Civ Pro Flashcards
jurisdiction / intro
what are the types of jurisdiction?
- SMJ - power of ct to decide this type of case
- PJ - power of ct to decide the rights and liabilities of this D
- Venue - which districts have proper venue (among cts with SMJ + PJ)
SMJ
what is the issue in SMJ?
does this court have the power to decide this kind of case?
SMJ
what is the SMJ of federal courts?
limited SMJ
can only hear certain claims
SMJ
what is the SMJ of state courts?
courts of general + unlimited SMJ
for MBE, assume state cts have SMJ over any kind of case unless info to contrary
SMJ
how do you plead federal SMJ?
must be affirmatively pleaded in every case
if challenged, must prove there is a basis for SMJ
SMJ
who can raise lack of SMJ?
any party at any time
including during appeal and the court itself
SMJ
can the parties waive SMJ?
nope, can’t be waived by failing to object or by affirmative consent
SMJ
what are the two types of SMJ?
- federal question jurisdiction
- diversity jurisdiction
SMJ / Federal Question
what is the basis for Federal Question Jurisdiction?
- exists for a claim that arises under federal law
- P’s claim must be based on federal law
- look at the P’s claims in their well-pleaded complaint when determining
- only P’s original claims, not anticipated responses to a defense
SMJ / Diversity Jurisdiction
what is required for diversity jurisdiction?
- cases b/t citizens of different states OR state + foreign country
AND - amount in controversy > $75k (not equal to), elusive of interest and costs
SMJ / Diversity Jurisdiction
what type of actions must always be brought in state court not federal?
- probate
- domestic relations
SMJ / Diversity Jurisdiction
what is the relevant timing for determining diversity jurisdiction?
must exist when the complaint is filed
SMJ / Diversity Jurisdiction / citizenship
what is the general rule for Complete Diversity?
- complete diversity is required
- every citizenship represented on P’s side must be different from every citizenship represented on D’s side
SMJ / Diversity Jurisdiction / citizenship
what is Minimal Diversity (exception to Complete Diversity Requirement)?
exists when any P is diverse from any D, even if other P and D overlap
allowed in these situations
- Federal Interpleader Act
- Class actions with at least 100 class members and claims over $5mm (Class Action Fairness Act)
- interstate mass torts if 75+ natural persons died in one account
if one of these situations doesn’t apply, then Complete Diversity is required
SMJ / Diversity Jurisdiction / citizenship
how do you determine citizenship for individuals?
citizen of the state or country of domicile
domicile = permanent residence (reside + intent to remain indefinitely)
only one legal domicile
SMJ / Diversity Jurisdiction / citizenship
how do you determine citizenship for representative parties?
citizenship of representative party controls
exception: decedent’s estate - citizenship of decedent applies
exception: guardianship of minor / incompetent person - citizenship of minor / incompetent person applies
SMJ / Diversity Jurisdiction / citizenship
how do you determine citizenship for class actions?
citizenship of named or representative parties counts
SMJ / Diversity Jurisdiction / citizenship
how do you determine citizenship for a corporation?
- can have several citizenships
- state(s) or foreign country where incorporated
- state / country of nerve center (principal place of business, C-Suite)
SMJ / Diversity Jurisdiction / citizenship
how do you determine citizenship for a partnership or unincorporated association?
partnership, limited partnership, trade associations, unions, LLC
citizen of every state of which its members are citizens
SMJ / Diversity Jurisdiction / citizenship
are actions that create or destroy diversity permitted?
permitted as long as they are not shams or fraudulent
like moving or assigning a claim
SMJ / Diversity Jurisdiction / amount in controversy
what is the basic requirement / rule for amount in controversy?
- must exceed $75k exclusive of interest and costs
- only relevant in diversity cases
- any good faith allegation will suffice
SMJ / Diversity Jurisdiction / amount in controversy
what does aggregation mean?
add up smaller claims to exceed the $75k threshold
also think about supplemental jurisdiction
SMJ / Diversity Jurisdiction / amount in controversy
can you aggregate claims if there is one P and one D?
yep, P can aggregate all of her claims regardless of whether the claims are related
SMJ / Diversity Jurisdiction / amount in controversy
can you aggregate claims if there is one P and multiple D?
