Wills & Estates (Essay Only) Flashcards
terms
decedent
someone who has died
terms
testate
decedent dies WITH a will
terms
intestate
decedent dies WITHOUT a will
terms
probate
judicial process for administering and settling a decedent’s estate
terms
intestate succession
default estate plan, developed by legislature, or distributing property when decedent dies intestate
decedent’s actual intent is irrelevant
terms
heirs
individuals entitled to receive property by intestate succession
living people do not have heirs
terms
issue
decedent’s lineal line
descendants
decedent’s kids, their grandkids, etc.
terms
anestors
decedent’s parental line
parents, grandparents, etc.
terms
collaterals
decedent’s relatives through an ancestor
siblings, cousins, aunts, etc.
simultaneous death - what happens?
decedent + heir die at same time
Uniform Probate Code follows Uniform Simultaneous Death Act
if insufficient evidence to determine who died first, property will pass as though each had predeceased the other
heir must be proven by clear and convincing evidence to have survived the decedent by 120 hours
what is needed to take from a decedent?
individual must survive the decedent
but note simultaneous death
calculate surviving spouse’s share
option 1: spouse + shared descendants
surviving spouse gets entire estate (100%)
calculate surviving spouse’s share
option 2: spouse + parent
surviving spouse gets $300k + 75% of remainder of estate
calculate surviving spouse’s share
option 3: spouse + shared descendants + spouse’s kids
surviving spouse gets $225k + 50% remaining property
calculate surviving spouse’s share
option 4: spouse + non-spousal kids
surviving spouse gets $150k + 50% remaining property
calculate surviving spouse’s share
option 5: spouse only (no descendants or parents)
surviving spouse gets 100%
what happens if dependent dies without heirs?
property will escheat to the state
intestacy
who qualifies as an issue
- must be parent/child relationship
- stepparent adoption - creates parent/child relationship, adoption doesn’t prevent adoptee from inheriting from other genetic parent
- if child is conceived before parent dies but born within 280 days of husband’s death, there is rebuttable presumption that child is the husband’s and can inherit (otherwise, they would need to prove parentage)
- Uniform Parentage Act increases to 300 days
calculating the issue’s share
method 1: per stirpes
- divide shares equally according to decedent’s lineal line
- divide shares into total number of kids who survive or leave issue who survive, then divide by representation
- surviving kid can stand in the place of their deceased parent
- issue takes in equal shares regardless of whether anyone in that generation survived
calculating the issue’s share
method 2: per capita with representation
- divide the property equally at first generation where a member survives the decedent
- if deceased members at first generation, their shares drop down to their surviving issue at the next generation
- if deceased member is not survived by living issue, then that member doesn’t take a share
calculating the issue’s share
method 3: per capita at each generation (Uniform Probate Code)
- divide property into equal shares at first generation where there is a surviving member
- pool the remaining shares after each generation –> divide equally at next generation
tip
how to do problems with surviving spouses + decedents
start with surviving spouse first
then do the kids
execution of wills
what are the formal execution requirements for a will
- signed writing
- witnesses
- testamentary intent - present intent to make a testamentary transfer
execution of wills
what is required for the signed writing by testator?
- entire will must be signed by testator
- Uniform Probate Code does NOT allow oral (including video) wills
- some states: signature must be at end of document
- other states (and UPC): signature can be on any part of the doc, important part is whether testator intended their name to be a signature; if signature is not at bottom, any words after signature are not given effect
- capacity: must be 18 years old + of sound mind (measured at time of signing)
- formal signature is not required, must indicate testator’s desire to sign
execution of wills
what is required for attestation (witnesses)
presence
- signed in presence of at least two witnesses
- witnesses must sign the doc (not necessarily at same time)
- most juris: testator must sign or acknowledge the will in presence of witnesses + witnesses must sign in the presence of testator
- UPC: witnesses must sign within a reasonable time of the original signature by testator
- line of sight approach to presence (traditional): witness and testator must observe or have oppy to observe signing of the will (same room)
- conscious presence approach (modern): witness or testator must be aware the act is being performed, even if they can’t see it
interested witnesses (has a direct financial interest in the will)
- common law: interested witnesses are not competent to witness the will
- UPC: abolished this doctrine, just go after problematic witness via undue influence or fraud
- purge theory (many states): direct financial interest does not affect validity of will
- BUT probate court will purge any gain in excess of what the witness would take under intestate succession
- do NOT purge gain IF there were 2 other disinterested witnesses OR interested witness would take share under intestate succession + interested witness takes the lesser to eh intestate share or bequest
execution of wills
what happens if there’s a failure to satisfy the formalities?
