Week 12 - Law Flashcards
Ground truth
the actual facts of the witnessed event
System Variables
Under the control of criminal justice system (e.g lineup)
Estimator Variables
Not under control of crim. justice system. (e.g race of perp. vs victim)
Benefits of lab studies in EW research
- control over both system and estimator variables
DVs in EW research
1) Can the witness correctly recall the event/crime 2) can the witness correctly recall the perp. 3) Can the witness recognise the perp - Administration of lineup
Two ways recall in EW
Open ended question or direct question
Biggest problem with the way police questioning (Fisher 1987)
Leading/suggestive questions
Misinformation Effect
- Witness presented with inaccurate information which is incorporated into recall of original memory
What did Loftus and Palmer (1974) find re: misinformation effect
The choice of word affected recall (i.e smash - faster, contacted or bumped - slower) - smashed = ‘broken glass’ yes - no broken glass in any condition.
Memory Impairment Hypothesis
Post-event information corrupts the original memory. - original memory lost and replaced by revision
Source misattribution hypothesis
more support for this hyp - Original memory still exists - people confused about source of post-even information
How does misinformation become incorporated
- co-witness discussion
- police officer questioning (such as incorrect assumption)
average adoption rate of false memories in Loftus’ studies
25 %
False-ID
IDing the suspect in a target-absent lineup
Why do police prefer a photo lineup? (6)
- Easier to construct
- Portable
- No suspect right to counsel
- Static (suspects behaviour can’t invalidate lineup)
- Witness less anxious
Simultaneous photo lineup
Creates a relative judgement - possible suspects are compared to each other and choose one that looks most like culprit
Sequential photo lineup
- absolute judgement
- compare photo to memory of culprit
Target absent study (Lindsay & Wells 1985) simultaneous vs sequential - which produced more correct rejections?
- Sequential (67%) vs simultaneous (42%)
Lineup bias
subtle directions to witness to choose suspect
Foil bias
- Foils do not match witness’ description of culprit - suspect does
Clothing Bias
- Foils not wearing clothing similar to witness’ description - suspect is
Instruction bias
-
Does confidence indicate accuracy?
Cutler & Penrod (1989) found a small pos. correlation. The relationship is malleable - some factors increase confidence without increasing accuracy
What is the recommendation re: confidence ratings?
To get the rating immediately after the identification decision