Week 8 - Attraction & Close Relationships Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Social anxiety

A

characterized by intense feelings of discomfort in situations that invite public scrutiny

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Relationship between affiliation and stress

A

need for affiliation, defined as a desire to establish social contact with others ( McAdams, 1989)

One condition that strongly arouses our need for affiliation is stress.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

shyness

A

People who are shy find it difficult to approach strangers, make small talk, telephone someone for a date, participate in small groups, or mingle at parties.

shy people evaluate themselves negatively, expect to fail in their social encounters, and blame themselves when they do.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

loneliness

A

A feeling of deprivation about existing social relations.

loneliness is triggered by a discrepancy between the level of social contact a person has and the level he or she wants ( Peplau & Perlman, 1982)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Factors that are predictive of loneliness (4)

A
  • unpartnered
  • more predictive is widowing or divorce
  • transition/disruption
  • age - adolescents and 18 - 30 (decline with age)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

coping strategies for loneliness (2)

A
  • trying to build more social connections

- distraction via other activities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

familiarity in attraction

A

more likely to be attracted to people you are familiar with

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

objective perspective of physical attractiveness

A
Common Features
 “Average”
 Symmetrical
 Babies’ Preferences
 Unaffected by culture
 Spend more time looking at attractive faces
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

subjective perspectives of physical attractiveness

A
  • cultural impacts on beauty
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what-is-beautiful-is-good stereotype

A

Associate physical attractiveness with other

desirable qualities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

why does the what-is-beautiful-is-good stereotype endure?

A

self-fulfilling prophecy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

benefits of being perceived as beautiful

A

More popular, more sexually experienced, more socially skilled, more likely to attract a mate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

costs of being perceived as beautiful

A

– Distrust of evaluations

– Pressure to maintain appearance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

matching hypothesis

A

he proposition that people are attracted to others who are similar in physical attractiveness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

complementarity hypothesis

A

people seek others whose needs “oppose” their own—that people who need to dominate, for example, are naturally drawn to those who are submissive ( Winch et al., 1954).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

The role of reciprocity in liking

A

Mutual exchange of give & take

We tend to like people who like us

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

social exchange theory & the three components

A

Motivated to maximize profit & minimize loss in
relationships

A. Rewards & Costs
B. Comparison Levels
   1. Expectations
   2. Alternatives
C. Investments
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

comparison level (expectations and alternatives)

A

Expectations
– High CL
– Low CL
– Expectations met = Relationship rewarding

Alternatives (CLalt)
– Expectations of alternative relationships
– High CLalt
– Low CLalt
– Few alternatives = Relationship rewarding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

equity theory

A

Balance of benefits & contributions for both
partners

Inequity = Imbalance
– Overbenefited
– Underbenefited

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

attachment styles in developing intimate relationships

A
Secure
• Happy, friendly, based on mutual trust
Insecure
– Anxious
• Emotional highs & lows, obsessive preoccupation,
extreme jealousy
– Avoidant
• Fears intimacy, doesn’t believe in romantic love
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Lee’s love styles

A

eros (erotic love), ludus (game-playing, uncommitted love), and storge (friendship love).

can be combined like primary colours to create different kinds of love

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Sternberg’s triangular theory of love

A

intimacy - passion - commitment

23
Q

Hatfields passionate and companionate love

A

Passionate Love
– Emotionally intense, erotic
• Companionate Love
– Secure, trusting, stable

24
Q

self-disclosure

A

– We disclose to people we like
– We like people who disclose to us
– We like people to whom we have disclosed
Collins & Miller (1994)

25
Q

Communication patterns - conflict

A

Negative communication patterns

  1. Negative Affect Reciprocity
  2. Demand/withdraw Interaction Pattern
26
Q

attribution patterns - conflict

A

Happy couples make relationship-enhancing attributions, while unhappy couples make distress-maintaining attributions.

27
Q

Lauer & Lauer (1986) found the following characteristics to be top
scorers among people who had been married happily for 25+ years on
average: (6)

A
  • My spouse is my best friend
  • I like my spouse as a person
  • Marriage is a long-term commitment
  • Marriage is sacred
  • We agree on aims and goals
  • My spouse has grown more interesting
28
Q

Two components of familiarity

A

Proximity and Exposure

29
Q

Biggest predictor of familiarity

A

proximity

30
Q

Mere Exposure Effect (Zajonc)

A

increased exposure/contact -> leads to liking

31
Q

What predicts who you will be initially attracted to?