- common law (majority): strict compliance with will formation formalities
- modern view (UPC, minority): substantial compliance
- clear and convincing evidence that descendent intended the doc to serve as their will
execution of wills
holographic will
- informal, handwritten will
- does not need witnesses
- must be signed to be valid
- some jurisdictions: any markings not in testator’s handwriting invalidate the will
- UPC: only requires that material provisions are in testator’s handwriting
- look for words or phrases that suggest intent
- UPC expressly authorizes looking to extrinsic evidence to establish intent
words that express intent: “bequeath” “inherit”
tip
person is handwriting something about their property –> what is this a flag for
holographic analysis
focus on intent!
execution of wills
codicils
- supplements (does not replace) a will
- must be executed with same formalities as a will
execution of wills
examples of will substitutes (non-probate transfers)
- joint tenancy - avoids probate b/c right of survivorship
- revocable trust - b/c inter vivos transfer
- pour-over will - b/c distributes property under a trust
- payable on death contract - b/c distributes by inter vivos transfer
- deeds - b/c inter vivos transfer
what happens with beneficiaries of life insurance policies
Essay 1984
- beneficiary of a life insurance policy takes by virtue of the insurance contract
- proceeds are not part of the decedent’s estate, unless they are payable to the estate as beneficiary
- need to change beneficiary via form with insurance company
- some courts have upheld a beneficiary change by will if the insurance company does not object
revocation of a will
timeline to revoke or alter a will
wills can be altered or revoked at any time up until testator’s death (ambulatory will)
can be revoked in full or part
revocation of a will
ways to revoke a will
- subsequent instrument
- physical act
- operation of law
revocation of a will
subsequent instrument
express revocation
later writing expressly revokes a prior will
implied revocation (inconsistency)
later writing is inconsistent with prior will
so long as it is validly executed, later will controls
tip
distinguish between codicil vs. new will
look at residuary gift
original will has residuary gift + later writing does not –> later writing is probs a codicil
original will does NOT have a residuary gift + later writing does –> later writing is probs a will
revocation of a will
physical act
testator may revoke a will be engaging in a physical act of destruction (tearing, burning, crossing stuff out)
must intend for physical act to revoke the will
destroying specific language
- majority: particular language in question must be destroyed
- UPC: only requires that destructive act affect some part of the will
lost wills (lost at time of testator’s death)
- creates a rebuttable presumption that testator revoked will by physical act
- burden is on proponent to show will’s existence by clear and convincing evidence
- duplicate originals can be admitted, but not copies
revocation of a will
operation of law
what happens to a will if there’s divorce
- most jurisdictions: divorce revokes all will provisions in favor of the former spouse
- EXCEPT if there is evidence that testator wanted will to survive
- UPC also invalidates gifts to ex’s relatives
- subsequent marriage does not revoke a will
revocation of a will
3p revocation
3p can revoke on behalf of a tester IF
1. at testator’s direction AND
2. in testator’s conscious presence (phone call isn’t enough)
revocation of a will
revoking codicils
by revoking a will, testator also revokes any codicil attached to the will
BUT if revoke a codicil, the underlying will is revived in its original form
revocation of a will
revival of a will
- UPC (majority) does not recognize automatic revival of a revoked will
- Dependent Relative Revocation - safety valve for testators who revoke a will based on a mistake, mistake can be grounded in law or fact
- DRR invalidates the mistaken revocation and revives the earlier revoked will
tip
revocation based on a mistake –> what analysis should I do?
