Week 5: Predicting People's Behaviour Flashcards
Implicit Association Test
Mahzarin Banaji and Tony Greenwald in 1995.
IAT, which displayed an image then words. Tests the time between exposed to the image and your selection.
Implicit bias and attitudes
Internalised assumptions that cause us to approach situations from a pre-established viewpoint. Usually cannot be accessed simply by asking. Often, such bias do not align with who we are, we think homeless people are lazy and we are not homeless ourselves.
Causes:
-We seek to identify patterns.
-We like to take shortcuts
-Our experience and social conditioning
Examples of Implicit bias
Girls are often internalise the perception that they are worse at math than language. Girls are much less likely to pursue a career in STEM.
Black people half as likely to be recruit despite having the same qualifications as a white person.
Doctors tend to dominant conversation with black people
Don’t even get me started on the judicial system.
Strategies against implicit biases
-Focus on seeing people as individuals
-Understand your stereotypes
-Examine reflex action
-Switch perspective
-Increase exposure
-Practice mindfulness
Factors which predict behaviour
Interpersonal Attraction
Interpersonal Attraction?
Hint: Aspects that allow us to predict behaviour.
-Proximity
-Interpersonal Reward
-Similarity
-Physical attractiveness
Proximity
-Interaction accessibility (50-50 chance of your ‘one and only’ being within walking distance) Situational influences.
-Essentially breeds familiarity.
-Genetic endowment
-Initial and final impressions (bad initial impression, and growing familiar
-Interaction accessibility rather than physical proximity.
-Environmental spoiling (spoiling one’s living space)
Lott and Lott 1974
Reward and Affiliation
Rewarding and successful experience
Unrewarding and failing experience.
Interpersonal Reward
-Behaviourist perspective (Byrne& Murren 1988)
-Reciprocal
-Investment return
-Resources, material or otherwise
-Romantic partner (similar values)
Similarity
…is perceived as attractive. Subsets of this are homophily. (Steinburg and Monahan 2007). Exceptions of this are dominant preferring submissives.
Homophily
Friends are selected by similarity.
Physical attractiveness
Reis et al 1980 Physically attractive individuals reported interactions as much more pleasant, than those who weren’t.
Is it confused with the effect physical attractiveness bestows, general confidence in one’s impressions and interactions?
More relevance in romantic relationships, as opposed to non-romantic relationships.
Matching hypothesis
People choose those which consider themselves on a similar ‘par’ of attractiveness. Than those who were not. (Yela & Sangrador 2001)
Ventral Staritam Arousal
Is the physiological reward gained when eye contact is maintained with an attractive person, and lost when eye contact is broken.
Love types
Hatfield 1988- Two types
Passionate Love: Wild physical attraction and ‘absorption?’
Often has a ‘used by date’ that leads to…
Companionate Love: Deep affection, emotional intimacy and friendship. -Burton et al. 2001
Resurgences of passionate love throughout companionate love.
-Sternburg 1998- Triangular love theory (three types)
Intimacy-
Passion-
Commitment-
Love through the evolutionary perspective.
A means to procreate
-Birnbaum and Reis marked three contributions to love. Caring for offspring (parental love), courtship, sexual intimacy and concern for family are aspects considered for reproduction.
Fletcher et al. 2004 found both men and women valued warmth and trustworthiness. However, women emphasised status and resources. While men emphasized attractiveness, energy, wellbeing and vitality. Which aligns with the theory ‘to procreate’.
-sexual strategies.
Ethical Hedonism
Evolutionary Psychologists propose…
People act in a way that maximises their inclusive fitness and more likely to behave altruistically to relatives.
Bystander Intervention
It is found people are unlikely to help if in the presence of strangers. Individuals will constantly look for reassurances not to get involved, and will lend into the false sense of security of diffusing responsibility between others.
Although, if surrounded by compatriots 20% more likely to help.
Aggression
Behaviour aimed to harm.
-Culture variances
-Gender variances (consistent across cultures, males are more likely to perform acts of violence)
Social Influence (other’s presence)
Obedience: Compliance with authority. Milgram Experiment.
Conformity: Changing oneself to accommodate other’s standards. Asch Experiment
Social Influence Principles
- Principle of Reciprocity (compelled to reciprocate)
- Principle of Commitment (compelled to act as expected, prior impressions, etc)
- Principle of Liking (we do things for the people we like, in hopes they’ll stick around)
Bystander Help depends on…
Situational Variables- personality, self-efficacy, and ‘high self-monitors’
Dispositional Variables
Social Interaction…
-Altruism
-Aggression
Reasons to form relationships
-Instrumental goals
-Companionship
-Shared Interests
-Relative obligations
Sexual Interests
Social exchange theories
Behaviourist principles that reciprocal reward is the centre of relationships. -Homans 1961
-Examples of markets, investment (even in personal relationships)