Week 9 Chapter 11 Conflict and Negotiation in the Workplace Flashcards
The process in which one party perceives that its interests are being opposed or negatively affected by another party
Is conflict defined
Some level of conflict is good because it:
-Energises debate -Re-examine assumptions -Improves responsiveness to external environment -Increases team cohesion
Is Conflict Good or Bad?:Pre 1970s View
Historically, experts viewed conflict as dysfunctional -Undermined relations -Wasted human energy -More job dissatisfaction, turnover, stress -Less productivity, information sharing 1970s to 1990s - belief in an optimal level of conflict
Is conflict good or bad? Conflicts can be either _____ or _____-focused:
task, relationship-focused:
types of conflict in which people focus on the characteristics of other individuals, rather than on the issues, as the source of conflict, this causes ………
Relationship conflict
- personality clashes
- reduces trust
- attacks credibility
Disagreements among group members about how a task should be accomplished
Task conflict
Individuals can frame conflicts in one of three ways:
- Interests-based frame
- Rights-based frame
- Power-based frame
Name that conflict approach
An approach to conflict that emphasises disputants’ underlying needs and interests. People are more likely to engage in constructive conflict resolution when adopting this frame. By focusing on the issues, discussions have a problem-solving orientation that enables people to respect other points of view.
Interests-based frame
Focuses on issue (hard on the problem, soft on the person) Resolves differences through problem solving discussion
Name that conflict approach
An approach to conflict that focuses on the contractual obligations, legal rights or precedents. Conflicts are more likely to escalate rapidly and become personal when this frame is adopted.
Rights-based frame
Focuses on personal rights or relative power Low consideration for other party Resolves differences through threats to protect rights Tends to generate relationship conflict and conflict escalation
Name that conflict approach An approach to conflict that focuses on who has more power in the dispute. Individuals invoke their status and use threats in order to intimidate others and to enforce their preferred solution, but power is subjective so conflict will escalate as individuals attempt to demonstrate their power while eroding the power of others.
Power-based frame
The conflict process model
Conflict process model 1. Sources of conflict a. Incompatible goals b. Differentiation c. Interdependence d. Scare resources e. Ambiguous rules f. Poor communication leads to 2. 2. Conflict perceptions and emotions a. conflict escalation b. conflict escalation 3. Manifest conflict a. conflict style b. decisions c. overt behaviors 4. Conflict outcomes a. positive i. better decisions ii. responsive organization iii. team cohesion b. negative i. stress/ morale ii. turnover iii. politics v. lower performance vi. distorted information
Sources of conflict in organisations
Incompatible Goals
Differentiation
Interdependence
Scarce Resources
Ambiguous Rules
Communication Problems
Name that Organisational Conflict
Occurs when the goals of one person or department seem to interfere with another person’s or department’s goals ex internecine warfare
Incompatible Goals
Name that Organisational Conflict
when there are differences among people, departments and other entities regarding their training, values, beliefs and experiences. Two people or departments may agree on a common goal but have difference in how to achieve that goal. Intergenerational conflicts are also mainly caused by differentiation.
Differentiation:
Name that Organisational Conflict
This occurs when team members must share common inputs to their individual tasks, need to interact in the process of executing their work, or receive outcomes (e.g. rewards) that are partly determined by the performance of others. Higher interdependence may lead to greater conflict because there is a greater chance that each side will disrupt or interfere with the other side’s goals. Complete independence and pooled interdependence offer the lowest risk of conflict. Pooled interdependence occurs when individuals operate independently except for reliance on a common resource or authority. Sequential interdependence work relationships (e.g. assembly line) carry a higher risk for conflict, while reciprocal interdependence (employees are highly dependent on each other) carries the greatest risk.
Interdependence:
Name that Organisational Conflict
Where each person or unit requires the same resource. This undermines others who need that resource to fulfil their goals.
Scarce resources:
Name that Organisational Conflict
Occurs when roles inter-lap, or are not clear -especially prevalent in mergers and acquisitions
Ambiguous Rules
Name that communication problems
- Parties lack the opportunity to communicate -rely on stereotypes
- Members lack the necessary skills to communicate
- Conflict is uncomfortable and people tend to avoid it
- Perception clouds meanings
Relationship conflict is less likely to occur, or escalate, when team members have high levels of emotional intelligence. Emotionally intelligent employees are better able to regulate their emotions during debate, which reduces risk of conflict escalation. Personal preferences also affect the way conflict is approached. In any conflict or negotiation, an approach to assist achieving goals must be selected.
Individual differences in conflict resolution
(Interpersonal conflict-handling styles)
Which goals are emphasised is shaped by relative importance placed on two factors:
- Maximising outcomes
- Preserving relationship with other person
(Interpersonal conflict-handling styles)
Which goals are emphasised is shaped by relative importance placed on two factors:
- Maximising outcomes
- Preserving relationship with other person
Combinations of these two factors yield five distinct conflict-handling styles:
Forcing
Problem solving
Yielding
Avoiding
Compromising
(Individual conflict resolution)
When parties try to find a solution that is beneficial for both parties. Win-win orientation; resources are expandable Information vital to this strategy
Information sharing is an important feature of this style because both parties collaborate to identify common ground and potential solutions that satisfy everyone.
Problem solving
(Individual conflict resolution)
The belief that the parties will find a mutually beneficial solution to their disagreement.
Win-win orientation
(Interpersonal conflict-handling styles)
Information sharing is an important feature of this style because both parties collaborate to identify common ground and potential solutions that satisfy everyone.
Two actions help:
a. Display of firm flexibility: remaining firm in meeting most important needs while being flexible on how this is accomplished
b. Use of trade-offs
(Interpersonal conflict-handling styles)
When a party tries to win the conflict at the other party’s expense win-lose orientation; fixed pie perspective increases conflict and damage long-term relationships Use when: Deep conviction about your position need a quick decision other party will take advantage of your company high assertiveness low cooperativeness
Forcing
This Forcing style relies on ‘hard’ influence tactics, particularly assertiveness, to get own way.
Two actions help:
a. Ensure good alternatives are developed which increase person’s power
b. Develop a small number of strong arguments and keep repeating them
– the belief that conflicting parties are drawing from a fixed pie, so the more one party receives, the less the other party will receiv
Known as the win-lose orientation
(Interpersonal conflict-handling styles)
Yielding: involves giving in completely to the other side’s wishes, or cooperating with little or no attention to own interests. This style involves making unilateral concessions and unconditional promises, as well as offering help with no expectation of reciprocal help. Other party is treated with respect, and triggering escalatory cycles of anger and retaliation is avoideds
Yielding
Use when: Other party has significantly more power Issue isn’t as important to you Value and logic of your position isn’t clear Low assertiveness high cooperativeness
(Interpersonal Conflict-handling styles)
1.involves looking for a position in which losses are offset by equally valued gains. This style involves matching other party’s concessions, making conditional promises or threats, and actively searching for a middle ground between the interests of both parties.
Compromising
When a party tries to smooth over or avoid a conflict represents low concern of both parties; increases frustration doesn’t resolve conflict Use when: conflict is emotionally charged cost of resolving outweigh the benefits low assertiveness low cooperativeness
This style represents low concern for both self and the other party.
Avoiding
Resolving conflict through _____
The process whereby two of more conflicting parties attempt to resolve their divergent goals by redefining the terms of their interdependence.
negotiation