Wittgenstien and Tolstoy: Thomas 1997 Flashcards

1
Q

because religious belief does not relate to any empirical entity or person then the belief element in it is conceived of as…

A

directed to some trans-empirical or metaphysical realm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

we can best appreciate their shared conception in terms of what I shall call

A

an ‘authentic orientation to the world’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

I shall look at the similarity in the structure of the model

A

of authentic religious belief which both shared

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

the Absoluteness- Element in Wittgenstein is the idea that…

A

ethics and religious belief involve that which is an absolute

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

in his ‘Lecture on Ethics’ Wittgenstein distinguish between

A

an absolute and a relative judgement of value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

when we make a relative judgement of value we assess something’s

A

fitness relative to some further end

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

example of a chair

A

a chair is good if it fits a certain predetermined purpose

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

an absolute judgement of value implies

A

no further reference to anything at all

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what is something absolute?

A

it is itself an end, one which admits of nothing further

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

it is a consequence of the myriad of acting that

A

language emerges in the way it does

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

we are not neutral contemplators of an external world of discrete elements

A

unaffected by our viewing of them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

the world for us is mediated in and through our

A

categorisations which in turn are derivative from and moulded by our action in the world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is particular about ethical and religious reactions?

A

that they cannot be captures in a paradigm involving observer- neutral contemplation of the world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what do religious beliefs contribute to?

A

they determine the configuration of the believers world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Wittgenstein’s notion of absolute value relates to the reactions of

A

the particular human subject- his or her orientation to the world- rather than an objective grounding in reality that supports it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

religious belief as a picture is, for Wittgenstein,

A

something the self subjects itself to, to the extent that everything is coloured by it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

religious belief developed by Wittgenstein…

A

it ‘carries’ a sense of what is valuable that determines the value and regales the individual’s assessment of everything else

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

the absolute and endurance for Wittgenstein

A

a type of endurance which puts aside all sense of personal benefits.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

what is religious and ethical response devoid of for Wittgenstein?

A

self- congratulation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Wittgenstein is averse to any idea that something can be

A

an avenue to personal consolation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

[Wittgenstein] the religious picture inspires total

A

relation of the self’s reactions. this means that religious belief determines what a believer takes to be worth while.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

[Wittgenstein] the authentic religious orientation has no place for any motivation

A

separable from what the religious framework sanctifies as permissible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Wittgenstein sees no place for

A

relative judgements of value in ethics or religion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

[Wittgenstein] an ethical stance involves not a kind of intellectual comprehension- something that involves relative value judgements

A

but an entirely non-verbal, not articulative apprehension of the world as a whole

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

‘Lecture of Religious belief’ it is something visual- orientating one’s life around a picture-

A

that is given as the paradigm example to illustrate the nature of religious belief

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

‘seeing’

A

expressed as a form of knowledge that is too fundamental to be reflected upon or to be ordinarily subject to deliberative assessment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Genuine religious belief is to be understood along the lines of such a

A

non-articulative orientation to the world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

‘the way you use the word “god” does not show whom you mean-

A

but rather what you mean”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

‘what’ [in terms of God]

A

the sense of this ‘what’ shows itself in the course of a person’s life, in his or her reactions, values, actions, hopes and fears

30
Q

For Wittgenstein the genuine ethics-religious response involves the subject being regulated by the

A

absolute value in question: he or she sees the world according to the perspective of that value

31
Q

independence involves a capacity to do the following:

A

(a) accept the finality of death and the non-survival of the self beyond it
(b) accept pointless suffering
(c) accept life as it comes without trying to desperately manipulate its events
(d) accept this world and not hanker for some metaphysical realm transcending it

32
Q

(a) accept the finality of death and the non-survival of the self beyond [Wittgenstein on independence]

A

by this he seems to have meant a desire not to break down in the face of an externally imposed fate which would end his own existence

33
Q

(c) accept life as It comes without trying to desperately manipulate its events [Wittgenstein on independence]

A

it involves the ability to accept the intrusions if fate without them being overly dependent on mitigating that intrusion by trying to manipulate it away

34
Q

what is genuine prayer for Wittgenstein?

A

non-petitionary (makes life meaningful)

35
Q

eternal life ‘belongs to those

A

who live in the present’

36
Q

[Wittgenstein] religious belief is ‘a

A

way of living, or a way of assessing life’

37
Q

why are doctrines useless for Wittgenstein?

