Wittgenstien and Tolstoy: Thomas 1997 Flashcards
because religious belief does not relate to any empirical entity or person then the belief element in it is conceived of as…
directed to some trans-empirical or metaphysical realm
we can best appreciate their shared conception in terms of what I shall call
an ‘authentic orientation to the world’
I shall look at the similarity in the structure of the model
of authentic religious belief which both shared
the Absoluteness- Element in Wittgenstein is the idea that…
ethics and religious belief involve that which is an absolute
in his ‘Lecture on Ethics’ Wittgenstein distinguish between
an absolute and a relative judgement of value
when we make a relative judgement of value we assess something’s
fitness relative to some further end
example of a chair
a chair is good if it fits a certain predetermined purpose
an absolute judgement of value implies
no further reference to anything at all
what is something absolute?
it is itself an end, one which admits of nothing further
it is a consequence of the myriad of acting that
language emerges in the way it does
we are not neutral contemplators of an external world of discrete elements
unaffected by our viewing of them
the world for us is mediated in and through our
categorisations which in turn are derivative from and moulded by our action in the world
what is particular about ethical and religious reactions?
that they cannot be captures in a paradigm involving observer- neutral contemplation of the world
what do religious beliefs contribute to?
they determine the configuration of the believers world
Wittgenstein’s notion of absolute value relates to the reactions of
the particular human subject- his or her orientation to the world- rather than an objective grounding in reality that supports it
religious belief as a picture is, for Wittgenstein,
something the self subjects itself to, to the extent that everything is coloured by it
religious belief developed by Wittgenstein…
it ‘carries’ a sense of what is valuable that determines the value and regales the individual’s assessment of everything else
the absolute and endurance for Wittgenstein
a type of endurance which puts aside all sense of personal benefits.
what is religious and ethical response devoid of for Wittgenstein?
self- congratulation
Wittgenstein is averse to any idea that something can be
an avenue to personal consolation
[Wittgenstein] the religious picture inspires total
relation of the self’s reactions. this means that religious belief determines what a believer takes to be worth while.
[Wittgenstein] the authentic religious orientation has no place for any motivation
separable from what the religious framework sanctifies as permissible
Wittgenstein sees no place for
relative judgements of value in ethics or religion
[Wittgenstein] an ethical stance involves not a kind of intellectual comprehension- something that involves relative value judgements
but an entirely non-verbal, not articulative apprehension of the world as a whole
‘Lecture of Religious belief’ it is something visual- orientating one’s life around a picture-
that is given as the paradigm example to illustrate the nature of religious belief
‘seeing’
expressed as a form of knowledge that is too fundamental to be reflected upon or to be ordinarily subject to deliberative assessment
Genuine religious belief is to be understood along the lines of such a
non-articulative orientation to the world
‘the way you use the word “god” does not show whom you mean-
but rather what you mean”