buzzwords: revocation, mistake, causation, safety valve
Dependent Relative Revocation (DRR)
focus on the idea that but for the mistake, testator would not have revoked the first will
interpretation (construction) of wills
plain meaning doctrine
courts give words in will their plain meaning
except: will states otherwise (defined terms)
interpretation (construction) of wills
incorporation by reference (will refers to a document outside the will itself that doesn’t meet testamentary formalities)
other writing must meet three requirements:
1. it existed at the time the will was executed (UPC waives if doc disposes only of personal property)
2. the testator intended the writing to be incorporated into the will
AND
3. the writing is described in the will with sufficient certainty so as to permit its identification
interpretation (construction) of wills
acts of independent significance
testator can dispose of property based on some act or event that is unrelated to the execution of the will
applies to acts in the future (after execution of the will)
interpretation (construction) of wills
lapse and anti-lapse statute
also covered in Real Property, but less detail
- common law: testamentary gift would lapse (fail) if an intended beneficiary didn’t survive testator, failed gifts would be dumped into residuary gift
- anti-lapse statutes provide an alternative disposition for lapsed gifts, prevents certain gifts from lapsing
- (1) protected relationship (intended for relative) + (2) survived by issue –> issue gets the gift
- if elements not met, common law rule applies (gift goes to residuary)
interpretation (construction) of wills
class gifts + lapses
- common law: if a member’s gift lapses, rest of class share that member’s gift
- if lapsed member is covered by anti-lapse statue, that rule controls
- not covered by anti-lapse statute, rest of class members are that member’s gift
interpretation (construction) of wills
abatement (including hierarchy)
if estate doesn’t have sufficient funds to pay debts or make gifts, gifts will be abated in a specific order
ARGS
1. asset property
2. residuary gift - left over
3. general gifts - gift of property satisfied from general assets of estate (like $ generally)
4. specific gifts (last to be reduced, most protection) - gift of a particular piece of property
demonstrative gift - gift from a particular source (like money from BAC account)
if demonstrative gift can be satisfied, treated as specific gifts; otherwise, treated as general gifts
interpretation (construction) of wills
ademption by extinction
- will makes specific devise of property, but the property is no longer in the estate
- traditional rule (identity theory): device is extinct, devisee takes nothing
- UPC (intent theory): look at testator’s intent at time they disposed of property, look for facts that suggest the testator intended the ademption, trying to avoid ademption
interpretation (construction) of wills
ademption by satisfaction
- testator satisfies a specific or demonstrative gift (in whole or part) via inter vivos transfer
- (1) testator must have intended for the gift to deem + (2) intent must be supported by a writing
ambiguities in a will - how do you deal with them?
- latent ambiguity - can’t see the problem on the face of the will, need context
- patent ambiguity - problem appears on the face of the document
rules:
- traditional rule: patent ambiguities have to be resolved w/o looking at extrinsic evidence, can use extrinsic evidence for latent ambiguities
- modern rule (majority): both ambiguities can be resolved with extrinsic evidence
mistakes in a will - how do cts deal with them?