P may not aggregate claims
claims against each D must meet $75k
SMJ / Diversity Jurisdiction / amount in controversy
can you aggregate claims if there are multiple P and one D?
P may not aggregate claims
each P must seek $75k+ from D
SMJ / Removal Jurisdiction
what is removal?
moves case from state court to federal court
SMJ / Removal Jurisdiction
what is transfer?
moves case from one federal court to another federal court
SMJ / Removal Jurisdiction
can a case be moved from federal court to state court?
not a thing
fed ct can abstain from hearing it
SMJ / Removal Jurisdiction
what is the general rule for removal?
removal is proper ONLY if the case originally could have been brought in federal court
if the P chose to sue in federal court in the first place, would the fed ct had SMJ?
SMJ / Removal Jurisdiction
who can remove?
only the defendant
ALL D must consent w/in 30 days of service
tip
“was the motion to remove properly granted” –> what is this type of question getting at
SMJ + removal
v sneaky
SMJ / Removal Jurisdiction / Federal Question
what is the rule for removal of federal question cases?
depends on whether the federal question appears on the face of the well-pleaded complaint
if P’s claim is based on federal law, D MAY remove
if P’s claim is based on state law, D may NOT remove to federal court even if D raised a federal defense
SMJ / Removal Jurisdiction / Diversity Cases
when is removal based on diversity jurisdiction allowed?
only if
1. complete diversity
2. amount in controversy
AND
3. action is brought in a state of which no defendant is a citizen
must remove within one year of the commencement of action in state court UNLESS P acted in bad faith
if in D’s home state court, D can’t remove
SMJ / Removal Jurisdiction
if a removal notice is filed, when does the state court’s jurisdiction end?
automatically and immediately
SMJ / Removal Jurisdiction
what happens if P thinks removal is improper? which court decides?
P can file petition for remand in federal court
federal court holds a hearing
if removal is proper –> remand denied, stays in fed ct
if removal is improper –> remand granted, goes back to state court
SMJ / Supplemental Jurisdiction
what is the basic rule for supplemental jurisdiction?
allows a federal court with SMJ over a case to hear additional claims over which the ct would not independently have jurisdiction if ALL the claims constitute the same case or controversy
same case or controversy if arise out of same common nucleus of operative fact, same transaction or occurrence
not required to expand its jurisdiction
SMJ / Supplemental Jurisdiction
what should I think of with supplemental jurisdiction?
additional claims
SMJ / Supplemental Jurisdiction in Federal Question
how does supplemental jurisdiction apply to federal question cases?
focus on the anchor claim (the federal question claim not the state law claim)
if both claims are out of the same common nucleus of operative fact, fed ct may exercise supp jurisdiction over state law claim
doesn’t matter whether those claims involve joinder
SMJ / Supplemental Jurisdiction in Diversity Jurisdiction
what is the basic rule for supplemental jurisdiction in diversity jurisdiction cases?
state law claims must still be part of the same case or controversy / common nucleus of operative fact
CAN’T exercise supp juris over
- claims by P against persons made a party under Rules 14, 19, 20, 24 (if only one D, then it’s okay)
- claims by parties seeking to intervene as P under Rule 24
- claims by parties proposed to be joined a P under Rule 19
these claims need to independently satisfy the div juris requirements
what are the two types of counterclaims?
- compulsory - same transaction or occurrence as the opposing party’s claim
- permissive - does NOT arise out of same transaction or occurrence
SMJ / Supplemental Jurisdiction in Diversity Jurisdiction
can supplemental jurisdiction apply to compulsory counterclaims?
if counterclaim is compulsory + brought by D, doesn’t have to meet $75k
SMJ / Supplemental Jurisdiction in Diversity Jurisdiction
can supplemental jurisdiction apply to permissive counterclaims?
can only be heard by federal div court IF it independently satisfies diversity jurisdiction
what is a cross-claim?
claim by a co-party
same side of the v.
SMJ / Supplemental Jurisdiction in Diversity Jurisdiction
what is required for a cross claim to qualify for supplemental jurisdiction?