A
  • familiarity
  • physical attractiveness
  • first encounters
  • evolutionary drives (waist to hip ratio - healthy)
32
Q

Cultural impacts on beauty

A
 Enhance beauty in different ways
 Availability of food
• Limited: Heavier women seen as more attractive
 Time
• Playboy‐ 1953 vs. now
33
Q

What determines whether a first encounter

will develop into a relationship?

A
  1. Similarity
  2. Liking
  3. Being hard to get
34
Q

We tend to like others that are similar to us in terms of (4)

A
  1. Demographic
  2. Attitude
  3. Physical
    • “Matching hypothesis”
  4. Subjective Experience
35
Q

Evolutionary drives behind who women find attractive

A

Few children; high parental investment
– Highly selective
– Seeks successful (wealthy) men

36
Q

Evolutionary drive behind who men find attractive

A

– Many children; minimal parental investment
– Increase number of offspring
– Seek fertile women

37
Q

Three basic components of intimate relationships

A
  1. Feelings of attachment, affection, & love
  2. Fulfillment of psychological needs
  3. Interdependence between partners
38
Q

The role of rewards and costs in relationships

A

Satisfaction determined by more rewards & fewer costs

Rewards: 
 Love
– Companionship
– Emotional support
– Sexual gratification

Costs:
– Conflict
– Compromise
– Sacrifice

39
Q

The role of investment in relationships (SET)

A
Something put into the
relationship that cannot be recovered
– Time
– Other opportunities
• Investments increase commitment
40
Q

Exchange relationships

A

– Tit‐for‐tat
– Concern with zero balance
– Who?
• Strangers, casual acquaintances, business partnerships

41
Q

Communal relationships

A

– Respond to needs over time
– No concern for who last gave/received benefit
– Who?
• Close friends, romantic partners, family members

42
Q

Psychological Reactance

A

Reasserting yourself -> people want to get what they cannot get

43
Q

Excitation transfer

A

arousal caused by one stimulus is added to arousal from a second stimulus and the combined arousal is attributed to the second stimulus.

44
Q

Passionate love

A

= Prolonged & mutual eye

gazing

45
Q

Companionate love

A
  • Close friends & lovers
  • Foundation of mutual trust, caring, respect, etc
  • High levels of self‐disclosure
46
Q

Reducing conflict in marital relationships

A
  1. Increase rewarding aspects of relationship
     Ratio of positive to negative (5:1)
     Contain conflict to the issue
  2. Try to understand partner’s point of view
    Change attributions you make for partner’s
    behaviors
     Relationship‐enhancing attributions
     Distress‐maintaining attributions
47
Q

Stanley Schachter (1959) Stress and Affiliation

A

Schachter found that people who were expecting to receive painful electric shocks chose to wait with other nervous participants rather than alone

48
Q

Yacov Rofe stress and affiliation and utility (1984)

A

Rofé argued that stress sparks the desire to affiliate only when being with others is seen as useful in reducing the negative impact of the stressful situation.

49
Q

Benefit of affiliation during stressful times?

A

Research suggests that people facing an imminent threat seek each other out in order to gain cognitive clarity about the danger they are in. (Mahler & Kulik)

50
Q

Zajonc’s mere exposure effect

A

The phenomenon whereby the more often people are exposed to a stimulus, the more positively they evaluate that stimulus.

51
Q

Snyder et al (1977)

A

Men who thought they were interacting with a woman who was attractive

  • formed more positive impressions of her personality and
  • were friendlier in their conversational behavior. And now for the clincher:
  • the female students whose partners had seen the attractive picture were later rated by listeners to the conversation as warmer, more confident, and more animated.
52
Q

Negative Affect Reciprocity

A

tit-for-tat exchange of expressions of negative feelings

53
Q

Demand/withdraw interaction pattern

A

many unhappy marriages are also characterized by a demand/withdraw interaction pattern, in which the wife demands that the couple discuss the relationship problems, only to become frustrated when her husband withdraws from such discussions ( Christensen & Heavey, 1993).