courts aren’t very forgiving
limits on power to transfer
rights of surviving spouse
elective share
- surviving spouse can elect to take a forced share (they get their share first so it reduced the gifts to other beneficiaries)
- UPC: forced share is 50% of decedent’s augmented estate
- augmented estate (UPC) = property acquired before + during marriage (vs. community property share - during only)
waiver
- can waive right to elective share IF
- (1) waiver in writing after a fair discourse of its contents AND (2) spouse is represented by independent legal counsel
surviving spouse has lots of means of support
- social security + pensions
- homestead exemption (keep the house)
- personal property set asides
- family allowance for reasonable living expenses during probate
- elective share
limits on power to transfer
gifts to testator’s children - advancements
advancements - lifetime gift to kid that is treated as satisfying all/part of kid’s intestate share
common law
any lifetime gift is presumed to be an advancement
child has burden to show it was an outright gift
hotchpot analysis
add value of advancements back into intestate estate
divide resulting estate by number of children taking
deduct child’s advancement from their interstate share
UPC
gift is advancement only if
(1) decedent declared in a contemporaneous writing that gift was an advancement OR
(2) writing indicates gift should be taken into account in computing the division of property of decedent’s estate
limits on power to transfer
gifts to testator’s children - omitted children
- intentional disinheritance - allowed (ofc)
- unintentional disinheritance (like forgetting to update your will when you have another kid)
- if testator had no other children when will was executed, omitted child takes their intestate share
- if tester had at least one child at execution + will devised property to at least one child, then omitted child takes equal share from portion of property already devised to the other child
limits on power to transfer
bars to succession: slayer statutes
- beneficiary who murders the decedent is barred from taking under decedent’s will
- murderer is treated as if they predeceased the testator
- only murder-murder, not involuntary manslaughter or self defense
- UPC allows killer’s issue to take when relevant
sidenote (not part of slayer statute): someone convinced of financial exploitation, abuse, or neglect of a person under their care (like elder abuse) is prohibited from inheriting from that person
limits on power to transfer
bars to succession: disclaimer
person may disclaim a testamentary gift (probs b/c taxes)
disclaimer must be
(1a) in writing, signed, filed with court OR
(1b) declared to the person in charge of distributing the estate
AND
(2) identify the decedent, describe the interest being disclaimed, and define the extent of the disclaimer
must disclaim within 9 months of death
limits on power to transfer
categories
limits on testator’s ability to transfer property
- rights of testator’s spouse
- gifts to testator’s children
- bars to succession: slayer statutes + disclaimer
tip
difference between ademption by satisfaction and advancements
ademption by satisfaction is for testate
advancements deal with intestate succession
will contests
general info about will contests
- objections the validity of a will
- only an interested party has standing to challenge
- interested party: (1) receive a financial benefit under the will OR (2) take under intestate succession but not under the will
- interested party must file a contest claim within 6 months after will is admitted to probate
will contests / testamentary capacity
general testamentary capacity
- when: person challenging the will (contestant) bears burden of providing the testator lacked the requisite mental capacity at time of execution of the will
whether testator had ability to know (NOT actual knowledge)
- why: nature of the act
- what: nature and character of their property
- who: natural objects of their bounty (like their kids)
- how: plan of the attempted disposition
will contests / testamentary capacity
insane delusion
- false belief to which testator adheres in spite of all reason and evidence to the contrary
- testator has general capacity, but insane delusion as to some belief
- objective test: (1) measure testator’s insane delusion against actions of a rational person in testator’s person and (2) belief is an insane delusion if rational person could not have reached the same conclusion
- causation - insane delusion was a but for cause of the testamentary disposition
ex. testator is convinced spouse is cheating on them (even though no evidence) so will leaves nothing to spouse
will contests
undue influence
- coercive relationship
- contestant alleges that a 3p effectively controlled the testator’s decision making process
contestant bears initial burden of showing
1. beneficiary received a substantial benefit under the will
2. beneficiary had a confidential relationship with the testator (frequently lawyer, doctor, therapist)
AND
3. testator had a weakened intellect at time of execution
if contestant meets burden, there is presumption of undue influence
burden shifts to proponent (3p) to show by a preponderance of evidence that there was no undue influence
beneficiary is treated as if they predeceased testator to the extend that the gift is in excess of beneficiary’s intestate share
causation is v important
like a whisper in the ear
will contests
fraud
contestant bears burden of showing that the beneficiary engaged in an unlawful misrepresentation at time of conveyance
beneficiary made misrepresentation with
1. intent to deceive the testator AND
2. for purpose of influencing the testamentary disposition
- fraud in the inducement
- fraud in the execution
remedy - constructive trust
tip
difference between undue influence and fraud vs. insane delusion
undue influence and fraud require act by 3p
insane delusion is in mind of testator
will contests
forfeiture clauses
- in terrorem - no-contest clause designed to dissuade a beneficiary from suing about their share
- UPC: clause is unenforceable if beneficiary had probable cause to challenge
- so if beneficiary did NOT have probable cause (claim is groundless, the forfeiture clause is enforceable
tip
how to analyze probate question
- ID each piece of property as probate or non-probate
- if non-probate: figure out who takes it
- everything else is probate –> testate or intestate succession
- if there a will? is it valid? who are the intended beneficiaries?