- Relatedness Requirement - arise out of the transaction or occurrence that is subject matter of action or counterclaim
- must be related to a claim over which the court has SMJ (anchor claim)
- must NOT be asserted by P against a person made a party under Rules 14, 19, 20, 24
1. does counterclaim arise out of the same t/o as anchor claim? 2. is cross claim brought by P against person who is trying to join?
SMJ / Supplemental Jurisdiction in Diversity Jurisdiction
does supplemental jurisdiction in diversity cases allow you to join a non-diverse D or non-diverse P?
nope, never
SMJ / Supplemental Jurisdiction in Diversity Jurisdiction
if multiple P + one D, can other P with related claims bring those claims against the D?
yes even if their claims don’t satisfy the diversity jurisdiction $75k
(assumes one diverse P satisfies jurisdictional amount)
single D wasn’t made a party though Rules 14, 19, 20, 24
personal jurisdiction
when is PJ an issue (like what type of court)?
federal and state court
rules are generally the same
personal jurisdiction
what is the default federal rule for PJ?
use the long arm statue of the state in which the federal court sits
tip
how do you answer a personal jurisdiction question?
- has the basis for exercising PJ over an out of state D been authorized by statute OR by rule of court?
- is the particular basis for exercising PJ permitted by the Due Process Clause?
what type of jurisdiction (PJ or SMJ) can you waive?
PJ
personal jurisdiction
how do you waive PJ?
- General Appearance - D voluntarily litigating on the merits
- D waives by substantial participation on the merits
- Federal Rule: have to raise lack of PJ at first opportunity or it’s waived –> pre-answer MTD or answer (whichever is first)
personal jurisdiction
what are the types of personal jurisdiction?
- in personam - against the person (further divided into general or specific)
- in rem - against the thing
- quais in rem - kinda against the thing
personal jurisdiction / in personam
what are the constitutional requirements for In Personam Jurisdiction?
are there sufficient contacts b/t the D and forum state so that it would be consistent with traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice to sue the D here?
Due Process
minimum contacts –> whether there is Purposeful Availement by D
personal jurisdiction / in personam
what are the two types of In Personam Jurisdiction?
- general
- specific
personal jurisdiction / in personam / general
what is general in personam jurisdiction? basic rule
P can assert any claims against D, even if unrelated to D’s contacts with the forum state
whether a corporation’s affiliations with the forum state are so “continuous and systematic” as to render the corporation essentially “at home” in the forum state
additional from Essay 4983
personal jurisdiction / in personam
what type of in personam jurisdiction requires some connection to the forum state?
general allows any claim
specific requires a connection to forum state
personal jurisdiction / in personam / general
what are the bases for general in personam jurisdiction?
- physical presence within the state
- domicile
- consent
- corporations
personal jurisdiction / in personam / general
how do you establish general in personam jurisdiction for physical presence?
service of process on D while they are physically present in the state –> knowingly and voluntarily in the state
EXCEPTIONS
only in the state because of summons
force
fraud
personal jurisdiction / in personam / general
how do you establish general in personam jurisdiction through consent?
- expressly
- implicitly (by not raising the issue)
- appointment of an agent for receiving process
- contract
personal jurisdiction / in personam / general
how do you establish general in personam jurisdiction for corporations?
- merely doing business in a state is insufficient
- only applies to corporations that are “at home” in the forum state (where it’s incorporated + principal place of business)
personal jurisdiction / in personam / specific
what is the general rule for specific in personam jurisdiction?
P’s claim must arise out of D’s forum contacts OR be directly related to those contacts
D must have sufficient minimum contacts with forum such that exercise of juris is fair
state long arm statutes authorize specific jurisdiction based on some minor contacts
personal jurisdiction / in personam / specific
what are the bases for specific in personam jurisdiction?
state long arm statutes give courts in personam juris over out of state D ONLY for particular transactions involving that state
can be super broad - as far as Due Process Clause permits
personal jurisdiction / in personam / specific
in general, which long arm statute do federal courts follow?
long arm statute of the states in which the federal court sits
EXCEPTION: federal rules that extend in personam juris of fed cts beyond state boundaries
personal jurisdiction / in personam / specific
what are the exceptions for when a federal rule gives federal courts in personam juris beyond state boundaries?
