Henry 2009 the grey zone Flashcards

1
Q

biographer Betty Jean Lifton informs us that Czerniaków who gave up a visa to Palestine to serve his community, killed himself

A

when he found out he could not exempt Jewish children from deportation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

the contemporary criticism of the corruption of the Warsaw Jewish council and its police was

A

widespread and deeply felt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

the most fierce and unforgiving attacks by jews living in the Warsaw ghetto on the complicity of other jews were directed

A

against the jewish police

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Wladyslaw Szpilman points out that the Jewish police in the Ghetto was made up largely of young men from the prosperous classes of society

A

He stresses his brother Henryk’s moral courage in refusing to join the Jewish policemen

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

here ws a perverted universe where bread was money; water wasn’t drinkable;

A

your number was your name

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

here it was not only useless but harmful to think and try to understand

A

how things happened

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

here too language was Babel, a confusing linguistic

A

cacophony that, unfathomed, could lead to death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

your own language, whatever it was, was no longer adequate to describe your reality

A

and you were unable to learn enough German to understand the constant shouted commands

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

there was a constant struggle against hunger, thirst, fatigue, the deadly cold of the polish winter

A

and the deteriorating physical labour on ones malnourished body

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

if you could not adapt,

A

you would die

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

if you managed to adapt, you could only survive with

A

constant luck

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

psychologically, the prisoners were inundated with

A

shame

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

humiliated at every turn, they were ashamed of their smell, ashamed if not having sufficiently rested

A

ashamed of letting themselves be reduced to their current state, shamed of having survived even to this point, ashamed of having made all of the various moral concessions that made it possible for them to survive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

the Nazi goal was precisely to

A

demolish each individual

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

they ad achieved their goal of making sure the prisoners were

A

‘dead; before they mounted the scaffold

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Levi leaves us with the horrific image of this

A

dead man walking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

given the goal of the Nazi project and the unbearable daily conditions imposed upon the prisoners, it is perhaps not too surprising that the

A

pre-concentration camp ethics of the Jewish community collapsed completely

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

there was no sense of solidarity with

A

one’s companions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Survival of Auschwitz -“man is bound to pursue his own ends

A

by all possible means”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

we can more readily understand the how one can pass from individual self-interest at any cost to

A

complicity with the enemy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

the drowned and the saved uncompromisingly breaks down the absolute distinction between

A

prisoner and oppressor and introduces us to the murky world of Auschwitz

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

generally speaking, one had no allies with whom one might have joined

A

in resistance or simple solidarity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

there were many different levels of existence in the ‘Grey zone’ some only slightly complicit

A

with the Nazis others required total contamination

24
Q

the Kapos were mainly non-Jews, either common criminals or

A

political prisoners

25
Q

Levi was particularly interested in the few fewer Jewish “prominents” (Kapos, cooks night guards) because unlike the non-Jewish prominents who received these offices upon entrance into the camps

A

Jewish prisoners had to plot and struggle hard to gain them

26
Q

always worrying that their hated oppressors would remove them from from power

A

in order to show their worth, they became even more cruel and tyrannical than their non-Jewish cohorts

27
Q

the sonderkommando lived in rigorous isolation, completely

A

segregated from the rest of the Auschwitz population

28
Q

Thirteen such squads, each composed of between

A

700 and 1000 men, succeeded each other in Auschwitz

29
Q

Every new Sonderkommando burned the bodies of the

A

preceding one

30
Q

the SS ‘psychologists’ noticed that recruitment was easier if one drew from

A

among them from among those desperate, disorientated people, exhausted from the journey, bereft of resistance

31
Q

but they were hardly privileged simply because they had enough to eat

A

their task was unendurable; their days closely numbered. they had no other choice but this work or death and could have only hoped that somehow their situation would change before their immanent execution

32
Q

certainly the German plan was to turn the Jews

A

against each other from their entrance into the ghettos to their death in the gas chamber

33
Q

“represented an attempt to shift onto others- specifically, the victims,

A

the burden of guilt”

34
Q

football match between SS and Sonderkommanders

A

nothing could be more emblematic of the ‘grey zone; than this match where the line between victim and oppressor is blurred and prisoners and perpetrators exist on an equal footing

35
Q

the complicity that bothered 0Primo was the fact that he

A

worked a s a chemist I a Nazi Laboratory

36
Q

this collaboration with the Nazis which kept him inside and alive during the winter of 1944-1945 would continue to

A

haunt him even though, according to one of his biographers he “sabotaged production by muddling test tubes and botching samples”

37
Q

Primo knew he did not betray his principles in order to survive

A

he didn’t kill anyone

38
Q

he wanted to survive “not to live and tell, but to live

A

in order to tell”

39
Q

the first of the three lessons I have learned from reading ‘survival’ and ‘drowned’ is to

A

follow Levi’s lead and be a witness to what I have read rather than a judge of those who were complicit

40
Q

if Primo refuses to judge them, on what grounds would we

A

authorise ourselves to do so

41
Q

for Levi, who speaks out often against hasty and facile moral judgements, no one has the

A

right to judge the complicit under the Nazis, certainly not those who have never been to Auschwitz

42
Q

it is simply impossible for us to know what we would have done

A

had we been faced with the same dilemma

43
Q

not to judge the complicit, however,

A

is not to condone what they did

44
Q

regardless of the ‘grey zone’ where they worked and played together, one must maintain an absolute distinction

A

unlike the Nazis who if they refused to be a part of the killing machine, were simply reassigned, the Jews, most specifically the Sonderkommandos, had no other choice if they wanted to live

45
Q

whereas Levi tells us that no human tribune can produce judgement on the sonderkommanders

A

many courts of justice have been able to condemn unambiguously those who carried out the slaughter of the Jews and far more easily those who masterminded the genocide

46
Q

(drowned) “to confuse [the murderers] with their victims

A

is a moral disease or an aesthetic affection or sinister sign of complicity; above all, it is a precious service rendered (intentionally or not) to the negators of truth”

47
Q

by insisting on both the blowing up of crematorium in Auschwitz by the Sonderkommandos and their frenzied attempt to save the life of the young Hungarian girl who survived the gas chamber

A

Levi provides proof that we cannot equate oppressor and complicitous victim

48
Q

The Drowned and the saved where the ‘grey zone’ seems to encompass almost everyone

A

but even in this heavy mist where it is difficult to differentiate between beings, Levi unyieldingly upholds the distinction between oppressor and victim

49
Q

the final lesson I’ve learned form Levi’s work, the one I, above all, hope to retain

A

concerns the responsibility of the reader in the presentation of the drowned and the saved

50
Q

Levi warns us that in “dredging the abyss” where the Sonderkommandos worked, “one is tempted to turn away with a grimace and close ones mind”

A

but this he states is a temptation one must resist”

51
Q

we must then become the

A

tellers of the tale told by Primo

52
Q

our reading is an act of witnessing that must pass form the

A

page to the stage of our lives not only in memory of those who suffered these outrages bit in an effort to prevent their recurrence

53
Q

(drowned) “what could be perpetrated yesterday could be attempted again tomorrow

A

could overwhelm us and our children”

54
Q

our task is therefore to work in the present using Levi’s wisdom to create a world

A

where another Auschwitz would be impossible

55
Q

“the habit of never remaining

A

indifferent individuals’

56
Q

Levi did not believe that the Holocaust was unique in the sense

A

it could only happen once

57
Q
A