- any property not specifically devised will pass via intestate succession
- if no will, all property goes through intestate succession
probate process
how does non-probate property transfer?
instrument other than a will
examples:
deed
trust
joint tenancy with right of survivorship
payable on death contract
probate process
purpose of probate process
orderly administration of a decedent’s estate
protects and satisfies creditors
quiets contested titles, transfers titles to rightful holder
protects tester’s interest
efficient
remember: only those who stand to benefit financially under a will have standing to contest a will
probate process
filing under UPC
probate proceedings must be brought within 3 years of death, then there s a presumption of intestacy
party requesting probate can have it occur through informal (ex party) or formal probate (notice)
probate process
creditors
- non-claim statute prevents a creditor form making a claim on the decedent’s estate after a certain time period has elapsed (barred if not brought within that window)
- personal representative must provide notice to creditors of the state
classes of creditors
1. administrative expenses (most important)
2. medical and funeral expenses
3. family allowances (children and spouses)
4. taxes
5. secured claims
6. judgments against decedent
7. all other claims
probate process
personal representative
- person who acts on behalf of estate during probate process
- if appointed by court - administrator
- if named in will - executor
- fiduciary owing duties of loyalty and care
- cannot engage in self-dealing
- gets paid from the estate
probate process
if no named personal representative in will, who will serve?
in order of priority
- surviving spouse who is devisee
- other surviving devisee
- surviving spouse (if not devisee)
- other heirs of decedent
- any creditor (after 45 days of decedent’s death)
power of appointment
what is power of appointment (generally)
describes ability of decedent (donor) to select an individual (donee) to dispose of certain property under the will
power is personal to the donee (only the donee can appoint)
general and special
power of appointment
general power of appointment
no conditions or restrictions on donee’s power
if donee fails to exercise the power, property reverts back to donor’s estate
power of appointment
special power of appointment
donor can specific certain individuals or groups as objects of the power
donor lists the donee’s power
powers of attorney
what is needed for a power of attorney to be valid
authority to act on another’s behalf in a legal or business matter
principal / agent relationship
- must be in writing
- signed AND
- dated
powers of attorney
types of powers of attorney
general: covers all affairs during a person’s period of incapacitation
special: limits authority to specific subject matters (like resolving a certain deal)
advance health care directives:
* living will - dictates care individual wants in teh event they cannot make those wishes known, agent needs to make sure directive is enforced
* durable POA for health care - appoints agent in event principal becomes incapacitated and is unable to make medical decisions, allows agent to stand in principal’s shoes and make decisions for them
community property rules
don’t apply unless exam question says to
surviving spouse is entitled to 100% of community property
tip
witnesses - presence requirement
make sure to discuss both majority view and UPC view
tip
codicils
explain how codicil is changing the terms of original will + whether codicil was executed property
what laws are used to determine the validity of a will?
Essay 5315
- common law: state where the testator was domiciled at the time of his death
- UPC: validity is determined under the law of the place where (i) the will was executed OR (ii) the testator is domiciled, has a place of abode, or is a national at the time of death.
can a will be conditioned on an event?