- Federal Interpleader Act - nationwide service of process
- Bulge Provision of Federal Rules - allows service anywhere within 100 miles of federal court for (1) impleading 3p D under Rule 14 + (2) joining necessary parties under Rule 19
- Unusual Provision Rule 4k2 - if D is not subj to PJ in any state + suing under federal law –> federal ct can exercise jurisdiction as long as D has minimum contacts with US as a whole
personal jurisdiction / in rem
what is in rem jurisdiction (basic rule)?
suit can be brought against a piece of property if (1) property is in the state where you are suing and (2) suit will settle all rights and everyone’s claims to the property
any property - real or personal
form of specific jurisdiction
personal jurisdiction / quasi in rem
what is quasi in rem jurisdiction (general rule)?
suit to adjudicate the claim to property of a particular D(s)
subject matter may/may not be related to the property as long as minimum contacts exist
personal jurisdiction / quasi in rem
what is the historical rule for quasi in rem jurisdiction?
could use quasi in rem to get D’s assets even if completely unrelated
personal jurisdiction / quasi in rem
what is the current rule for quasi in rem jurisdiction?
same minimum contacts test applies as with in personam jurisdiction
if property is subject of the suit, probs enough to have min contacts b/t D and forum, so juris is likely permitted
if property is NOT subject of the suit, ownership of property in the state isn’t enough to establish general juris over D
service of process
what is generally required for service of process?
- service of a summons
- service of copy of compliant
gives ct jurisdiction
gives D notice
served to someone 18+ AND not a party (MBE Primer #2)
service of process
what is the default rule for service of process in federal courts?
okay as long as it follows the law of the state in which the federal court is based
service of process
what are the Federal Rules of service that are always allowed? regardless of state rules
- in hand personal delivery
- leaving summons at D’s house with person of suitable age and discretion
- delivery of summons to authorized agent
- by mail requiring a signed receipt (for ppl in foreign countries)
service of process
how do you serve for in rem + quasi in rem actions?
must make a diligent effort to locate all claimants and serve them personally
service of process
when is notice by publication allowed?
like posting in a newspaper
only if claimants can’t be located after diligent effort
can’t do this if you’re being lazy and you can easily find the names and addresses of the claimants
service of process
why would a D waive service of the summons?
they get longer to answer (60 days to respond vs. 21 days)
service of process
what is the normal time frame for the D to respond to service of the summons?
30 days or 60 if D is outside U.S.
P can notify D that an action has been commenced only by first class mail
what is an injunction?
form of relief that requires a D to do something (mandatory injunction)
OR prohibits a D from doing something (prohibitory injunction)
injunctions
when can a court issue a permanent injunction?
after it has fully heard a case
injunctions
when can a court issue a preliminary injunction? what is required?
prior to a full hearing on the merits
- notice to D AND
- hearing on whether the injunction should be granted
injunctions
when can a court issue a temporary restraining order? what is required? how long do they last?
preserves status quo until court can make a decision on the preliminary injunction
can’t last more than 14 days unless (1) other party agrees or (2) ct finds good cause for extension
moving party has to establish under oath
1. immediate and irreparable injury if there is a delay
2. moving party’s atty has to certify any efforts that have been made to give notice and why notice is not required
injunctions
if a temporary restraining order is issued without notice, what can the other party do?
make a motion to dissolve the TRO
injunctions
when can a temporary restraining order be appealed?
not appealable generally
UNLESS they have the effect of a preliminary injunction
preliminary injuction can be appealed immediately
venue
what is venue?
among the courts in this judicial system, which one is most appropriate to hear a case?
federal system: whether this district is a proper court to hear this action
venue
whose responsibility is it to object is venue is improper?
defendant
failure to make a timely objection results in waiver
venue
when does venue have to be raised in federal cases?
must be raised at first opportunity or it’s waived
first oppy = pre-answer MTD or D’s answer (if no pre-answer MTD)
venue / federal rule
when is federal venue proper in a district? (what is the test)
- where any D resides (as long as ALL D reside in the same state) OR
- where the claim arose (substantial part)
- if neither 1 or 2, any district where D is subject to PJ has venue
venue / federal rule
is the focus on the D or P?
D
venue / federal rule
how do you determine the residence?
