over time, this can enhance sustainability, reduce carbon emissions, and align businesses with environmental goals and regulations. 🔹 3️⃣ Growth Opportunities for Alternative Energy and Green Tech Firms High gas prices increase the demand for alternatives, benefiting firms in the renewable energy, electric vehicle (EV), and battery storage industries. Companies producing solar panels, wind turbines, hydrogen fuel cells, or EV charging infrastructure experience increased investment and sales. As demand shifts towards greener energy solutions, firms in these industries can expand, creating new market opportunities. Governments may introduce subsidies and incentives to accelerate this transition, further benefiting firms in the clean energy sector. 🔹 4️⃣ Competitive Advantage for Firms with Energy-Efficient Supply Chains Firms that already operate with lower energy costs (e.g., those using energy-efficient production methods) gain a cost advantage over competitors. Businesses that have invested in sustainable practices experience less impact from rising gas prices, making them more attractive to cost-conscious consumers and investors. This can lead to greater market share, improved brand reputation, and stronger customer loyalty. Over time, competitors may be forced to follow suit, driving industry-wide improvements in efficiency and innovation. 🔹 5️⃣ Potential Increase in Demand for Domestic Goods and Services If gas prices increase significantly, it becomes more expensive to import goods due to higher transportation and freight costs. This can create an opportunity for domestic producers, as firms and consumers may substitute imports with locally produced alternatives. Increased demand for domestic goods can stimulate local industries, create jobs, and boost economic activity in certain sectors. Governments may also implement policies supporting domestic industries, such as tax incentives or subsidies, to reduce reliance on imports.
43
evaluation points for rising energy costs
1️⃣ Impact Depends on the Industry Energy producers and renewable energy firms benefit, while energy-intensive industries (e.g., manufacturing, transportation, agriculture) suffer from higher costs. The overall effect on firms depends on their energy dependency and ability to pass on costs to consumers. If demand is inelastic, firms may successfully raise prices; if demand is elastic, firms may lose customers, reducing revenues. 🔹 2️⃣ Short-Run vs Long-Run Effects Short run: Higher gas prices cause an immediate cost shock, increasing production costs and inflationary pressures. Long run: Firms may adapt by investing in energy efficiency and renewables, reducing dependence on fossil fuels. If high gas prices persist, firms that fail to innovate may lose competitiveness, while others may gain a strategic advantage. 🔹 3️⃣ Role of Government Policy and Regulation Governments may intervene through price caps, fuel subsidies, or tax breaks to help businesses cope with rising costs. Increased gas prices could lead to greater incentives for green energy investment if governments provide subsidies for renewables. However, excessive intervention (e.g., subsidies for fossil fuels) may delay the transition to sustainable alternatives. 🔹 4️⃣ Global Economic Conditions and Supply Chains If gas prices rise due to global factors (e.g., conflicts, supply chain disruptions), firms may have little control over their exposure to these costs. Countries that rely on gas imports will experience higher inflation and trade deficits, worsening economic conditions. If alternative energy sources are not widely available, firms may struggle to reduce costs quickly, leading to lower investment and slower growth. 🔹 5️⃣ Consumer and Business Confidence High energy prices may lead to lower disposable income, reducing consumer demand for goods and services. If firms expect gas prices to remain high, they may delay investment and hiring, slowing down economic growth. However, if firms see an opportunity (e.g., shifting to renewables), investment may increase in sectors that benefit from the transition.