Essay 5315
yes, validity of a will can be conditional on a particular event or circumstance
ct will try to construe express language as a mere explanation or instruction, rather than stopping admittance of the will
ct will consider whether the event is an express condition or only a statement of motive for executing the will
distribution of a dividend received b/t will execution and death
Essay Feb 2024
goes to the named beneficiary
if a testator specifically devised securities owned at the time the will was executed to a named beneficiary and subsequently the testator acquired additional shares of the securities as the result of either a stock split or a stock dividend, the additional shares also pass to the
named beneficiary
UPC
is a devised house subject to the mortgage?
Essay Feb 2024
subject to the mortgage, it’s not paid off
specific devise passes subject to any mortgage
interest existing at the date of death without right of exoneration, regardless of a general directive in the will to pay debts
UPC
proceeds of casualty or fire insurance
Essay Feb 2024
specific devisee is entitled to the specifically devised property
if it is in the probate estate AND any proceeds unpaid at death on fire or casualty insurance on the property
rule statement queen!
whether the will was republished by codicil
Essay 2610
A valid will must be in writing and signed with present testamentary intent by the testator in the joint presence of two witnesses.
A codicil is a supplement to a will that alters, amends, or modifies it. A codicil must be executed with the same formalities as a will, but it need not be executed with the same formalities as the will that it alters, amends, or modifies.
A valid partial will, or codicil, that refers to an earlier will is said to republish that will as of the date of the codicil.
A validly executed codicil may validate an invalid will if the codicil refers to the will with sufficient certainty to identify and incorporate it, or if the codicil is on the same paper as the invalid will.
rule statement queen!
whether the will was incorporated by reference
Essay 2610
A will may incorporate by reference another writing provided the other writing existed at the time the will was executed, is intended to be incorporated, and is described in the will with sufficient certainty so as to permit its identification.
rule statement queen!
who counts as an heir under the laws of intestacy
Essay 2610
Intestacy is the default statutory distribution scheme that applies when an individual dies without effectively disposing of all of his property by other means.
Intestacy statutes generally favor the decedent’s surviving spouse and issue, followed by the decedent’s other relations. A party cannot take property from a decedent when the party was responsible for the decedent’s death.
Although murderers are often barred from inheriting under a “slayer statute,” this does not apply if an heir killed another person, even if the heir’s victim left property to the decedent that is included in the decedent’s estate.
rule statement queen!
whether the doctrine of ademption prevents person from receiving the succeeding home
Essay 2610
A specific bequest is a gift of property that can be distinguished with reasonable accuracy from other property that is part of the testator’s estate.
If the subject matter of a specific bequest is missing or destroyed (“extinct”), the beneficiary takes nothing. The property is adeemed regardless of the testator’s intent.
However, under the UPC, the bequest is adeemed only if the facts and circumstances establish that ademption was intended.
The UPC permits a beneficiary of a specific extinct gift to take the property acquired by the testator as replacement property.
Under the common law doctrine, the testator’s intentions are
irrelevant; all that matters is whether the testator owned the specifically devised asset at his death.
rule statement queen!
number of shares of common stock they receive + do they get the dividends too
Essay 2610
At common law, a stock dividend is a property interest distinct from stock given by a specific bequest.
Under common law, a bequest of stock owned by a testator when the testator’s will is signed excludes subsequently acquired shares of the same stock.
A bequest of a certain number of shares is deemed to include any additional shares of that security acquired by reason of a stock split, reinvestment, or merger initiated by the original security.
However, the beneficiary is not entitled to any pre-death cash dividends or distributions.
Today, virtually all jurisdictions treat stock splits and dividends the same way; in each case, additional shares obtained by the testator go to the specific devisee.
rule statement queen!
whether a handwritten will complies with state law for a validly executed will
Essay 1984
A holographic will is in a testator’s handwriting, signed by the testator, and need not be witnessed.
Under the state’s law [provided in this question], holographic wills and codicils are not recognized. To be valid, a will must be acknowledged by the testator and signed in the presence of at least two attesting witnesses, who also sign the will within 30 days.
rule statement queen!
whether testators can change life insurance beneficiary via will
Essay 1984
A beneficiary of a life insurance policy takes by virtue of the insurance contract.