A

It is the spirit in which life is lived that is important

38
Q

The difference between the believer and the unbeliever is, in ‘Lecture on Religious Belief’ …

A

a matter of drawing from different pictures rather than about picturing reality

39
Q

Wittgenstein himself refused to worship a God viewed as directing a grand design,

A

a metaphysical world where evil has meaning

40
Q

for Wittgenstein genuine religion is orientated

A

to the present and not to some metaphysical schema

41
Q

what is religion for Tolstoy?

A

it is something that naturally springs from a particular ‘position in the world’

42
Q

how many relationships to the universe is there for Tolstoy?

A

3

43
Q

first of Tolstoy’s relationships to the universe?

A

a person existing in the world for the purpose of attaining the greater possible well being

44
Q

second of Tolstoy’s relations o the universe?

A

‘recognising the meaning of life not in the well being of one individual but in that of the family, tribe, the state of some other aggregate of people’

45
Q

Tolstoy insists that every person has a relationship to the universe and therefore

A

a religion

46
Q

link to relationship to the universe [Tolstoy] and Wittgenstein’s absolute

A

Absoluteness is given to us through the ‘position in the world’ which we occupy. That position is not optional

47
Q

[our position in the universe is not]

A

something we can move to to from through intellectual analysis

48
Q

what is our position in the universe

A

the way we are engaged in the world- and the type of ethical stance which result from this- determines what we take to be absolute

49
Q

connect between Tolstoy and Wittgenstein’s religious ‘picture’

A

the particular relation to the universe that a person is in determines his entire reaction to contingencies

50
Q

similarity about the good only being found to exist in the individual.

A

what has genuine value cannot exist as something socially valuable because people’s self- interest would arise and polite it

51
Q

what would a socially accepted thing become?

A

a means to socially esteem and prestige

52
Q

what is of absolute value must exist within the

A

individual and be mediated through that individual’s relationship to the universe as a whole

53
Q

a believer is never

A

motivated by something

54
Q

for Tolstoy is not talking about a range go options from which the potential believer chooses

A

the most attractive

55
Q

[tolstoy] is talking about someone who comes to a particular relation with the universe,

A

a relation in which the usual worldly standards are seen as exposed and hollow

56
Q

for such an individual there is only one direction he can follow: the stance of an absolute acceptance

A

of the claims deriving from his relation to the world

57
Q

deliverance [is not]…

A

is not a matter of the most acceptable among a set of options set out in terms of a series of propositions

58
Q

deliverance [is]…

A

that absolute response which derives from a particular relation to the world

59
Q

Wittgenstien and Tolstoy on views of relative values

A

only concerned with matters of fact and therefore unable to change a person’s relationship to the world

60
Q

mental effort automatically proceeds to establish the

A

self’s relation to the world

61
Q

no amount of linguistically enshrined analytical mental effort can

A

asses that relation

62
Q

what motivates both’s understanding of religion?

A

the relationship to the whole of life and the consequent alleviation from suffering and meaninglessness that it provides

63
Q

Tolstoy like Wittgenstein, has no place for religion conceived of

A

as a system of beliefs because such a conception is seen thoroughly given to self orientation

64
Q

Tolstoy insists that to try to justify the superiority of one form of relation to the universe to another through reason is

A

an expression of self interest

65
Q

[tolstoy] saw the genuinely religious stance as an unreflective view

A

of the world as a whole

66
Q

[tolstoy on belief systems] involving a form of knowledge to fundamental to be reflected upon or to be

A

subject to deliberative assessment

67
Q

[tolstoy] saw the notion of God as some sort of entity conceived within a belief system as

A

an inherently self-affirming notion

68
Q

[relationship to independence] Tolstoy believed that the peasants possessed a superior knowledge to that of Russian upper classes

A

This was supposedly manifested in the peasants’ ability to live without any concern for the fact that individual life ends in death and total oblivion

69
Q

for Tolstoy, the capacity to accept the self’s finality at death is fundamental sight of the

A

self’s capacity to be independent of the world and to be able to live within it

70
Q

in both Wittgenstein and Tolstoy we find a view of religious belief

A

as characterised by an absoluteness that involves the individual believer having a perspective on life as a whole

71
Q

perspective on life

A

this perspective in turn leads to the believers reaction being one of independence to the world

72
Q
A