- individuals: domicile
- business entities: every district in which PJ exists
venue / federal rule
if a case begins in state court and is removed to federal court, what happens with venue?
venue is automatically proper in federal district where state court sits
even if it would not have been proper originally
venue / federal rule / transfer
what is the general rule for transfer?
transfer is only allowed to a district with proper venue
UNLESS all parties agree to transfer to a district w/o proper venue
venue / federal rule / transfer
if a case is brought with proper venue, what can happen?
may be transferred with convenience to another district with proper venue
venue / federal rule / transfer
if a case is brought without proper venue, what can happen?
- dismissed OR
- transferred to district with proper venue
conflict of law (which state’s law applies)
if a suit was brought in a district w/ proper venue and it’s transferred to another district, which law applies?
law of the transferor forum controls (the original court)
take your law with you
conflict of law (which state’s law applies)
if a suit was brought in a district w/o proper venue and it’s transferred to another district, which law applies?
law of the transferee court controls (the second court)
trying to prevent an advantage to filing in the wrong court
choice of law (Erie)
in a diversity case, what law does a federal court apply?
state substantive law
BUT if it is unclear whether an issue is substantive or procedural, then must determine if federal law addresses the issue
additional info from PQs Set 3
choice of law (Erie)
what is state substantive law?
- substantive rules that govern conduct - what must be proved to win a case and what defenses may be asserted
- state states of limitations on state causes of action
- burdens of proof on state claims or defenses
choice of law (Erie)
what is federal procedural law?
anything covered by FRCP is procedural
federal law applies even if substance of claim is governed by state law
Hanna v. Plumer
choice of law (Erie)
if there is no federal statute or rule on point, how does a court determine whether to apply state law or federal law?
whether to follow state law (matter is substantive) OR follow federal law (procedural)
choice of law (Erie)
What are the twin aims of Erie?
- avoid forum shopping
- avoid inequitable administration of justice
choice of law (Erie)
what law controls the role of the jury in federal court?
federal law
choice of law (Erie)
if the choice of law of the procedure would be outcome determinative, what law should the federal court apply?
state law to prevent forum shopping
choice of law (Erie)
what is federal common law?
- judge-made federal law that overrides any inconsistent state or local law or rule
- federal courts federal common law only when they encounter important federal interests that are not covered by statute
choice of law (Erie)
how do you determine the applicable state law?
- follow precedent from highest state court
- if no precedent, predict how the highest state court would rule
- give respectful attention (not binding) to decisions of lower state courts
pleadings
what law controls when a diversity jurisdiction action begins?
state law
pleadings
what are the three types of pleadings?
- complaint
- answer
- reply
pleadings
what is the purpose of a complaint?
state a claim for relief
pleadings
what is the purpose of a reply?
P to answer a counterclaim
pleadings
what is required for a complaint (or any pleading in which a claim is made)?
- short and plain statement of court’s SMJ
- short and plain statement showing claimant is entitled to relief
- claim for relief sought by pleader (relief isn’t limited to what is listed)
pleadings
under FRCP, what is required in a Notice Pleading?
needs to give fair notice of the pleader’s claim
pleadings
what type of claims require special pleadings? what does it mean for something to be a special pleading?
must be alleged particularity, specificity, detail
- fraud or mistake
- claims for special damages
pleadings
what is the inquiry for analyzing pleadings?
- identify allegations that are “conclusory” or “mere legal conclusions”
- look at remaining factual allegations and ask whether they add up to a “plausible” case for recovery
probable > “plausible” > possible
Twombly and Iqbal
tip
what should I think of if I see unconvincing or implausible allegations with no factual support?
think of Twiqbal
if complaints are obvi unfounded, dismiss it
defense motions
Types of motion to dismiss
- lack of SMJ (can raise at any time)
- lack of PJ (waived)
- improper venue (waived)
- insufficient process (waived)
- insufficient service of process (waived)
- failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted
- failure to join a necessary party
- [forum non conveniens]
FRCP 12b6
defense motions
when do you have to raise lack of PJ or improper venue?
at the earliest oppy (pre-answer MTD or the answer)
defense motions
what type of claim can you NOT waive?
SMJ
can be raised by any party at any time