The proceeds are not part of the decedent’s estate, unless they are payable to the estate as beneficiary.
Life insurance policies typically provide that proceeds will only be paid to a beneficiary named on an appropriate form filed with the insurance company; other possible methods of changing a beneficiary are thus viewed as being excluded by the insurance contract.
However, some courts have upheld a beneficiary change by will if the insurance company does not object.
rule statement queen!
whether the memo is incorporated by reference into the will
Essay 1984
A will may incorporate by reference another writing not executed with testamentary formalities, provided the other writing meets three requirements:
(i) it existed at the time the will was executed;
(ii) the testator intended the writing to be incorporated; and
(iii) the writing is described in the will with sufficient certainty so as to permit its identification.
rule statement queen!
whether the gift lapsed
Essay 1984
Under common law, if a beneficiary died before the testator or before a point in time by which he was required to survive under the will, the gift failed and went to the residue unless the will provided for an alternate disposition.
Today, almost all states have anti-lapse statutes that provide for the alternate disposition of lapsed gifts.
Under the majority of the statutes, if the gift was made to a relation of the testator within a specific statutory degree, and the relation predeceased the testator but left issue, then the issue succeeds to the gift, unless the will expressly states the contrary.
rule statement queen!
order in which the bequests will abate
Essay 1984
Gifts by will are abated, i.e., reduced, when the assets of the estate are insufficient to pay all debts and legacies.
If not otherwise specified in the will, gifts are abated in the following order:
(i) intestate property;
(ii) residuary bequests;
(iii) general bequests; and then
(iv) specific bequests.
Abatement within each category is pro rata.
rule statement queen!
whether state anti-lapse statute or anti-lapse clause in will governs
Essay 5664
Under common law, if a beneficiary died before the testator, then the gift failed and went to the residue unless the will provided for an alternate disposition.
Almost all states have enacted anti-lapse statutes providing for alternate disposition of lapsed bequests.
Under the majority of the statutes, if the gift was made to a relation of the testator within a specific statutory degree, and the relation predeceased the testator but left issue, then the issue succeeds to the gift, unless the will expressly states the contrary.
rule statement queen!
whether property goes to the heir (would have received if died intestate) or a charity (received entire estate b/c died testate)
Essay 5664
The individuals who are entitled to a decedent’s property if he dies intestate are the decedent’s “heirs.”
Because the will did not condition Doris’s bequest upon her surviving the testator, the bequest does not fail just because Doris predeceased the testator.
[applied the relevant clause of the will –> passes to Doris’s heirs so it doesn’t go to the charity (not an heir)]
rule statement queen!
whether residuary bequest lapses b/c of express survivorship requirement in will
Essay 5664
If an heir of a decedent fails to meet the survival requirement, then the heir is considered to have predeceased the decedent and does not take under the laws of intestacy.
The clause is similar to the state anti-lapse statute, and the fact that the testator uses the phrase “if [he/she] survives me” demonstrates that the testator intentionally distinguished gifts that were subject to survivorship.
HOWEVER, the UPC takes a contrary approach with respect to the effect of the phrase “if he [or she] survives me.”
It provides that an express survivorship contingency does not evidence intent for the anti-lapse statute to be inapplicable.
rule statement queen!
who is entitled to their share if bequest to specific person lapses
Essay 5664
Under the UPC, if the residue is left to two or more persons and one dies, and if anti-lapse does not apply, then the remaining beneficiaries take in their proportionate shares.
This is contrary to the common-law “no residue of a residue” rule, under which the testator’s heirs succeeded to any lapsed portion of a residual bequest.
rule statement queen!
who is entitled to their share if bequest to specific person does not lapse
Essay 5664
If a gift does not lapse, then it passes to the predeceased person’s heir.
republication by codicil doctrine
Essay July 2017
defects in a prev validly executed will can be cured if the will is “republished” in a properly executed codicil
treats portions of the original valid will that are not inconsistent with the terms of the codicil as recited in codicil
